Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Isabel Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$3.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
82
Grants FY2025still arriving
20
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Recreation & Sports$6.2MReligion$5.7MEducation$3.8MHealth$3.2MArts & Culture$2.0MHuman Services$1.4MHousing & Shelter$795kYouth Development$345kOther$0
02FY2025 · 82 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k46 grants · $1.0M
  • $50k–250k24 grants · $2.0M
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$25,000
Median grant
20
States reached
$88M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ADVENTURE UNLIMITED$250,000
FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST BOSTON THE$200,000
FLINT INSTITUTE OF ARTS$150,000
PRINCIPIA THE$150,000
LEAVES INC THE$125,000
CAMPERSHIP FUND FOR CHRISTIAN SCIENTISTS IN THE SE AND MW$100,000
HOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES$100,000
CRYSTAL LAKE CAMPS INC$100,000
FLINT INSTITUTE OF ARTS$85,000
CEDARS CAMPS THE$75,000
FLINT INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND HISTORY$75,000
CAMPS NEWFOUNDOWATONNA CORPORATION$75,000
CAMPS LEELANAU & KOHAHNA FOUNDATION INC$75,000
CRYSTAL LAKE CAMPS INC$75,000
ARDEN WOOD INC$60,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 9% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RAINBOW VALLEY RESOURCE NETWORK: $20k → 11%CHESTNUT HILL BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION: $75k → 7%TWELVEACRES INC: $60k → 8%CHERISHABILITY: $20k → 12%CHESTNUT HILL BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION: $75k → 7%TWELVEACRES INC: $60k → 8%CHERISHABILITY: $20k → 12%CHESTNUT HILL BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION: $70k → 7%TWELVEACRES INC: $60k → 8%CHESTNUT HILL BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION: $70k → 7%TWELVEACRES INC: $55k → 8%CHESTNUT HILL BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION: $65k → 7%TWELVEACRES INC: $50k → 8%NORTHMEN DEN YOUTH PANTRIES INC: $6k → 9%CHESTNUT HILL BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION: $60k → 7%TWELVEACRES INC: $50k → 8%NORTHMEN DEN YOUTH PANTRIES INC: $5k → 9%CHESTNUT HILL BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION: $60k → 7%TWELVEACRES INC: $50k → 8%CHESTNUT HILL BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION: $60k → 7%TWELVEACRES INC: $50k → 8%CHESTNUT HILL BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION: $60k → 7%TWELVEACRES INC: $45k → 8%CHESTNUT HILL BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION: $25k → 7%RAINBOW VALLEY RESOURCE NETWORK: $15k → 10%RAINBOW VALLEY RESOURCE NETWORK: $15k → 10%RAINBOW VALLEY RESOURCE NETWORK: $15k → 10%NORTHMEN DEN YOUTH PANTRIES INC: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
NH
WA
MN
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
VA
AZ
KS
TN
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$24M · 76 repeat orgs$497k to everyone else

76 repeat relationships — 56 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

76
20

Total granted

$24M
$362k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+26%

Still filing today

75%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $136k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationArts & CultureReligionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AU
    ADVENTURE UNLIMITED
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.5M · revenue +122%
  • TP
    The Principia Corporation
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.6M · revenue +88%
  • TC
    The Cedars Camps Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $678k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • GT
    GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCYgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $120k · revenue +203%
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR UPTOWN REINVESTMENTgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue +559%
  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR FIELD RESEARCH
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Science Nursing Care Endowment

Providing financial support to non-profit care facilities for nursing/care.

Human Services
2
The Christ College of Nursing & Health Sciences

The christ college of nursing and health sciences, guided by its core values and enriched by a foundation in the arts and sciences, prepares individuals both for delivery of healthcare that promotes the well-being of a dynamic society and…

Education
3
National Church Residences At Home Health and Wellness Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
4
National Church Residences At Home Hospice

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
5
National Church Residences At Home Hospice Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
6
National Church Residences At Home Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

—
7
National Church Residences Chillicothe Land Holdings Inc

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
8
Christian Healthcare Specialists

Christian Healthcare Specialists exists to provide exceptional medical services to the community, guided by Biblical values.

Health
9
Clifton House Inc

To support proper care and an atmosphere expectant of healing through Christian Science nursing.

—
10
Christian Health Care Center

Christian Health Care Center is a skilled nursing facility which provides housing services designed to meet the needs of older residents of Lynden Washington regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
11
Ncr At Home Health and Wellness

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
12
Michigan Christian Home

The michigan christian home dba beacon hill at eastgate, a not-for-profit corporation, provides housing and health services in a christian environment for older adults, thus enabling them to meet their ongoing physical, social and…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sunrise Haven and the most unlike its peers is Hymnstream. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLocal History MuseumsEnvironmental Conservation …Christian Missionary Organi…Youth Development CentersCommunity FoundationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Policy Research and AdvocacyCancer Support ServicesCommunity College Foundatio…Community FoundationsIndependent K-12 SchoolsChristian Youth CampsCommunity Arts CentersSenior Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%10%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%9%20–35yr13%30%35–55yr16%38%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%6%10–20yr16%6%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr16%61%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/75
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,490

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

71 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 71 of the 102 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
70/71
Grantees still filing
41/71
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST BOSTON THE — $1,450,000 · OtherFIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST BOSTON THEFIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST FLINT THE — $885,000 · OtherFIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST FLINT THEThe Cedars Camps Inc — $677,801 · OtherThe Cedars Camps IncCAMP LEELANAU AND KOHAHNA FOUNDATION INC — $620,000 · OtherCAMP LEELANAU AND KOHAHNA FOUNDATION INCCAMPERSHIP FUND FOR CHRISTIAN SCIENTISTS IN THE SE AND MW — $385,000 · OtherTRAVERSE AREA RECREATION & TRANSPORTATION TRAILS INC — $335,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF CAMP BOW-ISLE — $351,407 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER FLINT — $345,000 · OtherFern Lodge Inc — $455,000 · Other+51 more — $4,423,634 · Other+51 moreADVENTURE UNLIMITED — $2,490,390 · Recreation & SportsADVENTURE UNLIMIT…CRYSTAL LAKE CAMPS INC — $676,757 · Recreation & SportsCRYSTAL LAKE CAMP…Camp Newfound Owatonna Corporation — $625,606 · Recreation & SportsCamp Newfound Owa…ARDEN WOOD INC — $670,000 · HealthARDEN WOOD INCBroadview Inc — $570,000 · HealthBroadview IncWIDE HORIZON INC — $515,000 · HealthWIDE HORIZON INCGLENMONT — $450,000 · HealthGLENMONTDAYSTAR INC — $315,000 · HealthDAYSTAR INCSUNLAND HOME FOUNDATION — $270,000 · HealthSUNLAND HOME FOUN…THE PRINCIPLE FOUNDATION EXTENDED SERVICES — $240,000 · HealthTHE PRINCIPLE FOU…CLEARVIEW HOME CORPORATION — $175,000 · HealthSUNRISE HAVEN — $170,000 · Health+5 more — $309,500 · Health+5 moreThe Principia Corporation — $1,610,000 · EducationThe Princi…The Link School — $260,000 · EducationThe Link S…THE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE — $175,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTE…HOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES — $100,000 · Education+6 more — $109,859 · EducationFlint Institute of Arts — $946,000 · Arts & CultureFlint Cultural Center Corporation — $650,000 · Arts & CultureLONGYEAR FOUNDATION — $110,000 · Arts & Culture+3 more — $87,907 · Arts & CultureThe Leaves Inc — $574,851 · ReligionPEACE HAVEN ASSOCIATION INC — $540,000 · ReligionE3 ELEVATING EDUCATION EVERYWHERE INC — $410,000 · ReligionChristian Science Provider Network — $85,000 · Religion+1 more — $10,000 · ReligionChestnut Hill Benevolent Association — $620,000 · Human ServicesTWELVEACRES INC — $480,000 · Human ServicesCHERISHABILITY — $105,000 · Human Services+1 more — $13,000 · Human Services
Other$9,927,842Recreation & Sports$3,792,753Health$3,684,500Education$2,254,859Arts & Culture$1,793,907Religion$1,619,851Human Services$1,218,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetADVENTURE UNLIMITED — $2,490,390 over 9y, 7.2% of budgetThe Principia Corporation — $1,610,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetFlint Institute of Arts — $946,000 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetThe Cedars Camps Inc — $677,801 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetCRYSTAL LAKE CAMPS INC — $676,757 over 9y, 16% of budgetARDEN WOOD INC — $670,000 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetFlint Cultural Center Corporation — $650,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetCamp Newfound Owatonna Corporation — $625,606 over 9y, 5.1% of budgetChestnut Hill Benevolent Association — $620,000 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetCAMP LEELANAU AND KOHAHNA FOUNDATION INC — $620,000 over 9y, 3.9% of budgetThe Leaves Inc — $574,851 over 9y, 3.2% of budgetBroadview Inc — $570,000 over 9y, 3.3% of budgetPEACE HAVEN ASSOCIATION INC — $540,000 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetWIDE HORIZON INC — $515,000 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetTWELVEACRES INC — $480,000 over 9y, 4.4% of budgetFern Lodge Inc — $455,000 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetGLENMONT — $450,000 over 9y, 2.8% of budgetE3 ELEVATING EDUCATION EVERYWHERE INC — $410,000 over 9y, 30% of budgetFRIENDS OF CAMP BOW-ISLE — $351,407 over 9y, 39% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER FLINT — $345,000 over 9y, 3.2% of budgetTRAVERSE AREA RECREATION & TRANSPORTATION TRAILS INC — $335,000 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetDAYSTAR INC — $315,000 over 9y, 2.7% of budgetLynn House of Potomac Valley Inc — $315,000 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetSUNLAND HOME FOUNDATION — $270,000 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetThe Link School — $260,000 over 9y, 5.3% of budgetTHE ALBERT BAKER FUND — $247,000 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetSUNRISE OF AFRICA SCHOOL CHARITABLE FDN INC — $240,000 over 9y, 29% of budgetTHE PRINCIPLE FOUNDATION EXTENDED SERVICES — $240,000 over 6y, 6.7% of budgetFlint Institute of Science & History — $225,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetTHE PRINCIPLE FOUNDATION — $183,034 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE — $175,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCLEARVIEW HOME CORPORATION — $175,000 over 9y, 4.0% of budgetSUNRISE HAVEN — $170,000 over 9y, 2.2% of budgetTHE OLIVE GLEN FOUNDATION INC — $165,000 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetGRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY — $120,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetThe Branch School Inc — $120,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetLONGYEAR FOUNDATION — $110,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetNOONTIDE VISITING CHRISTIAN SCIENCE NURS NURSE SERVICE OF MICHIGAN — $106,000 over 8y, 26% of budgetCHERISHABILITY — $105,000 over 6y, 5.5% of budgetCHRISTIAN SCIENCE NURSING NETWORK INC — $102,000 over 7y, 86% of budgetHOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR UPTOWN REINVESTMENT — $100,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetChristian Science Provider Network — $85,000 over 9y, 6.4% of budgetCOUNCIL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATIONS — $82,200 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetMorning Light Foundation Inc — $73,500 over 9y, 3.3% of budgetOVERLOOK HOUSE — $72,000 over 7y, 4.2% of budgetNEW TEACHER CENTER — $45,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetClairbourn School Inc — $45,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ADVENTURE UNLIMITED ↗
  • Who funds The Principia Corporation ↗
  • Who funds Flint Institute of Arts ↗
  • Who funds The Cedars Camps Inc ↗
  • Who funds CRYSTAL LAKE CAMPS INC ↗
  • Who funds ARDEN WOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds Flint Cultural Center Corporation ↗
  • Who funds Camp Newfound Owatonna Corporation ↗
  • Who funds Chestnut Hill Benevolent Association ↗
  • Who funds CAMP LEELANAU AND KOHAHNA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Leaves Inc ↗
  • Who funds Broadview Inc ↗
  • Who funds PEACE HAVEN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WIDE HORIZON INC ↗
  • Who funds TWELVEACRES INC ↗
  • Who funds Fern Lodge Inc ↗
  • Who funds GLENMONT ↗
  • Who funds E3 ELEVATING EDUCATION EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF CAMP BOW-ISLE ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER FLINT ↗
  • Who funds TRAVERSE AREA RECREATION & TRANSPORTATION TRAILS INC ↗
  • Who funds DAYSTAR INC ↗
  • Who funds Lynn House of Potomac Valley Inc ↗
  • Who funds SUNLAND HOME FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Link School ↗
  • Who funds THE ALBERT BAKER FUND ↗
  • Who funds SUNRISE OF AFRICA SCHOOL CHARITABLE FDN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PRINCIPLE FOUNDATION EXTENDED SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds Flint Institute of Science & History ↗
  • Who funds THE PRINCIPLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tenacre FoundationMueller Hoisel Wanger…Charles Stewart Mott …Powell Crown Foundati…Towle Family Foundati…Asher Student Foundat…The Daycroft School F…The Membery FoundationThe Borch FoundationThe Tiny Tiger Founda…The Harding Foundatio…Greater Milwaukee Fou…
Tenacre FoundationNJ81.9× affinity37 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tenacre Foundation · Mueller Hoisel Wanger Charitable Foundation Inc · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · Powell Crown Foundation · Towle Family Foundation · Asher Student Foundation · The Daycroft School Foundation Inc · The Membery Foundation · The Borch Foundation · The Tiny Tiger Foundation · The Harding Foundation 2108-01-44 · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Isabel Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • The Trustees of the Smith College — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Isabel Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Isabel Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 102 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines