· Private foundation
Longview Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k151 grants · $428k
- $10k–50k37 grants · $689k
- $50k–250k11 grants · $1.1M
- $250k+2 grants · $697k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH | $407,000 |
| MINNESOTA LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM | $290,000 |
| DUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY | $177,000 |
| THE FRANKLIN CENTER | $160,500 |
| FRIENDS OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER | $122,000 |
| SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND | $111,500 |
| GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY | $110,000 |
| MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION | $90,000 |
| MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ART | $65,500 |
| ORONO FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION | $63,000 |
| BLAKE SCHOOL | $55,000 |
| NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION | $54,500 |
| MAYO CLINIC | $53,000 |
| MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $46,500 |
| FAMILY PARTNERSHIP | $34,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $168k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
214 repeat relationships — 170 still active in FY2023, 44 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $113k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FCFRANKLIN CENTER4× · 2020–2023 · $4.6M · revenue +165% · 57% of their budget
- SHSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND3× · 2020–2023 · $717k · revenue +31%
- DCDUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY4× · 2020–2023 · $405k · revenue +42%
Funded once
- MCMINNESOTA CENTRAL KITCHEN, 2ND HARVEST HEARTLANDone grant, 2021 · $60k
- LHLAKEWOOD HERITAGE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -92%
- VSV3 SPORTS INCone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -51%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…
To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.
MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.
The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…
Mitchell hamline school of law is an independent law school that advances its mission through a combination of legal education, public service, and community engagement. it is dedicated to preparing students to practice law, while also…
Mn community measurement empowers stakeholders with meaningful information to drive improvement.
Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.
To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…
Led by minnesota state university students, we are the inclusive voice for all future, current, and former students. we actively work to represent and support minnesota state university students and advocate at a campus, state, and federal…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Minneapolis Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Northside Boxing Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
212 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 212 of the 331 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FRANKLIN CENTER ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
- Who funds THE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
- Who funds GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA ZOO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ORONO FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds MINNEAPOLIS SOCIETY OF FINE ARTS DBA MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ARTS ↗
- Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER ↗
- Who funds The Family Partnership ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds TWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC ↗
- Who funds HENNEPIN HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE BLAKE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds WALKER ART CENTER ↗
- Who funds The Minnesota Opera ↗
- Who funds NORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE ↗
- Who funds PILLSBURY UNITED COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Washburn Center for Children ↗
- Who funds ST DAVID'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA VIKINGS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JUNEAU COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD MINNESOTA NORTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOTA ↗
- Who funds MILKWEED EDITIONS INC ↗
- Who funds LAKEWOOD HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Missoula Catholic Schools Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds MACPHAIL CENTER FOR MUSIC ↗
- Who funds GUTHRIE THEATER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ABBOTT NORTHWESTERN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The McKnight Foundation · Pohlad Family Foundation · Mortenson Family Foundation · The Crosswols Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Margaret a Cargill Foundation · The K Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Minnesota Community Foundation · Marbrook Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Longview Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wild Salmon Center — 49% of income from government
- The Oregon Community Foundation — 2% of income from government
- The Trustees of the Smith College — 1% of income from government
- Wellesley College — 1% of income from government
- Amherst College Trustees — 0% of income from government
- Williams College — 0% of income from government
- Catlin Gabel School — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Longview Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Longview Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.