· Public charity
La Clippers Foundation
The los angeles clippers foundation exists to foster and support community outreach programs & activities with positive educational, civic, environmental and humanitarian values that benefit and enhance the quality of life primarily for children in (cont.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k1 grant · $35k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $518k
- $250k+5 grants · $4.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LOS ANGELES COUNTY PARKS FOUNDATION | $1,310,000 |
| MADRID EQUIPMENT RENTAL INC | $1,298,389 |
| VISION TO LEARN | $975,000 |
| CA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES | $525,000 |
| Z BEST HARDWOOD FLOOR | $266,742 |
| YMCA-LA | $200,000 |
| MORNINGSIDE MONARCHS | $117,600 |
| ANAHEIM FAMILY YMCA | $100,000 |
| DRIVING FORCE GROUP INC | $100,000 |
| STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION | $34,721 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $2.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.
34 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 30 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.3M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
VISION TO LEARN5× · 2018–2025 · $5.7M · revenue +250%- YMYoung Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles6× · 2018–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +5%
CITY YEAR INC2× · 2018–2019 · $641k · revenue +8%
Funded once
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTIONone grant, 2021 · $1.0M · revenue +8%- AFALL FOR KIDS ORGANIZATIONone grant, 2023 · $1.0M · revenue +8%
- SSSCIENCE SPARKgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $207k · revenue +34%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Los Angeles Team Mentorings (LATM) mission is to guide middle school students growing up in challenging urban environments to recognize and reach their full potential. See Schedule O for more details.
To make positive interventions in the lives of young people by offering alternatives to gangs and violence. legacy la builds the capacity of youth to reach their full potential and equips them with tools to transform their lives and…
La's best provides free supervised before and after-school activities to over 15,000 children at 200 schools in los angeles unified school district (lausd).
To advance educational equity. together with families, schools and the community, facilitate access to and opportunities for quality educational and wellness practices so that children thrive from diapers to diplomas.
Talent is equally distributed, but opportunity is not. STEM Advantage mentors, prepares, and inspires first-generation, low-income, and underserved college students for careers in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). We level…
Arts for la leads communities, artists and organizations to advocate for an equitable, healthy, and creative los angeles region through the arts.
To ensure student success by building authentic partnerships between families, educators, and system leaders, and through parent-led advocacy.
The la conservation corps creates equitable opportunities for young people to build resilience in themselves, their communities and the environment through a program of work, education and support.
The los angeles urban league (laul) is an independent affiliate of the national urban league. the laul was founded in 1921 to help african americans and others in underserved communities achieve their highest true social parity, economic…
The organization is a non-partisan, membership based speakers' forum that connects business leaders, community members, and engaged individuals with shared interest in local, national, and global affairs. it provides an open and accessible…
To improve the lives of young people in greater los angeles by creating impactful programs that will help them pursue their dreams while building fundamental life skills.
The california association of latino superintendents and administrators (calsa) is a community of diverse educational leaders skilled in addressing the needs of latino/latina students and dedicated to increasing the number of highly…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is I Have a Dream Foundation - Los Angeles and the most unlike its peers is Team Griffin Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
114 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 114 of the 124 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LOS ANGELES PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VISION TO LEARN ↗
- Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
- Who funds ALL FOR KIDS ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds CITY YEAR INC ↗
- Who funds THE PLAY EQUITY FUND ↗
- Who funds Driving Force Group Inc ↗
- Who funds LEARN FRESH EDUCATION CO ↗
- Who funds SCIENCE SPARK ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR URBAN DEBATE LEAGUES ↗
- Who funds Da Vinci Schools Fund ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES BROTHERHOOD CRUSADE - BLACK UNITED FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ANA ↗
- Who funds Ron Brown Scholar Fund ↗
- Who funds PS Science ↗
- Who funds 2ND CALL ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF LOS ANGELES INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds COACHING CORPS ↗
- Who funds CASA HOGAR MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds THE LOS ANGELES DODGERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds WE CARE OUTREACH MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds THE MAYOR'S FUND FOR LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds POSITIVE COACHING ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds READING IS FUNDAMENTAL OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC ↗
- Who funds INNER-CITY ARTS ↗
- Who funds OUR OWN NON PROFIT INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED IN HARMONY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Elbridge Stuart Foundation Dba Stuart Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · California Community Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · Weingart Foundation · The Crail-Johnson Foundation · The Los Angeles Dodgers Foundation · The Green Foundation · S Mark Taper Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization La Clippers Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to La Clippers Foundation?
Find your warmest path to La Clippers Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.