Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

THE INSTITUTE FOR THE REDESIGN OF LEARNING

THE INSTITUTE FOR THE REDESIGN OF LEARNING (California) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $151,685 to it, the largest being Pasadena Community Foundation ($45,027). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 53% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$21M
Funders on record
9
Grants received
$152k
Net assets
$13M
4/9 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 0%
01What it does

What The Institute for the Redesign of Learning does

Mission

- see schedule o - to empower individuals of all abilities to take charge of their own learning and lives, making it possible for them to be competent, caring, and contributing members of society; and to provide learning opportunities for families, professionals, and communities to support those efforts.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Almansor mental health services: offering a full array of therapeutic services for children, youth, and young adults ages 3-22 years, almansor mental health services contracts with the los angeles county department of mental health and other agencies, and strives to empower clients and families to "take charge" of their own success. Services are provided in irl schools, clinic and at over 100 public schools throughout los angeles county. Services are offered in english, spanish, cantonese, mandarin, and vietnamese; cultural sensitivity is emphasized.

    $7,690,015 spent$9,175,008 earned by the program
    44% of program spending
  2. Almansor academy: a non-public day school program funded by contracts with over 35 california public school districts, the almansor academy provides education and related services to students with learning, language, developmental, behavioral, and emotional needs. We serve individuals ages 5-22 years, and all education programs meet the referring school district and california state department of education curriculum standards, leading to a certificate of completion or high school diploma.

    $5,660,874 spent$6,300,358 earned by the program
    32% of program spending
  3. Almansor transition and adult services (tas)/almansor supported employment services: offering personal, vocational skills training, and supported employment services to youth and adults with developmental disabilities, emotional, or mental health issues, including autism spectrum disorders. The tas program is vendored through the eastern los angeles regional center and the california department of rehabilitation, and serves clients from surrounding regional centers and various department of rehabilitation service areas. Participants in tas are empowered to focus on and develop the social and adaptive skills necessary to live and work independently and experience the quality of life that they seek to obtain.

    $2,874,397 spent$3,413,573 earned by the program
    16% of program spending
  4. Almansor early childhood education services: designed to encourage the social, physical, emotional and intellectual growth and development of each child, we strive to create an atmosphere that allows each child's intellectual curiosity to flourish in a safe and nurturing environment. Serving children who are both typically developing and those with developmental disabilities, the program focuses on the innate worth of each individual child and honors the cultural diversity that allows us all to learn from each other and become competent, caring, and contributing members of society. We contract with local regional centers, head start organizations and accept private pay.

    $1,272,497 spent$1,180,311 earned by the program
    7% of program spending
  5. Almansor community outreach services: this program serves as a liaison for our local community and parent partnerships. Additionally, it oversees the implementation and monitoring requirements for specific funded program grants.

The 5 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $17,497,783.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($18M) Expenses 100 ($17M) Net assets 100 ($8.2M)2018 Revenue 101 ($18M) Expenses 105 ($18M) Net assets 104 ($8.5M)2019 Revenue 97 ($18M) Expenses 96 ($17M) Net assets 117 ($9.6M)2020 Revenue 102 ($19M) Expenses 104 ($18M) Net assets 124 ($10M)2021 Revenue 102 ($18M) Expenses 101 ($17M) Net assets 137 ($11M)2022 Revenue 109 ($20M) Expenses 108 ($19M) Net assets 151 ($12M)2023 Revenue 101 ($18M) Expenses 109 ($19M) Net assets 144 ($12M)2024 Revenue 111 ($20M) Expenses 112 ($19M) Net assets 153 ($13M)2025 Revenue 116 ($21M) Expenses 117 ($20M) Net assets 164 ($13M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (116)Expenses (117)Net assets (164)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $13M to $16M (+25%).

$10M
$11M
$12M
$13M
$13M
$16M
$17M
$17M
$18M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 6% · 2022 12% · 2023 1% · 2024 4% · 2025 3%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$954k
’17
$328k
’18
$1.0M
’19
$586k
’20
$1.1M
’21
$1.2M
’22
−$553k
’23
$787k
’24
$860k
’25
3.8
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed121091212111199
Joined·+1+1+3+1+0+0+1+1
No longer listed·32011031
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2019 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income fell $14k → $258.

4 of 9 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 53% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of THE INSTITUTE FOR THE REDESIGN OF LEARNING’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 8 of 9 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

THE INSTITUTE FOR THE REDESIGN OF LEARNING leans on a few funders — its largest provides 30% of grant income and the top three 70%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

77% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund THE INSTITUTE FOR THE REDESIGN OF LEARNING.

30%
largest funder
70%
top three
~5
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2019 100% · 2020 99% · 2021 38% · 2022 97% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

33% of THE INSTITUTE FOR THE REDESIGN OF LEARNING's funders are still giving 2 years after their first grant; 44% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

53% of THE INSTITUTE FOR THE REDESIGN OF LEARNING's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $71k that is directly attributable, 99% of it comes from California funders.

NY
CA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’21
’22
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $81k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like THE INSTITUTE FOR THE REDESIGN OF LEARNING

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

87% of spending goes to programs.

Program 87%Management 13%Fundraising 0%

Governance

7
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • Westmoreland Academy Fpc · corp_trust

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for THE INSTITUTE FOR THE REDESIGN OF LEARNING: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds THE INSTITUTE FOR THE REDESIGN OF LEARNING?
THE INSTITUTE FOR THE REDESIGN OF LEARNING (California) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $151,685 to it, the largest being Pasadena Community Foundation ($45,027). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 53% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does THE INSTITUTE FOR THE REDESIGN OF LEARNING have?
IRS filings report 9 organizations giving $151,685 in grants to THE INSTITUTE FOR THE REDESIGN OF LEARNING, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of THE INSTITUTE FOR THE REDESIGN OF LEARNING?
Pasadena Community Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $45,027 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like THE INSTITUTE FOR THE REDESIGN OF LEARNING find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Institute for the Redesign of Learning →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 9 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing