· Private foundation
H Fort Flowers Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k89 grants · $194k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $244k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $66k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GEORGIA TECH | $66,000 |
| MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON | $25,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF FINDLAY | $23,000 |
| CHEYENNE ANIMAL SHELTER | $19,000 |
| DENVER RESCUE MISSION | $19,000 |
| SEVENTH CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST | $17,500 |
| WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER | $15,000 |
| NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY | $12,500 |
| ALS ASSOCIATION | $12,500 |
| FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES | $12,500 |
| L-CMD RESEARCH FOUNDATION | $12,500 |
| CURE CMD | $12,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $12,500 |
| BLACK DOG ANIMAL RESCUE | $10,500 |
| BLACK SWAMP AREA COUNCIL 449 BSA | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $117k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 17% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
132 repeat relationships — 82 still active in FY2025, 50 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TMTHE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON8× · 2018–2025 · $260k · revenue +54%
- VFVMI Foundation8× · 2018–2025 · $195k · revenue +11%
- BDBlack Dog Animal Rescue8× · 2018–2025 · $98k · revenue +19%
Funded once
GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $24k · revenue +103%- VIVALLEY INCLUSIVE PLAY SPACEone grant, 2024 · $10k
- ANALS Networkgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +29%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…
Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Findlay-Hancock County Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Buddies Place Cat Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
116 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 116 of the 202 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON ↗
- Who funds VMI Foundation ↗
- Who funds Black Dog Animal Rescue ↗
- Who funds CHEYENNE ANIMAL SHELTER ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds DENVER RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds L-CMD RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CURE CMD ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF HANCOCK COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds CIVIL AIR PATROL INC ↗
- Who funds The University of Findlay ↗
- Who funds UNACCOMPANIED STUDENTS INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds St Mary's University ↗
- Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
- Who funds River Oaks Chamber Orchestra ↗
- Who funds The Principia Corporation ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF CHEYENNE INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK ACADEMY OF ART ↗
- Who funds Trees For Houston ↗
- Who funds STAR OF HOPE MISSION ↗
- Who funds Houston Parks Board ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
- Who funds SAFEHOUSE SERVICES ↗
- Who funds NEEDS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.
Open a dossier: The Foster Family Private Foundation Inc · Wyoming Assn of Non Profit Organizations dba Wyoming Nonprofit Network · Shell USA Company Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Taco Johns Foundation · The Andrew Allen Charitable Foundation · The Findlay-Hancock County Community Foundation · Cheyenne Kiwanis Club Foundation · The Isabel Foundation · Joannides Family Foundation · The William Stamps Farish Fund · Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization H Fort Flowers Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
- University of Miami — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to H Fort Flowers Foundation?
Find your warmest path to H Fort Flowers Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.