Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lisa Stone Pritzker Family Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
92
Grants FY2024still arriving
16
States reached
$420k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Health$4.3MArts & Culture$1.9MInternational$1.4MCivil Rights$1.3MEducation$1.0MReligion$866kHuman Services$669kPublic Safety & Disaster$410kOther$0
02FY2024 · 92 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k25 grants · $106k
  • $10k–50k46 grants · $932k
  • $50k–250k19 grants · $1.4M
  • $250k+2 grants · $680k
$17,500
Median grant
16
States reached
$45M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UCSF FOUNDATION$420,000
SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL$260,000
CONGREGATION EMANU-EL$115,000
THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE$105,000
LUMINARY IMPACT FUND$100,000
ISRAAID (US) GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC$100,000
BLACK BABY EQUITY PROJECT$100,000
SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART$100,000
PROJECT HEALTHY MINDS$85,000
CALIFORNIA PARTNERS PROJECT$83,334
JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL$75,000
THE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION$75,000
ROADTRIP NATION$75,000
FUTURES WITHOUT VIOLENCE$55,000
PEER HEALTH EXCHANGE$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $697k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 47% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%SGA YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 14%SGA YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 14%SGA YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 14%CALIFORNIA PARTNERS PROJECT: $100k → 9%SGA YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 14%CALIFORNIA PARTNERS PROJECT: $100k → 9%CALIFORNIA PARTNERS PROJECT: $83k → 9%CALIFORNIA PARTNERS PROJECT: $83k → 9%CHILDREN NOW: $15k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $50k → 10%REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL: $5k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $20k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $10k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $10k → 10%REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL: $5k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $2k → 10%FUTURES IGNITE INC: $250 → 17%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 10%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 10%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 10%CHILDREN'S COUNCIL OF SAN FRANCISCO: $3k → 10%CHILDREN'S COUNCIL OF SAN FRANCISCO: $3k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $65k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $58k → 10%CALIFORNIA PARTNERS PROJECT: $50k → 10%YMCA OF SAN FRANCISCO: $3k → 10%REIMAGINE: $15k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
IA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
AZ
AR
NC
DC
HI
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$11M · 96 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +17% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.

96 repeat relationships — 67 still active in FY2024, 29 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

96
58

Total granted

$11M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+9%

Still filing today

76%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $519k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthEducationHuman ServicesInternationalPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART
    5× · 2020–2024 · $618k · revenue +68%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & RESEARCH CNTR FNDN
    5× · 2020–2024 · $484k · revenue +21%
  • TC
    THE CALIFORNIA PARTNERS PROJECT
    5× · 2020–2024 · $417k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • UC
    UCSF CENTER FOR COMMUNITY AND HEALTH
    one grant, 2021 · $350k
  • ZS
    ZUCKERBERG SF GENERAL HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -8%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
2
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
3
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
4
San Francisco Friends School

At san francisco friends school, students learn in a community grounded in the quaker values of reflection, integrity, peaceful problem-solving and stewardship. our teachers challenge students with a dynamic curriculum that inspires…

Education
5
Sf Partnership

SF Partnership is an organization comprised of SF's leading employers dedicated to supporting an equitable, resilient, and vibrant economy shared by all people working and living in San Francisco. Through education, advocacy, and research,…

—
6
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
7
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
8
Sandler Foundation

The foundation operates exclusively for charitable, educational or religious purposes by conducting or supporting activities for the benefit of, or to carry out the purposes of the jewish community federation of san francisco, the…

Philanthropy
9
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
10
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
11
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
12
Jews of Color Initiative

The Jews of Color Initiatives mission is to advance racial equity in the U.S. Jewish community by centering the leadership of Jews of Color and ensuring that our communities and institutions reflect the multiracial reality of the Jewish…

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma and the most unlike its peers is Aim High. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%2%<5yr15%2%5–10yr20%23%10–20yr17%27%20–35yr11%21%35–55yr13%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%6%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%19%10–20yr17%24%20–35yr11%19%35–55yr13%31%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.7%1/138
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,840

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

135 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 135 of the 184 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
131/135
Grantees still filing
71/135
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CONGREGATION EMANU-EL — $427,000 · OtherCONGREGATION EMANU-ELJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF SAN FRANCISCO MARIN & PENINSULA — $352,000 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF SAN FRANCIS…UCSF CENTER FOR COMMUNITY AND HEALTH — $350,000 · OtherUCSF CENTER FOR COMMUNITY AND HEALTHFUTURES WITHOUT VIOLENCE — $260,000 · OtherSAFE & SOUND — $250,000 · OtherCENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS — $250,000 · OtherISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC — $300,000 · OtherALL CHICAGO MAKING HOMELESSNESS HISTORY — $286,500 · OtherPEER HEALTH EXCHANGE INC — $200,000 · Other+85 more — $3,257,209 · Other+85 moreSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART — $617,500 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO MUSE…PROJECT HEALTHY MINDS — $270,000 · Arts & CulturePROJECT HEALTHY MI…ALONZO KING LINES BALLET — $260,000 · Arts & CultureALONZO KING LINES …THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION — $250,000 · Arts & CultureTHE BARACK OBAMA F…Jewish Film Institute — $175,000 · Arts & CultureJewish Film Instit…SAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY — $175,000 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO SYMP…KQED INC — $150,000 · Arts & CultureKQED INCSAN FRANCISCO JAZZ ORGANIZATION — $105,000 · Arts & Culture+14 more — $243,717 · Arts & Culture+14 moreSAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $735,000 · HealthSAN FRANCISCO …CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & RESEARCH CNTR FNDN — $484,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOS…EDGEWOOD CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES — $115,000 · HealthEDGEWOOD CENTE…LUMINARY IMPACT FUND — $100,000 · HealthLUMINARY IMPAC…+14 more — $329,000 · Health+14 moreUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $1,130,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF…TEACH FOR ALL INC — $200,000 · EducationTEACH FOR ALL…UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $100,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF…Life Learning Academy — $65,000 · Education+12 more — $146,300 · Education+12 moreThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $230,000 · InternationalIMPACTISRAEL INC — $190,000 · InternationalWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY — $155,000 · InternationalTilting Futures Incorporated — $120,000 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $100,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS — $50,000 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $35,000 · International+4 more — $35,400 · InternationalTHE CALIFORNIA PARTNERS PROJECT — $416,668 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES — $122,500 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO — $91,500 · Human Services+9 more — $72,000 · Human ServicesTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY — $115,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK — $58,000 · PhilanthropyBEND THE ARC - A JEWISH PARTNERSHIP FOR JUSTICE — $55,000 · PhilanthropyIMPACTASSETSINC — $50,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA — $18,000 · PhilanthropyWOMEN DONORS NETWORK — $15,000 · Philanthropy+5 more — $40,200 · Philanthropy
Other$5,932,709Arts & Culture$2,246,217Health$1,763,000Education$1,641,300International$915,400Human Services$702,668Philanthropy$351,200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $1,130,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $735,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART — $617,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & RESEARCH CNTR FNDN — $484,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetTHE CALIFORNIA PARTNERS PROJECT — $416,668 over 5y, 17% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF SAN FRANCISCO MARIN & PENINSULA — $352,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC — $300,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetALL CHICAGO MAKING HOMELESSNESS HISTORY — $286,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetPROJECT HEALTHY MINDS — $270,000 over 5y, 7.1% of budgetALONZO KING LINES BALLET — $260,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetFUTURES WITHOUT VIOLENCE — $260,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS — $250,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION — $250,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $230,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPEER HEALTH EXCHANGE INC — $200,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetTEACH FOR ALL INC — $200,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetIMPACTISRAEL INC — $190,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetJewish Film Institute — $175,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY — $175,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY — $155,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND — $150,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC — $150,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHONEYMOON ISRAEL FOUNDATION INC — $144,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetTURNAROUND FOR CHILDREN INC — $130,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES — $122,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND — $120,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTilting Futures Incorporated — $120,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY — $115,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetEDGEWOOD CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES — $115,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO JAZZ ORGANIZATION — $105,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUMINARY IMPACT FUND — $100,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLava Mae — $95,000 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO — $91,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FINANCE — $90,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetTHE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION — $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLife Learning Academy — $65,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetJEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK — $58,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Friends of Israel Philharmonic Orchestra — $55,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetBEND THE ARC - A JEWISH PARTNERSHIP FOR JUSTICE — $55,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetHomeless Prenatal Program Inc — $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS — $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAFE & SOUND — $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetIMPACTASSETSINC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREBOOT INC — $46,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetEPACENTER — $45,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

John Pritzker Family …Jewish Community Fede…Koret FoundationLisa & Douglas Goldma…The San Francisco Fou…Marin Community Found…Silicon Valley Commun…Mimi and Peter Haas F…The Shimon Ben Joseph…Bothin FoundationMcNabb FoundationHoward and Irene Levi…
John Pritzker Family FundCA71.9× affinity32 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: John Pritzker Family Fund · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Koret Foundation · Lisa & Douglas Goldman Fund · The San Francisco Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Mimi and Peter Haas Fund · The Shimon Ben Joseph Foundation Dba Jim Joseph Foundation · Bothin Foundation · McNabb Foundation · Howard and Irene Levine Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lisa Stone Pritzker Family Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Jewish Family & Children's Service Inc — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
36report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lisa Stone Pritzker Family Fund?

Find your warmest path to Lisa Stone Pritzker Family Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 184 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines