· Private foundation
Wegener Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k8 grants · $45k
- $10k–50k36 grants · $440k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HEARTS FOR HEARING FOUNDATION | $40,000 |
| WINGS SPECIAL NEEDS COMMUNITY INC | $40,000 |
| PIVOT INC | $15,000 |
| PIVOT INC | $15,000 |
| TWIN CEDARS INC FORMERLY CENTRAL OKLAHOMA CAMP AND CONFERENCE CENTER | $15,000 |
| SISU YOUTH INC | $15,000 |
| NOT YOUR AVERAGE JOE | $10,000 |
| CALM WATERS CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES | $10,000 |
| YMCA OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY | $10,000 |
| CASA VOICES FOR CHILDREN INC | $10,000 |
| DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL OK | $10,000 |
| HOMELESS ALLIANCE | $10,000 |
| GENESIS PROJECT | $10,000 |
| SPECIAL CARE INC | $10,000 |
| METRO TECHNOLOGY CENTERS FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
90 repeat relationships — 37 still active in FY2024, 53 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Hearts for Hearing Foundation8× · 2017–2024 · $140k · revenue +291%
CITY RESCUE MISSION INC7× · 2017–2023 · $98k · revenue +40%
LITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC8× · 2017–2024 · $90k · revenue +69%
Funded once
- OCOK CRISIS NURSERY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2019 · $10k
- RTREDEEMING THE FAMILYgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +43%
- OCOKLAHOMA CATTLEMEN'S ASSOCIATION INgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +38%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Family Hope House empowers families through therapy, education, and advocacy. As Oklahoma's sole adoption competent mental health agency, we support foster and adoptive children for lasting stability and success.
The mission of the okcfjc is to provide protection, hope and healing to those impacted by domestic and family violence in the oklahoma city community. the organization provides a centrally located facility which co-locates and coordinates…
The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.
Our Mission is for all Oklahoma families to have access to quality care and education for their children through community-based resource and referral services; with a vision of Oklahoma communities supporting the development and learning…
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.
Lighthouse Behavioral Wellness Centers, Inc. serves the community behavioral health needs of nine counties of Southern Oklahoma. Lighthouse offers integrated care through their outpatient and Health Home programs to adults and children.…
The programs and services of OPC are based on the concept of educating parents to improve their child's quality of life. Our mission is to train, educate and support parents, families, professionals and consumers in building partnerships…
The purpose of the organization is to provide hope-centered, trauma-informed, child-first services that unite law enforcement, child protective services (state and tribal), prosecutors, mental health professionals, and medical…
Tulsa casa is organized to speak for the best interests of abused and neglected children in court. we promote and support volunteer representation for the children in an effort to provide each child a safe, permanent, nurturing home.
Solicit, train & direct activities of court-appointed volunteer advocates for children in cases involving child abuse and neglect. assist in direct expense needs of individual children in court-appointed cases.
Our mission is to eliminate family violence, stalking, child abuse, and sexual assault through advocacy, education, counseling, support and prevention services.
Crisis intervention services and full shelter for victims and their children of domestic violence/sexual assault. Advocates for abused children in the court system.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Restoreokc Inc and the most unlike its peers is Not Your Average Joe. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
90 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 90 of the 141 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Hearts for Hearing Foundation ↗
- Who funds CITY RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds LITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds PIVOT INC ↗
- Who funds WINGS SPECIAL NEEDS COMMUNITY INC ↗
- Who funds PEPPERS RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds LIMBS FOR LIFE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOPE IS ALIVE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds POSITIVE TOMORROWS INC ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL CARE INC ↗
- Who funds EXCHANGE CLUB CENTER FOR THE PREVENTION OF CHILD ABUSE OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Care Center-Child Abuse Response and Evaluation Inc DBA The CARE Center ↗
- Who funds TWIN CEDARS INC ↗
- Who funds The Children's Center Inc ↗
- Who funds ASPIRING ATTITUDES INC ↗
- Who funds CITY CARE INC ↗
- Who funds Little Light Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds THE ANNA'S HOUSE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Daily Living Centers Inc ↗
- Who funds A CHANCE TO CHANGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RESTOREOKC INC ↗
- Who funds NEWVIEW OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds THE EDEN CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds The Center of Family Love ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds SISU YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds The Meadows Center for Opportunity Inc ↗
- Who funds THE RIGHT PATH RIDING ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds CALM WATERS CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds Health Alliance for the Uninsured ↗
- Who funds CASA VOICES FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Sarkeys Foundation · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Inasmuch Foundation · Harris Foundation Inc · Love Meyer Family Foundation · American Fidelity Foundation · Kirkpatrick Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · The Merrick Foundation · Cresap Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Wegener Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Dale Rogers Training Center Inc — 79% of income from government
- Crossroads Youth & Family Services Inc — 78% of income from government
- Sunbeam Family Services Inc — 52% of income from government
- Newview Oklahoma Inc — 45% of income from government
- Tulsa Day Center Inc — 9% of income from government
- Remerge Inc — 7% of income from government
- Theatre Tulsa Inc — 2% of income from government
- Pivot Inc — 2% of income from government
- Special Care Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Wegener Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Wegener Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.