How much did INASMUCH FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 46% of INASMUCH FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2021

fellowshipsustainingelijah orthodoxorthodox churchcares partnersweather febwilliam

2022

part-timesigmabowtie ballexcellenceunderremerge diversionfeeding

2023

symposiumypo tradetrade showcrisis nurserykickoffcapital vivaadmission folklife

2024

two-yearinstallmentdesignworkforcecontinuumfuel okchealth sciences

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 175 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k75 grants · $153k
$10k–50k32 grants · $584k
$50k–250k51 grants · $4.8M
$250k+17 grants · $13M

$15,000

Median grant

States reached

$507M

Total assets

Largest grants

FUEL OKC$2,000,000
UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION$2,000,000
CROSSROADS RENEWAL PROJECT$1,850,000
THE VERGE FOUNDATION$1,150,000
KEY TO HOME (CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY)$1,000,000
OKLAHOMA CITY NATIONAL MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$750,000
OKLAHOMA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY$500,000
DEAN MCGEE EYE INSTITUTE FOUNDATION$500,000
UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION$500,000
CENTER OF FAMILY LOVE$500,000
REMERGE$500,000
SANTA FE SOUTH SCHOOLS$400,000
RAINBOW FLEET$400,000
HEALTHY MINDS POLICY INITIATIVE$300,000
REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA$268,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $9.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 11%. 91% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$64M · 248 repeat orgs$12M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +46% for the ones you funded once.

248 repeat relationships — 104 still active in FY2024, 144 since wound down; 35 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

248

169

Total granted

$64M

$5.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%

+46%

Still filing today

61%

48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6.3M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

UO
UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION
4× · 2021–2024 · $3.9M · revenue +57%
CC
COLORADO COLLEGE
3× · 2021–2023 · $2.1M · revenue +24%
OKLAHOMA CITY NATIONAL MEMORIAL FOUNDATION
4× · 2021–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +16%

Funded once

HM
HEALTHY MINDS HEALTHY LIVES FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $1.0M · revenue +1371557%
VC
VARIETY CARE FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $400k · revenue +80% · 26% of their budget
PI
PARTNERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH
one grant, 2022 · $287k · revenue -61%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

University of Tulsa

The University of Tulsa is a student-centered research university that cultivates interconnected learning experiences to explore complex ideas and create new knowledge in a spirit of free inquiry. Guided by our commitment to diversity,…

Education

Oklahoma Christian University

Oklahoma Christian University Exists to educate, mentor, and inspire students to fulfill their potential and transform their lives through Christian faith, scholarship, and service.

Education

Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc

To serve the charitable needs of our donors and the oklahoma city area through the development and administration of endowments and other charitable funds with the goal of enhancing value.

Philanthropy

Oklahoma Visual Arts Coalition

The Oklahoma Visual Arts Coalition grows and develops Oklahoma's visual arts community through education, promotion, connection, and funding.

Arts & Culture

Downtown Oklahoma City Inc

The organization's mission is to create and champion a vibrant and diverse downtown through placemaking, advocacy, and promotion.

Community Improvement

Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and

To be the unified voice of business & the most effective advocacy organization at the Capitol

—

Oklahoma Blood Institute

To be the donor to patient lifeline by meeting blood transfusion and health care needs.

Health

Oklahoma Baptist University

A Christian Liberal Arts University.

Education

Oklahoma Mental Health Council

To provide high quality, technology driven, evidence-based practices so all oklahomans will achieve better health and wellness.

Health

Diversity Center of Oklahoma Inc

Health

Oklahoma Academy for State Goals

To provide information to citizens. The organization encourages the utilization and developement of the State of Oklahomas resourses.

—

Oklahoma Energy Education Foundation

To raise public awareness of energy issues, to educate the general public of the importance of the oil gas industry, to encourage the efficient use of energy, to promote environmentally sound production methods and technologies, and to…

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Leadership Oklahoma City Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wesleyan University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.7%2/270

the rest of the field

11%

2,144/19,152

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

250 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

243/250

Grantees still filing

197/250

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$39,920,221Education$12,555,206Human Services$9,527,599Arts & Culture$8,715,253Community Improvement$2,031,904Crime & Legal$1,948,784Environment$1,858,150

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oklahoma City Community Foundation IncOK155.5× affinity99 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Kirkpatrick Family Affiliated Fund Of · American Fidelity Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Kirkpatrick Foundation Inc · Sarkeys Foundation · Harris Foundation Inc · Love Meyer Family Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Love Family Affiliated Fund · Wegener Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation INASMUCH FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

93get no government money at all

1rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: OKLAHOMA NEWSPAPER FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~43 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 736103398 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on OKLAHOMA NEWSPAPER FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 43 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 87% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Inasmuch Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Inasmuch Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

INASMUCH FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

250 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Inasmuch Foundation?

More from the funding graph

INASMUCH FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

250 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Inasmuch Foundation?

More from the funding graph