· Public charity
The Play Equity Fund
Bringing the transformational power of sport and play to all children, regardless of their race, gender, zip code or socio-economic status.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $35k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $80k
- $50k–250k16 grants · $1.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PROJECT BLUE - (FORMERLY KIDS & COPS MAKING A DIFFERENCE) | $110,200 |
| INGLEWOOD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT | $90,000 |
| LOS ANGELES PARKS FOUNDATION | $89,899 |
| PROYECTO PASTORAL | $60,200 |
| WOODCRAFT RANGERS | $60,200 |
| YMCA OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES | $60,200 |
| BOYLE HEIGHTS YOUTH FOOTBALL | $60,200 |
| HOLLENBECK POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE | $60,200 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WEST SAN GABRIEL VALLEY AND EASTSIDE | $60,200 |
| STREET SOCCER USA INC | $60,200 |
| EVERYBODY DANCE LA | $60,200 |
| AFTER-SCHOOL ALL-STARS LOS ANGELES | $60,200 |
| THINKWATTS FOUNDATION | $55,000 |
| INNER CITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| ESP EDUCATION & LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE - BOSS | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +70% since the first grant, against +47% for the ones you funded once.
27 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $207k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SSSTREET SOCCER USA INC4× · 2017–2024 · $376k · revenue +266%
- PBPROJECT BLUE CORPS3× · 2021–2024 · $320k · revenue +126% · 32% of their budget
- WRWOODCRAFT RANGERS3× · 2021–2024 · $235k · revenue +220%
Funded once
- PEPLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZEDone grant, 2022 · $361k · revenue -27%
- TGTHE GRYD FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -35%
- VBVARIETY BOYS & GIRLS CLUBgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +28%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Los Angeles Team Mentorings (LATM) mission is to guide middle school students growing up in challenging urban environments to recognize and reach their full potential. See Schedule O for more details.
Youth Emerging Stronger (YES) empowers young people, between ages of 12 and 24 within Los Angeles County, including but not limited to run-away and homeless youth. YES mission is to end homelessness one youth at a time to become…
Provide resources, education and services to the underserved African-American youth population in Los Angeles.
Inner-city arts believes that the arts and creativity are transformational, and we envision a society that honors the human capacity for creativity, and values its cultivation in the education of young people. inner-city arts uses arts…
The Workforce Development Board promotes workforce development activitieswhich connect Los Angeles jobseekers and youth to training, workforce preparedness and employment opportunities. Facilitates placing youth into private,public &…
Bresee battles poverty by empowering youth and families in LA with the skills, resources and relationships necessary to thrive.
Youth policy institute (ypi) transforms los angeles neighborhoods, reducing poverty by offering cradle to college & career services.
La's best provides free supervised before and after-school activities to over 15,000 children at 200 schools in los angeles unified school district (lausd).
Talent is equally distributed, but opportunity is not. STEM Advantage mentors, prepares, and inspires first-generation, low-income, and underserved college students for careers in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). We level…
The los angeles urban league (laul) is an independent affiliate of the national urban league. the laul was founded in 1921 to help african americans and others in underserved communities achieve their highest true social parity, economic…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is After-School All-Stars Los Angeles and the most unlike its peers is Glorya Kaufman Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
132 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 132 of the 140 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds STREET SOCCER USA INC ↗
- Who funds PLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZED ↗
- Who funds PROJECT BLUE CORPS ↗
- Who funds WOODCRAFT RANGERS ↗
- Who funds INNER CITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOLLENBECK POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds BOSS Inc ↗
- Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds SLOANE STEPHENS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds OUR OWN NON PROFIT INC ↗
- Who funds AFTER-SCHOOL ALL-STARS LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds BOYLE HEIGHTS YOUTH FOOTBALL ↗
- Who funds Friends of GALA ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Club of West San Gabriel Valley ↗
- Who funds Proyecto Pastoral ↗
- Who funds STUDENTS RUN AMERICA ↗
- Who funds EVERYBODY DANCE LA ↗
- Who funds THE GRYD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VARIETY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB ↗
- Who funds UNITED AMERICAN INDIAN INVOLVEMENT INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CARSON INC ↗
- Who funds ANTELOPE VALLEY PARTNERS FOR HEALTH ↗
- Who funds The Antelope Valley Boys and Girls Club ↗
- Who funds INGLEWOOD EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WHITTIER INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT JOY ↗
- Who funds LA PROMISE FUND ↗
- Who funds WATTS SKILLS ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds LEGACY LA YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
- Who funds Optimist Boys' Home and Ranch Inc ↗
- Who funds THINKWATTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA ULTIMATE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds 2ND CALL ↗
- Who funds LOVING HANDS COMMUNITY CARE INC ↗
- Who funds Angel City Alliance ↗
- Who funds JOVENES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Weingart Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · California Community Foundation · La84 Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · United Way Inc · The Los Angeles Dodgers Foundation · Great Public Schools Now · Elbridge Stuart Foundation Dba Stuart Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Play Equity Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.