· Private foundation
J J Keller Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k75 grants · $145k
- $10k–50k52 grants · $1.2M
- $50k–250k23 grants · $2.0M
- $250k+2 grants · $861k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BASIC NEEDS GIVING PARTNERSHIP | $600,550 |
| PILLARS | $260,780 |
| TRI-COUNTY COMMUNITY DENTAL CLINIC | $240,000 |
| FEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN | $173,500 |
| GREATER FOX CITIES AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $161,050 |
| CATALPA HEALTH INC | $161,000 |
| BIG BROTHERSBIG SISTERS OF EAST CENTRAL WI | $105,430 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OSHKOSH | $85,000 |
| FOX VALLEY LITERACY COALITION | $85,000 |
| DAY BY DAY WARMING SHELTER | $80,000 |
| COMMUNITY CLOTHES CLOSET INC | $78,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF FOX VALLEY | $75,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE BAY & LAKES REGION | $65,000 |
| OSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY PANTRY | $65,000 |
| SAMARITAN COUNSLING CENTER OF FOX VALLEY | $60,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 29% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
217 repeat relationships — 117 still active in FY2024, 100 since wound down; 30 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $162k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PIPILLARS INC8× · 2017–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +460%
- CHCATALPA HEALTH INC8× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +33%
- GFGREATER FOX CITIES AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC8× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +112%
Funded once
- CACHAPS ACADEMY INCone grant, 2017 · $96k
- BABAY AREA WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD INCone grant, 2021 · $70k · revenue +21%
- ARAMERICAN RED CROSS EAST CENTRAL WISCONSINone grant, 2021 · $60k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Goodwill of south central wisconsin's mission is to help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services. see schedule o for continuationsupported employment and job skills training are…
Legal protection and advocacy to protect the rights of people with disabilities in wisconsin.
Eliminating barriers to employment by providing pathways for those who are underserved, underrepresented and disadvantaged who have a goal of building skills that lead to sustained employment and improved financial stability.
We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.
To advance progressive values, ideas and policies through research, policy, networking, advocacy and public education.
Pathways of wisconsin provides supported employment opportunities and empowerment through quality, person-centered programming for individuals of all abilities.
Wisconsin family ties changes lives by improving children's mental health. it accomplishes this mission through a set of interrelated activities that support and educate parents, and inform practitioners, policy makers and the public about…
United way of wisconsin is dedicated to supporting and enriching a strong statewide united way network that maximizes the capacity of local united ways to address human needs, improve lives and create lasting positive change across…
Wwbic opens the doors of opportunity by providing any individuals who are interested in starting, strengthening, or expanding businesses with access to resources such as financial products and quality business and personal financial…
The mission of goodwill is to create opportunities for individuals with barriers to enhance their lives. barriers include physical or mental disabilities, lack of education and job preparation, socio-economic disadvantages, and others.…
The wisconsin council of the blind and visually impaired's mission is to promote the dignity and empowerment of people in wisconsin who are blind and visually impaired by providing services, advocating legislation, and educating the…
Goodwill manufacturing, inc. ("goodwill manufacturing") is a nonstock, not-for-profit wisconsin corporation, whose sole member is goodwill industries of southeastern wisconsin, inc. ("goodwill"), a wisconsin nonstock, not-for-profit…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Green Bay Preble Quarterback Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.3% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
299 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 299 of the 406 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE FOX VALLEY REGION INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER GREEN BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PILLARS INC ↗
- Who funds BASIC NEEDS GIVING PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds CATALPA HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER FOX CITIES AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds TRI-COUNTY COMMUNITY DENTAL CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds OSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds FEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER OF THE FOX VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds COTS INC ↗
- Who funds OSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF OSHKOSH INC ↗
- Who funds RAWHIDE INC ↗
- Who funds THE MOORING PROGRAMS INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds ST JOSEPH FOOD PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CLOTHES CLOSET ↗
- Who funds CAP SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds NAMI FOX VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds LEAVEN INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY FOX CITIES INC ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF EAST CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds RIVERVIEW GARDENS INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB FOX VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds HARBOR HOUSE DOMESTIC ABUSE PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds DAY BY DAY SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds WINNEBAGO AREA LITERACY COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTINE ANN DOMESTIC ABUSE SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER FOX VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds REACH COUNSELING SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CASA OF THE FOX CITIES INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ThedaCare Family of Foundations Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation for the Fox Valley Region Inc · US Ventureschmidt Family Foundation · Oshkosh Area Community Foundation Corporation · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · United Way Fox Cities Inc · The Clarence Wallace & Dolores Lynch Wallace Family Foundation · Theda and Tamblin Clark Smith Family Foundation Inc · Oshkosh Corporation Foundation Inc · Wisconsin Public Service Foundation · Basic Needs Giving Partnership Inc · The Boldt Family Fund Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization J J Keller Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Truckers Against Trafficking — 0% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to J J Keller Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to J J Keller Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.