· Private foundation
Goldring Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k176 grants · $742k
- $10k–50k91 grants · $1.5M
- $50k–250k34 grants · $2.8M
- $250k+4 grants · $1.9M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HENRY S JACOBS CAMP | $1,000,000 |
| HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION | $400,000 |
| NATIONAL WWII MUSEUM | $250,000 |
| XAVIER UNIVERSITY | $250,000 |
| YUD FOUNDATION | $200,000 |
| YOUTH EMPOWERMENT PROJECT | $200,000 |
| LOUISE H MOFFETT FAMILY FOUNDATION | $176,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $132,320 |
| OPERATION RESTORATION | $125,000 |
| HEALTH ALLIANCE LOUISIANA | $100,000 |
| BOYS TOWN OF LOUISIANA | $100,000 |
| KIPP NEW ORLEANS | $100,000 |
| CITY YEAR | $100,000 |
| PARKS ALLIANCE OF LOUISVILLE | $100,000 |
| SON OF A SAINT | $100,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $3.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
320 repeat relationships — 164 still active in FY2024, 156 since wound down; 118 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.6M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TATHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND7× · 2017–2024 · $3.5M · revenue +72%
- CHCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL INC4× · 2019–2022 · $1.0M · revenue +84%
- FOFRIENDS OF IR DAVID INC2× · 2022–2023 · $1.0M · revenue +19%
Funded once
- TATHE AVALON FUNDone grant, 2020 · $500k
- JAJEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAELone grant, 2023 · $500k
- ANAudubon Nature Institute Incgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $450k · revenue +37%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The lsu foundation cultivates and invests in philanthropic partnerships to support and advance lsu's academic priorities.
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
The University of New Orleans Foundation's mission is to promote the well-being and advancement of the University of New Orleans and all the colleges, schools, departments, and divisions comprising it, and to develop, expand, and improve…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…
The mission of the foundation is to inspire donors to invest in the lsu health sciences center - new orleans ("hsc-no") and its future, to properly steward those contributions, and to help meet the ever evolving needs of the lsuhsc-no by…
Provide undergraduate and graduate education in a variety of programs to approximately 600 undergraduate and 100 graduate students.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
We are chicago's jesuit, catholic university - a diverse community seeking god in all things and working to expand knowledge in the service of humanity through learning, justice, and faith.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Schools for New Orleans Inc and the most unlike its peers is Poydras Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
263 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 263 of the 836 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
- Who funds HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF IR DAVID INC ↗
- Who funds NEW ORLEANS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NEW ORLEANS ↗
- Who funds LOUISE H MOFFETT FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds XAVIER UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA ↗
- Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
- Who funds JEWISH CHILDREN'S REGIONAL SERVICE ↗
- Who funds Audubon Nature Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds JEWISH ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAVE A CHILD'S HEART FOUNDATION US INC ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE NEW ORLEANS ↗
- Who funds SON OF A SAINT ↗
- Who funds NEW SCHOOLS FOR NEW ORLEANS INC ↗
- Who funds BOULDER CREST FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BRIDGE HOUSE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
- Who funds CITY YEAR INC ↗
- Who funds DISCOVERY HEALTH SCIENCES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Boys Town Louisiana Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
- Who funds ISIDORE NEWMAN SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds KIPP OF NEW ORLEANS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Baptist Community Ministries · The Greater New Orleans Foundation · Woldenberg Foundation · The Usdin-Weil Foundation · Louise H Moffett Family Foundation · Eugenie & Joseph Jones Family Foundation · United Way of Southeast Louisiana · Keller Family Foundation · The Helis Foundation · Patrick F Taylor Foundation · The Almar Foundationdba The Alden and Margaret Laborde Foundation · The Gpoa Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Goldring Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
- The University of Tampa Incorporated — 0% of income from government
- Emerson College — 0% of income from government
- Mcdonogh School Incorporated — 0% of income from government
- St Thomas University Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Goldring Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Goldring Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.