Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

GEORGE H SANDY FOUNDATION co US BANKNA

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$4.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
79
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$205k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 51% of GEORGE H SANDY FOUNDATION co US BANKNA’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 79 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k42 grants · $1.2M
  • $50k–250k35 grants · $3.3M
$40,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$58M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley$205,000
RAPHAEL HOUSE$185,000
ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$185,000
EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SF$165,000
LA CAS DE LAS MADRES$160,000
HOMELESS PRENATAL PROGRAM$155,000
Safe Sound$150,000
SAN FRANCISCO AND MARIN FOOD BANK$140,000
FOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY$130,000
Advokids$125,000
Individual grant recipient$110,000
Reading Partners$100,000
Swords to Ploughshares Vet Rights O$100,000
Huckleberry Youth Programs$85,000
Larkin Street Youth Services$80,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $5.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%City Youth Now: $100k → 10%City Youth Now: $100k → 10%City Youth Now: $90k → 10%City Youth Now: $80k → 10%City Youth Now: $80k → 10%City Youth Now: $65k → 10%City Youth Now: $65k → 10%City Youth Now: $65k → 10%Huckleberry Youth Programs: $85k → 10%Huckleberry Youth Programs: $85k → 10%Huckleberry Youth Programs: $75k → 10%Huckleberry Youth Programs: $75k → 10%Huckleberry Youth Programs: $75k → 10%Huckleberry Youth Programs: $65k → 10%Huckleberry Youth Programs: $60k → 10%Northern California Family Center: $50k → 9%Northern California Family Center: $50k → 9%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SF: $165k → 10%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SF: $160k → 10%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SF: $150k → 10%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SF: $150k → 10%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SF: $90k → 10%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SF: $90k → 10%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SF: $90k → 10%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SF: $80k → 10%Larkin Street Youth Services: $105k → 10%Larkin Street Youth Services: $105k → 10%Larkin Street Youth Services: $105k → 10%Larkin Street Youth Services: $105k → 10%Larkin Street Youth Services: $100k → 10%Larkin Street Youth Services: $80k → 10%Larkin Street Youth Services: $75k → 10%Larkin Street Youth Services: $75k → 10%CURRY SENIOR CENTER: $60k → 10%CURRY SENIOR CENTER: $60k → 10%CURRY SENIOR CENTER: $60k → 10%CURRY SENIOR CENTER: $60k → 10%CURRY SENIOR CENTER: $60k → 10%CURRY SENIOR CENTER: $60k → 10%CURRY SENIOR CENTER: $60k → 10%RAPHAEL HOUSE: $190k → 10%RAPHAEL HOUSE: $185k → 10%RAPHAEL HOUSE: $170k → 10%RAPHAEL HOUSE: $170k → 10%RAPHAEL HOUSE: $110k → 10%RAPHAEL HOUSE: $110k → 10%RAPHAEL HOUSE: $110k → 10%RAPHAEL HOUSE: $100k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of GEORGE H SANDY FOUNDATION co US BANKNA’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

GEORGE H SANDY FOUNDATION co US BANKNAlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.9% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$31M · 103 repeat orgs$238k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +82% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.

103 repeat relationships — 76 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

103
13

Total granted

$31M
$143k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+82%
+28%

Still filing today

60%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $95k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RH
    RAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +50%
  • La Casa de las Madres
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +75%
  • Homeless Prenatal Program Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +153%

Funded once

  • TN
    The Novato Human Needs Center
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • EF
    Enterprise for High School
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • AF
    Alive Free formerly Omega Boys Club
    one grant, 2017 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
2
Homeward Bound of Marin

Homeward Bound is the main provider of emergency shelter, supportive housing and services for people overcoming a crisis of homelessness in Marin County, California. Our mission of "opening doors to safety, dignity, hope, and…

Housing & Shelter
3
Children's Council of San Francisco

By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…

Human Services
4
Community Action Marin

We make it possible for people in marin to achieve well-being by providing the vital services they need. together, we break down the barriers that get in the way of fair and lasting change in service to better outcomes for all.

Human Services
5
East Bay Agency for Children

For more than 70 years, East Bay Agency for Children continues to improve the well-being of children, youth and families by reducing the impact of trauma and social inequalities.

Health
6
Homeless Childrens Network

To provide direct mental health services, psychotherapy, and counseling to homeless families in San Francisco, CA and in particular to children of such families, to provide referral services for such families and their children to other…

Human Services
7
Sacramento Children's Home

At the sacramento children's home, we are committed to opening doors to the future by maximizing the potential of children and families.

Human Services
8
Edgewood Center for Children and Families

To be the place to begin for all bay area children, youth and families who need mental health, social services and academic support. edgewood is the premier provider of a full continuum of behavioral health services that transform the…

Health
9
Allies for Every Child Inc

All children need a childhood. Allies for Every Child brings together and strengthens families, cultivating conditions for children to succeed in life. (Continues on Schedule O)

Human Services
10
Bay Area Community Services Housing Corp

Improve the quality of life for individuals in Alameda County, Contra Costa County, Solano County, Monterey County, Sacramento County and the surrounding area in the State of California.

Housing & Shelter
11
Center for Community Solutions

The mission is to end relationship and sexual violence by being a catalyst for caring communities and social justice. the vision is for all people to live full, free, expressive, and empowered lives in a safe, healthy, vibrant, and…

Health
12
Wellnest Emotional Health & Wellness

Through a holistic approach to emotional well-being, Wellnest offers hope, healing, and opportunity to the children, young adults, families, and communities we serve. Our commitment remains steadfast as we enter our second century of…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Compass Family Services and the most unlike its peers is The Zones. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 49 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%3%10–20yr17%23%20–35yr14%42%35–55yr12%32%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%3%10–20yr17%31%20–35yr14%49%35–55yr12%18%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/73
the rest of the field
11%
3,804/33,386

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

69 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 69 of the 119 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
21
Early backer (in before they grew)
67/69
Grantees still filing
62/69
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

La Casa de las Madres — $1,125,000 · OtherLa Casa de las MadresSafe Sound — $1,040,000 · OtherSafe SoundSAN FRANCISCO AND MARIN FOOD BANK — $875,000 · OtherADVOKIDS — $860,000 · OtherALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $780,000 · OtherST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY — $740,000 · OtherPOMEROY REC REHABILITATION CNTR — $680,000 · Other+66 more — $10,725,000 · Other+66 moreRAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO INC — $1,145,000 · Human ServicesRAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN …EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SAN FRANCISCO — $975,000 · Human ServicesEPISCOPAL COMMUNITY S…Larkin Street Youth Services — $750,000 · Human ServicesLarkin Street Youth S…CITY YOUTH NOW FKA VOLUNTEER AUXILIARY YOUTH GUIDANCE CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO — $645,000 · Human ServicesCITY YOUTH NOW FKA VO…HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC — $560,000 · Human ServicesHUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PRO…CURRY SENIOR CENTER — $470,000 · Human ServicesCURRY SENIOR CENTERNORTHERN CALIFORNIA FAMILY CENTER — $355,000 · Human ServicesNORTHERN CALIFORNIA F…HOLY FAMILY DAY HOME — $285,000 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SONOMA COUNTY — $235,000 · Human ServicesRITTER CENTER — $205,000 · Human Services+6 more — $350,000 · Human Services+6 moreREADING PARTNERS — $850,000 · EducationREADING P…FOUNDATION FOR HEARING RESEARCH INC WEINGARTEN CHILDRENS CENTER — $315,000 · EducationFOUNDATIO…Center for Early Intervention on Deafness — $270,000 · EducationCenter fo…10000 DEGREES — $210,000 · Education10000 DEG…San Francisco Achievers — $210,000 · EducationSan Franc…San Francisco Education Fund — $190,000 · EducationSan Franc…EASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC — $185,000 · EducationEASTSIDE …South of Market Child Care Inc — $180,000 · EducationSouth of …STERNE SCHOOL — $110,000 · Education+2 more — $122,500 · EducationHomeless Prenatal Program Inc — $1,020,000 · HealthAmbulatory Surgery Access Coalition — $275,000 · HealthADOLESCENT COUNSELING SERVICES — $260,000 · HealthACKNOWLEDGE ALLIANCE — $230,000 · HealthBUCKELEW PROGRAMS — $165,000 · HealthAccess Institute for Psychological Services — $150,000 · HealthIN SPIRIT — $80,000 · Health+1 more — $75,000 · HealthSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY — $805,000 · Food & NutritionREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK — $530,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO — $465,000 · Food & NutritionProject Open Hand — $205,000 · Food & NutritionSan Francisco CASA — $480,000 · Civil RightsCourt Appointed Special Advocates — $295,000 · Civil RightsHAMILTON FAMILIES — $285,000 · Housing & ShelterNEW DOOR VENTURES FKA GOLDEN GATE COMMUNITY INC — $225,000 · Housing & ShelterWEST VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC — $145,000 · Housing & ShelterRUBY'S PLACE INC — $65,000 · Housing & ShelterOPERATION DIGNITY INC — $55,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$16,825,000Human Services$5,975,000Education$2,642,500Health$2,255,000Food & Nutrition$2,005,000Civil Rights$775,000Housing & Shelter$775,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO INC — $1,145,000 over 8y, 6.0% of budgetLa Casa de las Madres — $1,125,000 over 8y, 4.0% of budgetHomeless Prenatal Program Inc — $1,020,000 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetEPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SAN FRANCISCO — $975,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetADVOKIDS — $860,000 over 8y, 18% of budgetREADING PARTNERS — $850,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY — $805,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $780,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLarkin Street Youth Services — $750,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetCITY YOUTH NOW FKA VOLUNTEER AUXILIARY YOUTH GUIDANCE CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO — $645,000 over 8y, 43% of budgetHUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC — $560,000 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK — $530,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSan Francisco CASA — $480,000 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetCURRY SENIOR CENTER — $470,000 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetSTANBRIDGE ACADEMY — $470,000 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO — $465,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHARLES ARMSTRONG SCHOOL — $440,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetOakes Children's Center — $420,000 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetNORTHERN CALIFORNIA FAMILY CENTER — $355,000 over 8y, 6.5% of budgetSAMARITAN HOUSE — $340,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR HEARING RESEARCH INC WEINGARTEN CHILDRENS CENTER — $315,000 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetCourt Appointed Special Advocates — $295,000 over 8y, 8.1% of budgetHAMILTON FAMILIES — $285,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetHOLY FAMILY DAY HOME — $285,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetCASA of San Mateo County — $280,000 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetAmbulatory Surgery Access Coalition — $275,000 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetNorth Marin Community Services — $275,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetCenter for Early Intervention on Deafness — $270,000 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetCOMMITTEE ON THE SHELTERLESS — $270,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetADOLESCENT COUNSELING SERVICES — $260,000 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetTHE YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SONOMA COUNTY — $235,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetACKNOWLEDGE ALLIANCE — $230,000 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetRUBICON PROGRAMS INC — $225,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetNEW DOOR VENTURES FKA GOLDEN GATE COMMUNITY INC — $225,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budget10000 DEGREES — $210,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetSan Francisco Achievers — $210,000 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetProject Open Hand — $205,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetRITTER CENTER — $205,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCentral City Hospitality House — $200,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetSan Francisco Education Fund — $190,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetEASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC — $185,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetSouth of Market Child Care Inc — $180,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetBUCKELEW PROGRAMS — $165,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetAccess Institute for Psychological Services — $150,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetENTERPRISE FOR YOUTH — $150,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetWEST VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC — $145,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetArriba Juntos — $145,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetMarin Brain Injury Network Schurig Center for Brain Injury Recovery — $115,000 over 4y, 4.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO INC ↗
  • Who funds La Casa de las Madres ↗
  • Who funds Homeless Prenatal Program Inc ↗
  • Who funds EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
  • Who funds ADVOKIDS ↗
  • Who funds READING PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Larkin Street Youth Services ↗
  • Who funds CITY YOUTH NOW FKA VOLUNTEER AUXILIARY YOUTH GUIDANCE CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
  • Who funds HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds San Francisco CASA ↗
  • Who funds CURRY SENIOR CENTER ↗
  • Who funds STANBRIDGE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO ↗
  • Who funds THE CHARLES ARMSTRONG SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Oakes Children's Center ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN CALIFORNIA FAMILY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR HEARING RESEARCH INC WEINGARTEN CHILDRENS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Court Appointed Special Advocates ↗
  • Who funds HAMILTON FAMILIES ↗
  • Who funds HOLY FAMILY DAY HOME ↗
  • Who funds CASA of San Mateo County ↗
  • Who funds Ambulatory Surgery Access Coalition ↗
  • Who funds North Marin Community Services ↗
  • Who funds Center for Early Intervention on Deafness ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bothin FoundationMcNabb FoundationKaiser Foundation Hos…Marin Community Found…The San Francisco Fou…The William G Irwin C…Sutter Bay HospitalsSilicon Valley Commun…Tipping Point Communi…Jewish Community Fede…United Way of the Bay…The William G Gilmore…
Bothin FoundationCA50.2× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bothin Foundation · McNabb Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Marin Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · The William G Irwin Charity Foundation · Sutter Bay Hospitals · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Tipping Point Community · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · United Way of the Bay Area · The William G Gilmore Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization GEORGE H SANDY FOUNDATION co US BANKNA funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    37report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 119 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines