· Public charity
Kirkpatrick Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc
Support the oklahoma city community foundation by investing in ideas and leadership that contribute to and advance the cultural, intellectual and social interest of the communities we support.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $52k
- $10k–50k71 grants · $1.5M
- $50k–250k15 grants · $1.5M
- $250k+11 grants · $9.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $3,982,672 |
| OKLAHOMA CONTEMPORARY ARTS CENTER | $1,200,000 |
| ST ANTHONY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $1,000,000 |
| GREEN BOX | $825,000 |
| SCIENCE MUSEUM OKLAHOMA | $514,000 |
| CROOKED OAK PUBLIC SCHOOLS | $450,000 |
| MOLLIE SPENCER FARM INC | $447,500 |
| VARIETY CARE | $275,000 |
| HONESTLY INC | $255,000 |
| FINE ARTS INSTITUTE OF EDMOND | $250,000 |
| ALLIED ARTS OF OKLAHOMA INC | $250,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS | $200,000 |
| ALPHA OMICRON CHAPTER OF KAPPA ALPHA THETA EDUCATIONAL FUND | $150,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA | $150,000 |
| OKLAHOMANS FOR THE ARTS | $114,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $2.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
131 repeat relationships — 86 still active in FY2025, 45 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $989k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GBGREEN BOX ARTS PROJECT7× · 2019–2025 · $3.7M · revenue +38% · 77% of their budget
- MSMOLLIE SPENCER FARM INC7× · 2019–2025 · $2.6M · revenue +127% · 100% of their budget
- VCVariety Care Inc4× · 2022–2025 · $2.2M · revenue +46%
Funded once
- HFHarding Fine Arts Academy Foundationone grant, 2023 · $500k · revenue +8%
- OPOKLAHOMA PHILHARMONIC AFFILIATED FUND OF OCCF INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $333k · revenue +141%
- HMHEALTHY MINDS HEALTHY LIVES FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $300k · revenue -87%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.
The organization's mission is to create and champion a vibrant and diverse downtown through placemaking, advocacy, and promotion.
To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.
The oklahoma hall of fame preserves oklahomas unique history while promoting pride in our great state through each of its programs and the gaylord-pickens museum. the association honors our states rich tradition by telling oklahomas story…
A contemporary fine craft community arts organization dedicated to fine craft; showcase local, state, regional, and national artists; and creating a community of partnerships with artists, curators, arts, and social service organizations.…
Oklahoma policy advances equitable and fiscally responsible policies that expand opportunity for all oklahomans through nonpartisan research, analysis, and advocacy.
To promote the self-sufficiency of the socially, economically, and culturally disadvantaged citizens of oklahoma and canadian counties and to eliminate the paradox of poverty among these citizens by opening to everyone the opportunity to…
Economic development in okmulgee county
The mission of the oklahoma community service commission is to engage oklahomans of all ages and backgrounds in community-based service which supports americorps programs in oklahoma communities. services may include assisting with…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Restoreokc Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wildlife Conservation Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
190 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 190 of the 210 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA CONTEMPORARY ARTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds GREEN BOX ARTS PROJECT ↗
- Who funds MOLLIE SPENCER FARM INC ↗
- Who funds Variety Care Inc ↗
- Who funds ALLIED ARTS OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds HONESTLY INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS ↗
- Who funds THE ST ANTHONY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc ↗
- Who funds BALLET OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds Variety Care Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds SCIENCE MUSEUM OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds Harding Fine Arts Academy Foundation ↗
- Who funds TEEN EMPOWER INC ↗
- Who funds FINE ARTS INSTITUTE OF EDMOND ↗
- Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA REPERTORY THEATRE GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMANS FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA PHILHARMONIC AFFILIATED FUND OF OCCF INC ↗
- Who funds TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HEALTHY MINDS HEALTHY LIVES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN BETTER LIVING CENTER ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA SHAKESPEARE IN THE PARK INC ↗
- Who funds Oklahoma Humanities Council Inc ↗
- Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA CHILDRENS THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds ARTS COUNCIL OF OKLAHOMA CITY ↗
- Who funds WILLIAM FREMONT HARN GARDENS INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Inasmuch Foundation · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · American Fidelity Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Sarkeys Foundation · Harris Foundation Inc · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Wegener Foundation Inc · The Merrick Foundation · Love Meyer Family Foundation · Cresap Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Kirkpatrick Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hunger Free Oklahoma Inc — 100% of income from government
- Oklahoma Humanities Council Inc — 91% of income from government
- Sunbeam Family Services Inc — 52% of income from government
- Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation — 31% of income from government
- Oklahoma City Family Justice Center Inc — 14% of income from government
- Tulsa Community Foundation — 11% of income from government
- Variety Care Inc — 9% of income from government
- Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma — 8% of income from government
- Remerge Inc — 7% of income from government
- Central Oklahoma American Indian Health Council Inc — 5% of income from government
- Pivot Inc — 2% of income from government
- Family & Childrens Services Inc — 1% of income from government
- First Americans Museum Foundation — 1% of income from government
- Special Care Inc — 0% of income from government
- Goodwill Industries of Central Oklahoma Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.