· Private foundation
The Merrick Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k33 grants · $76k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $355k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION | $79,000 |
| CHARLES B GODDARD CENTER FOR THE VI | $75,000 |
| OSU FOUNDATION | $75,000 |
| MID-AMERICA CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY | $75,000 |
| OMRF | $51,000 |
| LIGHTHOUSE BEHAVIORAL WELLNESS CENT | $10,000 |
| FAMILY SHELTER OF SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA | $10,000 |
| POSSIBILITIES INC | $9,000 |
| GRACE CENTER OF SOUTHERN OK INC | $5,000 |
| GUTS CHURCH | $4,000 |
| SOUTHEASTERN FOUNDATION INC | $4,000 |
| CHRIST CHURCH EPISCOPAL | $4,000 |
| CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $4,000 |
| APOSTOLIC NETWORK OF GLOBAL AWAKENI | $4,000 |
| AMERICAN LEBANESE SYRIAN ASSOCIATED | $4,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $284k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.
96 repeat relationships — 32 still active in FY2024, 64 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $86k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OSOklahoma State University Foundation6× · 2018–2024 · $216k · revenue +74%
REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC7× · 2017–2024 · $105k · revenue +47%- LBLighthouse Behavioral Wellness Centers4× · 2021–2024 · $85k · revenue +131%
Funded once
- NANorman Alcohol Information Center Incone grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +22%
- CCCITY CARE INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +82%
- CCCare Center-Child Abuse Response and Evaluation Inc DBA The CARE Centerone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +5%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The purpose of the organization is to provide hope-centered, trauma-informed, child-first services that unite law enforcement, child protective services (state and tribal), prosecutors, mental health professionals, and medical…
The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.
To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.
To provide a statewide voice for children by enhancing & sustaining the growth of local casa programs which provide trained community volunteers to represent the best interests of abused & neglected children.
The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.
Family Hope House empowers families through therapy, education, and advocacy. As Oklahoma's sole adoption competent mental health agency, we support foster and adoptive children for lasting stability and success.
To revitalize urban oklahoma city neighborhoods and create affordable housing opportunities by rehabilitating historic homes, constructing new homes, and increasing community investment through home ownership.
Works to ensure that all children and youth in Oklahoma have access to safe and enriching learning opportunities during their out-of-school time.
La Luz Organization helps the underserved Latino population in Oklahoma with culturally and faith based trauma-informed services to victims of domestic violence,sexual assault and stalking.
To improve the lives of children and youth in oklahoma's child welfare system by providing resources and building community.
Youth & family services, inc. provides emergency shelter, counseling, delinquency prevention, independent living, and education programs to children with special needs and at-risk youth.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Restoreokc Inc and the most unlike its peers is Pi Beta Phi Foundation of Okc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
121 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 121 of the 173 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Oklahoma State University Foundation ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds Lighthouse Behavioral Wellness Centers ↗
- Who funds Mid-America Christian University Inc ↗
- Who funds FOOD AND RESOURCE CENTER OF SOUTH CENTRAL OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY YOUTH SERVICES OF SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SHELTER OF SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA ↗
- Who funds A CHANCE TO CHANGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds GRACE CENTER OF SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL CARE INC ↗
- Who funds United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc ↗
- Who funds THE MORE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DORNICK HILLS HISTORICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CLEATS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CASA OF SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEASTERN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ARBUCKLE LIFE SOLUTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds INTEGRIS Health Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds PIVOT INC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MEMPHIS ↗
- Who funds The Dragonfly Home Inc ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY ↗
- Who funds REMERGE INC ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA HALL OF FAME ↗
- Who funds POSITIVE TOMORROWS INC ↗
- Who funds FIELDS & FUTURES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Keystone Adventure School & Farm Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Inasmuch Foundation · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · American Fidelity Foundation · Sarkeys Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Harris Foundation Inc · Cresap Family Foundation · Wegener Foundation Inc · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Love Meyer Family Foundation · The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Merrick Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Sunbeam Family Services Inc — 52% of income from government
- Newview Oklahoma Inc — 45% of income from government
- It's My Community Initiative Inc — 23% of income from government
- Oklahoma City Family Justice Center Inc — 14% of income from government
- Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma — 8% of income from government
- Remerge Inc — 7% of income from government
- Good Shepherd Community Clinicinc — 5% of income from government
- Lighthouse Behavioral Wellness Centers — 2% of income from government
- Pivot Inc — 2% of income from government
- Oklahoma City National Memorial Foundation — 1% of income from government
- Oklahoma Arts Institute Inc — 1% of income from government
- Special Care Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Merrick Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Merrick Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.