· Private foundation
John and Marcia Goldman Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k32 grants · $93k
- $10k–50k55 grants · $907k
- $50k–250k27 grants · $2.5M
- $250k+9 grants · $5.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDRENS HEALTH | $1,655,000 |
| EPACENTER | $1,400,000 |
| LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDRENS HEALTH | $502,000 |
| JOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS | $500,000 |
| CONGREGATION EMANU-EL | $250,000 |
| CONGREGATION EMANU-EL | $250,000 |
| AMALGAMATED CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC | $250,000 |
| JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SF MARIN PENINSULA & SONOMA COUNTIES | $250,000 |
| SAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY | $250,000 |
| ARTICLEGROUP ORG INC | $225,000 |
| IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER | $200,000 |
| FIND YOUR LIGHT FOUNDATION | $200,000 |
| JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SF MARIN PENINSULA & SONOMA COUNTIES | $156,000 |
| SAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY | $150,000 |
| BAY AREA CANCER CONNECTIONS | $100,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $270k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.
90 repeat relationships — 63 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 32 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.3M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LPLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH5× · 2020–2024 · $4.5M · revenue +8%
- EEPACENTER3× · 2022–2024 · $4.2M · revenue +28% · 70% of their budget
- JFJOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS2× · 2020–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +55%
Funded once
THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue +22%- PCPIVOTAL CONNECTIONSone grant, 2020 · $150k · revenue +3%
- FCFILOLI CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $150k · revenue +34%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…
Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…
For more than five decades, public advocates has challenged the systemic causes of poverty and racial discrimination by strengthening community voices in public policy and achieving tangible legal victories advancing education, housing,…
SF Partnership is an organization comprised of SF's leading employers dedicated to supporting an equitable, resilient, and vibrant economy shared by all people working and living in San Francisco. Through education, advocacy, and research,…
Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…
Enterprise for youth empowers under-resourced san francisco youths to reach their potential through transformative paid internship experiences supported by a community of employers, caring adults, and peers.
The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.
The bar association of san francisco champions equal access to justice and promotes humanity, excellence, and diversity in the legal profession. we provide legal services to disadvantaged and underserved individuals in san francisco. we…
PPS-SF's mission is to promote the fundamental value of public education and pursue the success of every public school by sharing knowledge, bridging communities, and informing policy.
Who we are - silicon valley education foundation (svef) focuses on raising student performance in the critical areas of math and science across all 33 santa clara county school districts, and also adjoining san mateo and alameda counties.…
The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.
A private school that cultivates and celebrates the intellectual, imaginative, and humanitarian promise of each student in a community that practices mutual respect, embraces diversity, and inspires passion for learning.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Center for Family Philanthropy Inc and the most unlike its peers is Glen Park Parent Teacher Organization. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
205 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 205 of the 240 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH ↗
- Who funds EPACENTER ↗
- Who funds JOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
- Who funds Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA ↗
- Who funds STANFORD HEALTH CARE ↗
- Who funds LUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds Golden State Opportunity ↗
- Who funds ILLUMINATE THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST ↗
- Who funds CHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RAVENSWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Silicon Valley Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CURIODYSSEY ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF SAN FRANCISCO MARIN & PENINSULA ↗
- Who funds IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds FIND YOUR LIGHT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MUTTVILLE ↗
- Who funds THEATREWORKS SILICON VALLEY ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds HOPE SERVICES ↗
- Who funds PIVOTAL CONNECTIONS ↗
- Who funds FILOLI CENTER ↗
- Who funds KQED INC ↗
- Who funds ALL MENTAL HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds Stern Grove Festival Association ↗
- Who funds Mercury Soul Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The San Francisco Foundation · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · Atkinson Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Sobrato Family Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · The Palo Alto Community Fund · Sand Hill Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · Los Altos Mountain View Community Foundation · Marin Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization John and Marcia Goldman Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Silk Road Project Inc — 4% of income from government
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to John and Marcia Goldman Foundation?
Find your warmest path to John and Marcia Goldman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.