Skip to content
Mary Reynolds Babcock Foundation Incorporated at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Mary Reynolds Babcock Foundation Incorporated

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$18M
Granted FY2024still arriving
76
Grants FY2024still arriving
16
States reached
$1.3M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Public Benefit$27MCivil Rights$21MCommunity Improvement$13MPhilanthropy$5.5MHuman Services$4.3MEducation$2.8MCrime & Legal$2.5MHousing & Shelter$2.4MOther$0
02FY2024 · 76 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k25 grants · $585k
  • $50k–250k20 grants · $3.2M
  • $250k+31 grants · $14M
$205,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$182M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROGEORGIA STATE TABLE INC$1,250,000
POWER COALITION FOR EQUITY AND JUSTICE$1,080,000
ALABAMA FORWARD$850,000
MISSISSIPPI ENGAGED$805,000
ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE$700,000
STATE VOICES$675,000
CENTER ON BUDGET AND POLICY PRIORTITIES$637,500
STATE LEADERSHIP PROJECT$575,000
NORTH CAROLINA ASIAN AMERICANS TOGETHER$405,000
MISSISSIPPI VOTES$400,000
GEORGIA BUDGET AND POLICY INSTITUTE INC$400,000
ALABAMA ARISE$350,000
WEST VIRGINIA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT HUB INC$350,000
STEP UP LOUISIANA$330,000
SOUTHERN VISION ALLIANCE$325,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $7.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 49% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%ANDERSON INTERFAITH MINISTRIES INC: $125k → 15%THE ORDINARY PEOPLE SOCIETY: $220k → 17%COLABORATIVA LA MILPA: $30k → 12%ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE ATLANTA: $700k → 9%GEORGIA LATINO ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS: $235k → 14%NATURAL CAPITAL INVESTMENT FUND: $40k → 9%CENTER FOR RURAL STRATEGIES INC: $160k → 29%ARKANSAS UNITED: $20k → 14%THE ORDINARY PEOPLE SOCIETY: $100k → 17%ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE: $700k → 9%NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS: $70k → 14%PARTNER COMMUNITY CAPITAL: $20k → 9%THE ORDINARY PEOPLE SOCIETY: $20k → 17%ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE ATLANTA: $425k → 9%NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS: $70k → 14%ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE ATLANTA: $275k → 9%LATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $250k → 11%ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE ATLANTA: $200k → 9%NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS: $50k → 14%ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE ATLANTA: $100k → 9%CENTER FOR RURAL STRATEGIES INC: $100k → 29%ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE ATLANTA: $100k → 9%NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS: $40k → 14%NORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE CENTER: $100k → 8%ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE ATLANTA: $50k → 9%SOUTHEAST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS NETWORK: $275k → 13%ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE ATLANTA: $20k → 9%SOUTHEAST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS NETWORK: $225k → 13%NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS: $40k → 14%CENTER FOR RURAL STRATEGIES INC: $50k → 29%ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE ATLANTA: $20k → 9%SOUTHEAST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS NETWORK: $88k → 13%SOUTHEAST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS NETWORK: $25k → 13%SOUTHERN PARTNERS FUND INC: $450k → 13%SOUTHERN PARTNERS FUND INC: $350k → 13%SOUTHERN PARTNERS FUND INC: $225k → 13%GEORGIA LATINO ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS: $290k → 14%GEORGIA LATINO ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS: $75k → 14%GEORGIA LATINO ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS: $75k → 14%GEORGIA COALITION FOR THE PEOPLE'S AGENDA: $50k → 13%GEORGIA LATINO ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS: $62k → 14%GEORGIA LATINO ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS: $50k → 14%WOMEN WATCH AFRIKA: $20k → 14%WOMEN WATCH AFRIKA: $20k → 14%WOMEN WATCH AFRIKA: $20k → 14%EL PUEBLO INC: $300k → 8%EL PUEBLO INC: $275k → 8%EL PUEBLO INC: $200k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WI
NY
CA
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$66M · 82 repeat orgs$21M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

82 repeat relationships: 46 still active in FY2024, 36 since wound down; 30 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

82
100

Total granted

$66M
$18M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+31%

Still filing today

88%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsPublic BenefitEducationCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE ATLANTA INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $2.6M · revenue +30%
  • SL
    STATE LEADERSHIP PROJECT
    3× · 2020–2024 · $2.4M · revenue +86%
  • PC
    POWER COALITION FOR EQUITY AND JUSTICE
    3× · 2021–2024 · $2.2M · revenue +760% · 41% of their budget

Funded once

  • BLUEPRINT NORTH CAROLINA
    one grant, 2020 · $1.9M · revenue -69%
  • NF
    NEIGHBORHOOD FUNDERS GROUP ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN WORKERS OPPORTUNITY FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $1.0M
  • SL
    STATE LEADERSHIP PROJECT ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN WORKING GROUP
    one grant, 2022 · $1.0M
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Forward Justice Action Network

Forward Justice Action Network is a nonprofit with the purpose to engage in educational and advocacy activities to promote political and grassroots support for public policies that advance racial social and economic justice in North…

Human Services
2
Carolina Common Enterprise

The specific objectives and purposes of this corporation shall be to assist individuals and communities, particularly those in low-income and socially disadvantaged areas, in the creation, expansion, and improvement of rural and…

Community Improvement
3
Action Institute Nc

Action institute nc is a community organization and citizens action group that organizes residents of low-wealth communities and constituencies most of whom are people of color- to represent their own interests on issues of social and…

—
4
Community Action Coalition for South Central Wisconsin Inc

At community action coalition for south central wisconsin, inc. (cac) our mission is to transform our communities by fostering conditions where everyone can achieve social and economic security. cac exists to push back on poverty. our…

—
5
New Georgia Project Action Fund

New georgia project action find is on a mission to increase the civic participation of the new georgia majority and other historically marginalized communities by building grassroots political power in support of progressive leaders,…

—
6
New Disabled South Inc

To improve the lives of disabled people and build strong disability justice and rights movements in the South through research & knowledge building, advocacy & policy change, non-partisan voter engagement, and coalition building.

Health
7
Louisiana Alliance for Nonprofits

To strengthen, promote, and build the capacity of louisiana's nonprofit sector through education, advocacy, and member services.

Philanthropy
8
Central Carolina Economic Development Alliance

The alliance stimulates economic expansion and facilitates job creation by promoting central south carolina as a valuable location for businesses.

Community Improvement
9
Southern Center for Human Rights

The Southern Center for Human Rights is working for equality, dignity, and justice for people impacted by the criminal legal system in the Deep South. SCHR fights for a world free from mass incarceration, the death penalty, the…

Civil Rights
10
New Disabled South Rising Inc

New Disabled South Rising is the advocacy arm of New Disabled South focusing on poverty and care, criminalization and democracy.

Civil Rights
11
Alliance for a Healthier South Carolina

Convene and connect diverse stakeholders to align and catalyze efforts to improve health and well-being for communities across South Carolina.

—
12
Appalachian Community Capital Development Foundation

To increase small business lending by providing appalachian member institutions that serve underserved people and communities with new sources of capital.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southern Vision Alliance; the most unlike its peers is Women Watch Afrika. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

156 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 156 of the 224 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

19
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
39
Early backer (in before they grew)
155/156
Grantees still filing
91/156
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PROGEORGIA STATE TABLE INC: $3,680,000 · Civil RightsPROGEORGIA STATE TABLE …STATE VOICES: $3,675,000 · Civil RightsSTATE VOICESPOWER COALITION FOR EQUITY AND JUSTICE: $2,180,000 · Civil RightsPOWER COALITION FOR EQU…Democracy North Carolina: $1,735,000 · Civil RightsDemocracy North Carolin…ALABAMA FORWARD: $1,225,000 · Civil RightsALABAMA FORWARDCIVIC TN: $1,075,000 · Civil RightsCIVIC TNNORTH CAROLINA ASIAN AMERICANS TOGETHER: $993,500 · Civil RightsMISSISSIPPI ENGAGED: $805,000 · Civil Rights+11 more: $3,290,000 · Civil Rights+11 moreNEIGHBORHOOD FUNDERS GROUP ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN WORKERS OPPORTUNITY FUND: $1,000,000 · OtherSTATE LEADERSHIP PROJECT ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN WORKING GROUP: $1,000,000 · OtherSouth Carolina Community Loan Fund: $1,465,744 · OtherLatino Community Fund Inc: $1,390,000 · OtherARKANSAS PUBLIC POLICY PANEL INC: $1,210,000 · Other+101 more: $23,841,849 · Other+101 moreSTATE LEADERSHIP PROJECT: $2,445,000 · Public BenefitSTATE LEADERSHIP P…Center on Budget and Policy Priorities: $1,672,500 · Public BenefitCenter on Budget a…OPPORTUNITY FINANCE NETWORK: $1,400,000 · Public BenefitOPPORTUNITY FINANC…KENTUCKY COALITION INC: $1,110,000 · Public BenefitKENTUCKY COALITION…GEORGIA BUDGET AND POLICY INSTITUTE INC: $1,055,000 · Public BenefitGEORGIA BUDGET AND…SOUTHERN VISION ALLIANCE: $845,000 · Public BenefitSOUTHERN VISION AL…INVEST IN LOUISIANA: $810,000 · Public BenefitINVEST IN LOUISIAN…One Voice: $810,000 · Public BenefitOne VoiceThe Commonwealth Institute for: $810,000 · Public BenefitThe Commonwealth I…INSTITUTE ON TAXATION AND ECONOMIC POLICY: $810,000 · Public BenefitINSTITUTE ON TAXAT…KENTUCKY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC POLICY INC: $725,000 · Public BenefitWEST VIRGINIA CENTER ON BUDGET AND POLICY INC: $610,000 · Public BenefitTogether Louisiana: $600,000 · Public Benefit+3 more: $621,000 · Public BenefitASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE ATLANTA INC: $2,615,000 · Human ServicesASIAN AME…SOUTHERN PARTNERS FUND INC: $1,035,000 · Human ServicesSOUTHERN …EL PUEBLO INC: $820,000 · Human ServicesEL PUEBLO…GEORGIA LATINO ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC: $797,000 · Human ServicesGEORGIA L…SOUTHEAST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS NETWORK INC: $622,500 · Human ServicesSOUTHEAST…THE ORDINARY PEOPLE SOCIETY TOPS: $340,000 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER FOR RURAL STRATEGIES INC: $320,000 · Human ServicesNEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS INC: $280,000 · Human ServicesLATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $265,000 · Human Services+9 more: $595,050 · Human Services+9 moreGALEO LATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOP FUND INC: $1,289,500 · Community ImprovementSouth Carolina Association for Community Economic Development: $1,185,000 · Community ImprovementWEST VIRGINIA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT HUB INC: $960,000 · Community ImprovementHOPE ENTERPRISE CORPORATION: $691,698 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY VENTURES CORPORATION: $452,500 · Community ImprovementFOUNDATION FOR THE MID SOUTH INC: $350,000 · Community ImprovementMOUNTAIN ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INC: $300,000 · Community ImprovementFAIR COUNT INC: $300,000 · Community ImprovementMETANOIA: $272,500 · Community ImprovementKENTUCKY CIVIC ENGAGEMENT TABLE INC: $270,000 · Community Improvement+8 more: $798,806 · Community ImprovementBLUEPRINT NORTH CAROLINA: $1,940,000 · EducationVIRGINIA NEW MAJORITY EDUCATION FUND: $965,000 · EducationNORTH CAROLINA BLACK ALLIANCE INC: $950,000 · EducationIMPRINTS CARES: $670,000 · EducationGEORGIA ALLIANCE EDUCATION FUND INC: $500,000 · EducationWE ARE DOWN HOME: $490,000 · EducationNC COUNTS COALITION: $410,000 · EducationCODE THE DREAM INC: $270,000 · Education+7 more: $230,000 · EducationSOUTHERN COALITION FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE: $2,060,000 · Crime & LegalVOICE OF THE EXPERIENCED VOTE: $900,000 · Crime & LegalCenter for Heirs' Property Preservation: $885,000 · Crime & LegalAPPALACHIAN CITIZENS LAW CENTER INC: $405,000 · Crime & LegalFORWARD JUSTICE: $320,000 · Crime & Legal+3 more: $85,000 · Crime & Legal
Civil Rights$18,658,500Other$29,907,593Public Benefit$14,323,500Human Services$7,689,550Community Improvement$6,870,004Education$6,425,000Crime & Legal$4,655,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPROGEORGIA STATE TABLE INC: $3,680,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetSTATE VOICES: $3,675,000 over 3y, 9.3% of budgetASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE ATLANTA INC: $2,615,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetSTATE LEADERSHIP PROJECT: $2,445,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetPOWER COALITION FOR EQUITY AND JUSTICE: $2,180,000 over 3y, 41% of budgetSOUTHERN COALITION FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE: $2,060,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetBLUEPRINT NORTH CAROLINA: $1,940,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetDemocracy North Carolina: $1,735,000 over 4y, 15% of budgetCenter on Budget and Policy Priorities: $1,672,500 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetSouth Carolina Community Loan Fund: $1,465,744 over 3y, 19% of budgetOPPORTUNITY FINANCE NETWORK: $1,400,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetLatino Community Fund Inc: $1,390,000 over 4y, 18% of budgetGALEO LATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOP FUND INC: $1,289,500 over 4y, 27% of budgetALABAMA FORWARD: $1,225,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetARKANSAS PUBLIC POLICY PANEL INC: $1,210,000 over 3y, 75% of budgetSouth Carolina Association for Community Economic Development: $1,185,000 over 3y, 31% of budgetKENTUCKY COALITION INC: $1,110,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetCIVIC TN: $1,075,000 over 2y, 33% of budgetGEORGIA BUDGET AND POLICY INSTITUTE INC: $1,055,000 over 3y, 20% of budgetSOUTHERN PARTNERS FUND INC: $1,035,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA ASIAN AMERICANS TOGETHER: $993,500 over 4y, 14% of budgetVIRGINIA NEW MAJORITY EDUCATION FUND: $965,000 over 4y, 6.3% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT HUB INC: $960,000 over 3y, 28% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA BLACK ALLIANCE INC: $950,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR SOUTHERN EQUITY: $930,000 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetVOICE OF THE EXPERIENCED VOTE: $900,000 over 4y, 8.0% of budgetCOMMUNITYWORKS INC: $898,245 over 3y, 7.3% of budgetCenter for Heirs' Property Preservation: $885,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetNC CHILD: $866,250 over 3y, 14% of budgetSOUTHERN VISION ALLIANCE: $845,000 over 4y, 7.7% of budgetEL PUEBLO INC: $820,000 over 4y, 18% of budgetINVEST IN LOUISIANA: $810,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetOne Voice: $810,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetThe Commonwealth Institute for: $810,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetINSTITUTE ON TAXATION AND ECONOMIC POLICY: $810,000 over 3y, 8.0% of budgetMISSISSIPPI ENGAGED: $805,000 over 1y, 59% of budgetGEORGIA LATINO ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC: $797,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetDEEP CENTER INCORPORATED: $772,500 over 3y, 20% of budgetREYNOLDA HOUSE INC: $729,603 over 2y, 9.1% of budgetKENTUCKY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC POLICY INC: $725,000 over 3y, 25% of budgetHOPE ENTERPRISE CORPORATION: $691,698 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetIMPRINTS CARES: $670,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetSOUTHEAST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS NETWORK INC: $622,500 over 4y, 52% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA CENTER ON BUDGET AND POLICY INC: $610,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetTogether Louisiana: $600,000 over 3y, 74% of budgetTENNESSEE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS COALITION: $565,000 over 4y, 9.0% of budgetInstitute for Southern Studies Inc: $555,000 over 3y, 71% of budgetCOALFIELD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $545,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

NEO Philanthropy IncAmalgamated Charitabl…New Venture FundMarguerite Casey Foun…Z Smith Reynolds Foun…Windward FundWK Kellogg FoundationWay to RiseTides FoundationAnnie E Casey Foundat…The Ford FoundationRockefeller Family Fu…
NEO Philanthropy IncNY87.4× affinity52 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: NEO Philanthropy Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · New Venture Fund · Marguerite Casey Foundation · Z Smith Reynolds Foundation Inc · Windward Fund · WK Kellogg Foundation · Way to Rise · Tides Foundation · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation · Rockefeller Family Fund Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mary Reynolds Babcock Foundation Incorporated funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mary Reynolds Babcock Foundation Incorporated. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Neighborgood Partners Inc: 35% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
35report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 224 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mary Reynolds Babcock’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home