Skip to content
M Piuze Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

M Piuze Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.8M
Granted FY2023
77
Grants FY2023
21
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

51% of M Piuze Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 58 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year M Piuze Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 58 organizations, $3M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

18
’17
19
’18
17
’19
29
’20
29
’21
46
’22
58
’23
58
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$7.5MPhilanthropy$2.6MEnvironment$1.3MInternational$1.1MCivil Rights$475kHuman Services$304kHealth$278kEducation$167kOther$0
02FY2023 · 77 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k15 grants · $75k
  • $10k–50k47 grants · $735k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $843k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.2M
$12,500
Median grant
21
States reached
$86M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION$500,000
WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK$370,000
AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION$300,000
CHIMPANZEE SANCTUARY NORTHWEST$125,847
CENTER FOR GREAT APES$111,864
SAVE THE CHIMPS INC$97,881
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$72,500
YELLOWSTONE TO YUKON$62,500
NATURE CONSERVANCY$62,500
INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION$60,000
ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY$50,000
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE$50,000
PUBLIC HEALTH ADVOCACY INSTITUTE$50,000
WILD AFRICA FUND$50,000
WILD AID$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $390k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $16k → 14%MISSION PREBORN INC: $30k → 16%CHARITY WATER: $10k → 17%MISSION PREBORN INC: $30k → 16%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $10k → 14%CHARITY WATER: $10k → 17%PREBORN: $25k → 16%HOPE FOR JUSTICE: $13k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $10k → 14%HOPE FOR JUSTICE: $8k → 14%HARVEST HOME: $13k → 14%HOPE FOR JUSTICE: $7k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $10k → 14%HOPE FOR JUSTICE: $5k → 14%HARVEST HOME: $13k → 14%CHARITY WATER: $7k → 17%HARVEST HOME: $10k → 14%CHARITY WATER: $5k → 17%HARVEST HOME: $5k → 14%CHARITY WATER: $5k → 17%CLARIS HEALTH: $15k → 14%CLARIS HEALTH: $13k → 14%CHARITY WATER: $5k → 17%CLARIS HEALTH: $13k → 14%CHARITY WATER: $5k → 17%CHARITY WATER: $5k → 17%HOPE THE MISSION: $10k → 14%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $10k → 14%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $15k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $13k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $13k → 17%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $20k → 14%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $15k → 14%LANGE FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MT
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
SD
IA
IN
CT
CA
VA
MD
AZ
AR
TN
NC
DC
HI
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 25% of M Piuze Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

M Piuze Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.4% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$11M · 81 repeat orgs$776k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

81 repeat relationships: 67 still active in FY2023, 14 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

81
16

Total granted

$11M
$260k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+8%

Still filing today

65%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $193k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHuman ServicesEnvironmentInternationalHealthReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AW
    AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +54%
  • NW
    NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION
    6× · 2018–2023 · $1.4M · revenue +87%
  • WC
    WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +302%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $80k
  • TP
    THE PREEMPTIVE LOVE COALITION
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue -71%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
3
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
4
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
5
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
6
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
7
International Fund for Animal Welfare Inc

IFAWs strategy focuses on improving the welfare of individual animals and the conservation status of wildlife populations in priority habitats through on-the-ground efforts community engagement and global advocacy. Our dual emphasis on…

Animals
8
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
9
Wildlife Alliance Inc

Wildlife alliance is the leader in direct protection of forests and wildlife in tropical asia. our mission is to combat deforestation, biodiversity loss, climate change, and poverty by partnering with local communities and governments.…

Animals
10
Fauna & Flora International Usa Inc

Our mission is to act to conserve threatened species and ecosystems worldwide, choosing solutions that are sustainable, based on sound science and take into account human needs.

Philanthropy
11
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
12
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

77 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 77 of the 119 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
74/77
Grantees still filing
57/77
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $1,975,000 · AnimalsAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INCNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $1,360,000 · AnimalsNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATIONWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $1,240,000 · AnimalsWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INCDefenders of Wildlife: $400,000 · AnimalsDefenders of WildlifeWildlife Conservation Society: $350,000 · AnimalsWildlife Conservation SocietyWILDAID INC: $325,000 · Animals+12 more: $491,592 · Animals+12 moreACLU: $435,000 · OtherACLUELEPHANT CRISIS FUND: $400,000 · OtherELEPHANT CRISIS FUND7TH GENERATION ADVISORS: $335,000 · Other7TH GENERATION ADVISORSTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $248,750 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY: $225,000 · OtherENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION AG…YELLOWSTONE TO YUKON: $223,750 · OtherYELLOWSTONE TO YUKONWORKING DOGS FOR CONSERVATION: $137,500 · Other+56 more: $1,769,500 · Other+56 moreMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC: $1,300,000 · PhilanthropyMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL…Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc: $1,300,000 · PhilanthropyRenaissance Charitabl…+1 more: $77,500 · PhilanthropyWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $202,500 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $75,000 · EnvironmentGLOBAL CONSERVATION: $55,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $55,000 · EnvironmentHAWAII WILDLIFE FUND: $39,000 · EnvironmentTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $28,500 · EnvironmentAmerican Forests: $28,500 · EnvironmentWATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC: $20,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL MARINE SANCTUARY FOUNDATION: $19,500 · Environment+2 more: $25,000 · EnvironmentINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $225,000 · InternationalWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS: $77,500 · InternationalHEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $54,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $40,000 · InternationalNOVA UKRAINE: $15,000 · International+1 more: $10,000 · InternationalMission Pre-Born Inc: $85,000 · Human ServicesCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $51,500 · Human ServicesUNION RESCUE MISSION: $46,000 · Human ServicesHarvest Home Inc: $40,000 · Human ServicesCLARIS HEALTH: $40,000 · Human ServicesTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesHope for Justice Inc: $32,000 · Human Services+5 more: $35,500 · Human ServicesPUBLIC HEALTH ADVOCACY INSTITUTE INC: $200,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $56,000 · HealthTHE PREEMPTIVE LOVE COALITION: $20,000 · Health+2 more: $12,500 · Health
Animals$6,141,592Other$3,774,500Philanthropy$2,677,500Environment$548,000International$422,000Human Services$405,000Health$288,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $1,975,000 over 8y, 2.6% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $1,360,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC: $1,300,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRenaissance Charitable Foundation Inc: $1,300,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $1,240,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetDefenders of Wildlife: $400,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society: $350,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWILDAID INC: $325,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $248,750 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $225,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $202,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC HEALTH ADVOCACY INSTITUTE INC: $200,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetSAVE THE CHIMPS INC: $127,881 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCHIMPANZEE SANCTUARY NORTHWEST: $125,847 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetCenter for Orangutan & Chimpanzee Conservation Inc: $111,864 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $97,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCrystal Peaks Youth Ranch Co: $92,500 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetMission Pre-Born Inc: $85,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CLEAR FUND: $77,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS: $77,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $75,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC: $70,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JAMES STOREHOUSE INCORPORATED: $65,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetJUSTICE RISING INTERNATIONAL: $61,500 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $56,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL CONSERVATION: $55,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $55,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $54,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $51,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNION RESCUE MISSION: $46,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE A21 CAMPAIGN INC: $45,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHarvest Home Inc: $40,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCLARIS HEALTH: $40,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $40,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII WILDLIFE FUND: $39,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CHILDREN'S FUND INC: $36,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INTERNATIONAL RHINO FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetHope for Justice Inc: $32,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $28,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Forests: $28,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAB FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBreaking Chains Academy of Development Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds Defenders of Wildlife ↗
  • Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society ↗
  • Who funds WILDAID INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC HEALTH ADVOCACY INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds SAVE THE CHIMPS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHIMPANZEE SANCTUARY NORTHWEST ↗
  • Who funds Center for Orangutan & Chimpanzee Conservation Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds Crystal Peaks Youth Ranch Co ↗
  • Who funds Mission Pre-Born Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE CLEAR FUND ↗
  • Who funds WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds AMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JAMES STOREHOUSE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds JUSTICE RISING INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds EXOTIC FELINE BREEDING COMPOUNDINC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL CONSERVATION ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds CHARITY GLOBAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Thornton S Jr and Kat…California Community …Servant FoundationThe Annenberg Foundat…Sempra FoundationT Rowe Price Program …Shell USA Company Fou…Arthur J Gallagher Fo…National Philanthropi…The US Charitable Gif…The Blackbaud Giving …American Endowment Fo…
Thornton S Jr and Katrina D Glide FoundationCA15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Thornton S Jr and Katrina D Glide Foundation · California Community Foundation · Servant Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Sempra Foundation · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The US Charitable Gift Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization M Piuze Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from M Piuze Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 67%
  • National Marine Sanctuary Foundation: 88% of income from government
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals: 67% of income from government
  • Impact Melanoma Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 119 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on M Piuze’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home