Skip to content
Jpmorgan Chase Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$193M
Granted FY2025still arriving
11,076
Grants FY2025still arriving
52
States reached
$2.2M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Community Improvement$465MEmployment$325MHousing & Shelter$174MEducation$156MPhilanthropy$122MHealth$60MHuman Services$50MInternational$49MOther$0
02FY2025 · 11076 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10300 grants · $11M
  • $10k–50k233 grants · $4.2M
  • $50k–250k289 grants · $42M
  • $250k+254 grants · $135M
$600
Median grant
52
States reached
$1.1B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CAREERS AND ENTERPRISE COMPANY LIMITED$2,197,332
CODE FOR AMERICA LABS INC$2,000,000
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP OF ALABAMA FOUNDATION$2,000,000
THE CHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,750,000
ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC$1,675,000
NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY$1,500,000
COMMIT2DALLAS$1,500,000
RECLAIMING CHICAGO NFP$1,375,000
VIBRANT EMOTIONAL HEALTH$1,368,000
POSSIBILITY LABS$1,359,160
THE URBAN INSTITUTE$1,300,000
GIVE2ASIA$1,180,911
GREATER WASHINGTON PARTNERSHIP$1,180,000
CLIMATE JOBS NATIONAL RESOURCE CENTER INC$1,145,000
THE CAREERS AND ENTERPRISE COMPANY LIMITED$1,108,046
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 85% of grant dollars ($1.4B). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 15% that went abroad ($249M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $53.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%POSSIBILITY LABS: $1.4M → 9%HOUSING CALIFORNIA: $725k → 12%LEVITICUS 25-23 ALTERNATIVE FUND INC: $500k → 9%PUBLIC ALLIES INC: $500k → 17%URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER SOUTHWESTERN OHIO: $500k → 16%FRESH START WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $525k → 11%MIAMI HOMES FOR ALL INC: $1.0M → 15%EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA: $500k → 9%FRESH START WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $525k → 11%MIAMI HOMES FOR ALL INC: $500k → 15%ALLIANCE OF COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES INC: $750k → 16%MIAMI HOMES FOR ALL INC: $500k → 15%SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURS OF NEW ORLEANS INC: $500k → 23%CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC: $500k → 11%SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURS OF NEW ORLEANS INC: $500k → 23%SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURS OF NEW ORLEANS INC: $500k → 23%MI CASA RESOURCE CENTER: $500k → 12%MI CASA RESOURCE CENTER: $500k → 12%SOUTHWEST ECONOMIC SOLUTIONS: $500k → 21%CHANGE MACHINE: $825k → 20%CHANGE MACHINE: $751k → 20%BAY AREA COUNCIL FOUNDATION: $500k → 10%OHIO EXCELS: $500k → 15%MIAMI HOMES FOR ALL INC: $600k → 15%BAY AREA COUNCIL FOUNDATION: $500k → 10%LOUISIANA HOMEBUYER EDUCATION COLLABORATIVE INC: $1.0M → 23%LOUISIANA HOMEBUYER EDUCATION COLLABORATIVE INC: $575k → 23%LOUISIANA HOMEBUYER EDUCATION COLLABORATIVE INC: $500k → 23%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $733k → 17%OHIO EXCELS: $500k → 15%LOUISIANA HOMEBUYER EDUCATION COLLABORATIVE INC: $500k → 23%START SMALL THINK BIG INC: $650k → 17%WORKING SOLUTIONS CDFI: $2.8M → 10%REAL ESTATE COUNCIL COMMUNITY FUND: $3.5M → 14%YWCA SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $500k → 15%ETHIOPIAN TEWAHEDO SOCIAL SERVICES: $500k → 15%TREC COMMUNITY INVESTORS: $2.5M → 14%START SMALL THINK BIG INC: $500k → 17%CHICAGO COMMONS ASSOCIATION: $983k → 14%CHICAGO COMMONS ASSOCIATION: $983k → 14%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $778k → 17%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $775k → 17%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $750k → 17%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $750k → 17%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $1.2M → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $1.0M → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $524k → 14%MERIT AMERICA: $750k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 15% of all-years giving ($249M)

45 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
United Kingdom$53M · 150 grants
France$49M · 150 grants
GB$22M · 57 grants
Germany$21M · 77 grants
Italy$12M · 44 grants
Spain$8.6M · 43 grants
Belgium$8.4M · 22 grants
Brazil$7.8M · 30 grants
Canada$6.4M · 54 grants
Hong Kong$6.2M · 17 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6B · 1478 repeat orgs$112M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

1478 repeat relationships: 674 still active in FY2025, 804 since wound down; 91 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

1478
355

Total granted

$1.6B
$85M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+7%

Still filing today

76%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementEducationHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterEmploymentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $28M · revenue +135%
  • THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $24M · revenue +243%
  • ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $24M · revenue +153%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CAREERS AND ENTERPRISE COMPANY
    one grant, 2021 · $1.9M
  • MS
    Main Street Launchgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $1.2M · revenue +27%
  • TS
    THE SOCIETY FOR COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION LIMITED
    one grant, 2020 · $1.0M
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Indiana Corporate

The central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is transforming our regional economy, bringing together the ceos of central indiana's largest and most civically engaged employers and university presidents to advance "big picture"…

Community Improvement
2
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
3
United Food Bank

Uniting communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
4
New York City Energy Efficiency

Delivering financing solutions and advancing markets for energy efficiency and clean energy.

Environment
5
Land Bank Twin Cities Inc

Land bank twin cities, inc. captures strategic real estate opportunities to benefit people with low to moderate incomes, prioritizing people of color and populations facing barriers.

Housing & Shelter
6
The Common Application Inc

The common application promotes access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process.

Education
7
Abilities Network Inc

To cultivate inclusive communities through relationships, innovation and high-quality services.

Health
8
Community Development

Cdcli invests in the housing and economic aspirations of individuals and families by providing solutions that foster and maintain vibrant, eguitable, and sustainable communities.

Community Improvement
9
Chief Executives for Corporate

Cecp's mission is to create a better world through business. cecp is a ceo-led coalition that believes that a company's social strategy how it engages with key stakeholders, including employees, communities, investors, and customers…

Philanthropy
10
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Fighting hunger, improving lives, strengthening communities.

Food & Nutrition
11
Council for Court Excellence

Bring people together to research, educate, & advocate for a fair, equitable dc legal system.

—
12
Enterprise Community Investment Inc

Enterprise's mission is to make home and community places of pride, power and belonging, and platforms for resilience and upward mobility for all low and moderate income people.all our efforts support our strategic goals to increase…

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Support Center for Nonprofit Management Inc; the most unlike its peers is International Tennis Hall of Fame. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

1474 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1474 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

177
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
369
Early backer (in before they grew)
1444/1474
Grantees still filing
1016/1474
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION: $28,241,235 · Community ImprovementLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT C…ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $23,764,120 · Community ImprovementENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNE…NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR LATINO COMMUNITY ASSET BUILDERS: $8,600,002 · Community ImprovementPROSPERITY NOW: $8,015,910 · Community Improvement+36 more: $151,963,570 · Community Improvement+36 moreUNIDOSUS: $14,506,290 · OtherCHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $12,809,140 · OtherTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $23,937,930 · OtherTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INCTHE URBAN INSTITUTE: $12,950,000 · OtherGIVE2ASIA: $13,247,091 · Other+77 more: $297,514,149 · Other+77 moreCOUNCIL OF CHIEF STATE SCHOOL OFFICERS: $21,800,000 · EducationCOUNCIL OF C…COMMIT2DALLAS: $13,751,886 · EducationCOMMIT2DALLA…LINCOLN INSTITUTE OF LAND POLICY: $7,500,000 · EducationLINCOLN INST…EDVESTORS INC: $7,500,000 · EducationEDVESTORS IN…Research Foundation of the City University of New York: $5,308,334 · EducationResearch Fou…UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $4,034,673 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $3,620,258 · EducationCONGRESS HEIGHTS COMMUNITY TRAINING: $3,500,000 · EducationBUSINESS - HIGHER EDUCATION FORUM: $3,395,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $3,336,030 · Education+10 more: $25,577,276 · Education+10 moreThe Resurrection Project: $8,841,840 · Housing & ShelterThe Resur…Coalition for Nonprofit Housing and: $7,960,000 · Housing & ShelterCoalition…CINNAIRE LENDING CORPORATION: $5,500,000 · Housing & ShelterCINNAIRE …COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,158,200 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY…STEWARDS OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR THE FUTURE: $4,750,000 · Housing & ShelterSTEWARDS …ATLANTA NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP INC: $4,500,000 · Housing & ShelterATLANTA N…NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP HOUSING SERVICES INC: $4,385,000 · Housing & ShelterNEIGHBORH…FAMILY HOUSING FUND: $4,000,000 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF BROWNSVILLE DBA COME DREAM COME BUILD: $3,720,000 · Housing & ShelterPARITY BALTIMORE INCORPORATED: $3,400,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE CENTER FOR NEW YORK CITY NEIGHBORHOODS INC: $3,213,250 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY INVESTMENT CORPORATION: $3,200,000 · Housing & ShelterPEOPLE UNITED FOR SUSTAINABLE HOUSING INC: $3,000,000 · Housing & ShelterUNITED HOUSING INC: $3,000,000 · Housing & ShelterNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY: $2,590,500 · Housing & Shelter+4 more: $9,740,118 · Housing & Shelter+4 moreSEATTLE FOUNDATION: $7,341,900 · PhilanthropyCentral Valley Community Foundation A Corporation: $5,700,000 · PhilanthropyAmalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc: $4,610,000 · PhilanthropyTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC: $3,985,325 · PhilanthropyIMPACT CHARITABLE: $3,679,075 · PhilanthropyColumbus State Community College Development Foundation Inc: $3,403,220 · PhilanthropyARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3,319,980 · PhilanthropyThe Chicago Community Trust: $3,310,550 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN: $3,050,450 · PhilanthropyMETRO UNITED WAY INC: $3,009,165 · PhilanthropyDENVER PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $2,351,510 · PhilanthropyASSET FUNDERS NETWORK: $2,300,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY MIAMI INC: $2,289,138 · PhilanthropyBoston Foundation Inc: $2,185,100 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,074,443 · PhilanthropyIndianapolis Private Industry Council: $8,090,000 · EmploymentJOBS FOR THE FUTURE INC: $7,192,190 · EmploymentPER SCHOLAS INC: $4,880,328 · EmploymentWTIA WORKFORCE INSTITUTE: $4,450,000 · EmploymentYOUTHBUILD GLOBAL INC: $3,342,003 · EmploymentSKILLS FOR CHICAGO: $3,297,752 · EmploymentHIRE360: $3,250,100 · EmploymentDETROIT EMPLOYMENT SOLUTIONS CORPORATION: $2,750,000 · EmploymentNORTH LAWNDALE EMPLOYMENT NETWORK: $2,241,000 · EmploymentNATIONAL FUND FOR WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS: $2,110,000 · EmploymentWORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL SEATTLE-KI: $2,100,000 · EmploymentTREC COMMUNITY INVESTORS: $6,643,066 · Human ServicesNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $4,003,930 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $3,953,179 · Human ServicesMIAMI HOMES FOR ALL INC: $3,847,200 · Human ServicesWORKING SOLUTIONS CDFI: $3,835,000 · Human ServicesHousingNOLA: $3,500,000 · Human ServicesChange Machine: $3,079,900 · Human ServicesPOSSIBILITY LABS: $2,809,160 · Human ServicesOHIO EXCELS: $2,650,000 · Human ServicesSTART SMALL THINK BIG INC: $2,469,830 · Human ServicesSOCIAL ENTREPRENEURS OF NEW ORLEANS: $2,360,250 · Human ServicesHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $2,250,433 · Human ServicesChicago Commons Association: $2,215,450 · Human Services
Community Improvement$220,584,837Other$374,964,600Education$99,323,457Housing & Shelter$76,958,908Philanthropy$52,609,856Employment$43,703,373Human Services$43,617,398

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION: $28,241,235 over 9y, 4.2% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $23,937,930 over 9y, 3.2% of budgetENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $23,764,120 over 9y, 5.8% of budgetCOUNCIL OF CHIEF STATE SCHOOL OFFICERS: $21,800,000 over 3y, 24% of budgetUNIDOSUS: $14,506,290 over 9y, 4.7% of budgetCOMMIT2DALLAS: $13,751,886 over 9y, 11% of budgetGIVE2ASIA: $13,247,091 over 6y, 8.1% of budgetTHE URBAN INSTITUTE: $12,950,000 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetThe Resurrection Project: $8,841,840 over 8y, 16% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR LATINO COMMUNITY ASSET BUILDERS: $8,600,002 over 8y, 15% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON PARTNERSHIP: $8,570,000 over 6y, 55% of budgetIndianapolis Private Industry Council: $8,090,000 over 9y, 9.4% of budgetPROSPERITY NOW: $8,015,910 over 9y, 15% of budgetCoalition for Nonprofit Housing and: $7,960,000 over 7y, 39% of budgetTHE NASHVILLE CHAMBER PUBLIC BENEFIT FOUNDATION: $7,750,000 over 8y, 100% of budgetLINCOLN INSTITUTE OF LAND POLICY: $7,500,000 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetEDVESTORS INC: $7,500,000 over 6y, 79% of budgetSEATTLE FOUNDATION: $7,341,900 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetSOLAR & ENERGY LOAN FUND OF ST LUCIE COUNTY INC: $7,200,000 over 4y, 45% of budgetJOBS FOR THE FUTURE INC: $7,192,190 over 9y, 3.9% of budgetCAPITAL IMPACT PARTNERS: $6,925,100 over 7y, 5.9% of budgetMISSION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY: $6,830,600 over 7y, 22% of budgetTREC COMMUNITY INVESTORS: $6,643,066 over 8y, 54% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND: $6,517,720 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $6,458,351 over 9y, 11% of budgetNOLA BUSINESS ALLIANCE: $6,300,200 over 5y, 41% of budgetNEW PROFIT INC: $6,130,000 over 4y, 10% of budgetBeloved Community Inc: $5,950,000 over 5y, 60% of budgetCENTER FOR ECONOMIC INCLUSION: $5,900,300 over 5y, 32% of budgetCentral Valley Community Foundation A Corporation: $5,700,000 over 6y, 20% of budgetNATIONAL SKILLS COALITION: $5,575,000 over 8y, 27% of budgetPOLICYLINK: $5,500,000 over 7y, 6.0% of budgetCINNAIRE LENDING CORPORATION: $5,500,000 over 2y, 31% of budgetNATIONAL CAREER TECHNICAL EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $5,475,000 over 6y, 56% of budgetCRAFT3: $5,460,000 over 7y, 15% of budgetINVEST DETROIT FOUNDATION: $5,450,060 over 5y, 12% of budgetFLORIDA COMMUNITY LOAN FUND INC: $5,400,000 over 3y, 52% of budgetGENESIS LA ECONOMIC GROWTH CORPORATION: $5,325,000 over 5y, 35% of budgetSPANISH SPEAKING UNITY COUNCIL OF ALAMEDA COUNTY INC: $5,311,115 over 7y, 6.3% of budgetResearch Foundation of the City University of New York: $5,308,334 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetPIDC COMMUNITY CAPITAL: $5,300,000 over 5y, 29% of budgetCOMMUNITY SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,158,200 over 8y, 4.7% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $5,100,296 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMARTHA'S TABLE INC: $5,020,210 over 9y, 12% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA: $5,020,000 over 4y, 44% of budgetBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION: $5,001,248 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCleveland Development Advisors Community Reinvestment Fund Inc: $5,000,000 over 2y, 50% of budgetBUILDING BRIDGES ACROSS THE RIVER INC: $5,000,000 over 3y, 19% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL OF CHIEF STATE SCHOOL OFFICERS ↗
  • Who funds UNIDOSUS ↗
  • Who funds COMMIT2DALLAS ↗
  • Who funds GIVE2ASIA ↗
  • Who funds THE URBAN INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds The Resurrection Project ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR LATINO COMMUNITY ASSET BUILDERS ↗
  • Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds Indianapolis Private Industry Council ↗
  • Who funds PROSPERITY NOW ↗
  • Who funds Coalition for Nonprofit Housing and ↗
  • Who funds THE NASHVILLE CHAMBER PUBLIC BENEFIT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN INSTITUTE OF LAND POLICY ↗
  • Who funds EDVESTORS INC ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOLAR & ENERGY LOAN FUND OF ST LUCIE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds JOBS FOR THE FUTURE INC ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL IMPACT PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds MISSION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY ↗
  • Who funds TREC COMMUNITY INVESTORS ↗
  • Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds NOLA BUSINESS ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds NEW PROFIT INC ↗
  • Who funds Beloved Community Inc ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR ECONOMIC INCLUSION ↗
  • Who funds Central Valley Community Foundation A Corporation ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL SKILLS COALITION ↗
  • Who funds POLICYLINK ↗
  • Who funds CINNAIRE LENDING CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CAREER TECHNICAL EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

Siemer Family Foundat…Incyte Charitable Giv…Citi FoundationCapital One Foundatio…Harry C Moores Founda…L Brands FoundationLaffey-McHugh Foundat…Sunshine FoundationUnited Way of DelawareCrestlea Foundation I…Milton and Hattie Kut…Encova Foundation of …
Siemer Family FoundationOH34× affinity76 shared granteesties to 3 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Siemer Family Foundation · Incyte Charitable Giving Foundation · Citi Foundation · Capital One Foundation Inc · Harry C Moores Foundation · L Brands Foundation · Laffey-McHugh Foundation · Sunshine Foundation · United Way of Delaware · Crestlea Foundation Inc · Milton and Hattie Kutz Foundation · Encova Foundation of Ohio

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jpmorgan Chase Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jpmorgan Chase Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Solar & Energy Loan Fund of St Lucie County Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Youthbuild Global Inc: 69% of income from government
  • Education Development Center Inc: 65% of income from government
  • Worksystems Inc: 55% of income from government
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Florida Community Loan Fund Inc: 31% of income from government
  • United Way Miami Inc: 23% of income from government
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation: 23% of income from government
  • Enterprise Community Partners Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Parity Baltimore Incorporated: 11% of income from government
  • Jobs for the Future Inc: 11% of income from government
  • The Housing Partnership Network Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Rising Tide Capital Inc and Subsidiaries: 2% of income from government
  • Compass Working Capital Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Edvestors Inc: 1% of income from government
  • CRAFT3: 1% of income from government
  • Boston Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
49report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
4rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 2000 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jpmorgan Chase’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home