· Private foundation
George and Sarah Buchanan Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k10 grants · $50k
- $10k–50k41 grants · $990k
- $50k–250k31 grants · $2.6M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT | $150,000 |
| TUNNELS TO TOWERS FOUNDATION | $150,000 |
| GARY SINESE FOUNDATION | $150,000 |
| CALDWELL ACADEMY | $150,000 |
| JDRF | $150,000 |
| SAMARITAN'S PURSE | $125,000 |
| DANVILLE LIFE SAVINGS AND FIRST AID CREW | $100,000 |
| KIDS AND PROS | $100,000 |
| HOPE ACADEMY | $100,000 |
| PRE-BORN | $100,000 |
| MOUNT JUBILEE MINISTRIES | $85,000 |
| GUY FIERI FOUNDATION | $75,000 |
| SPECIAL OLYMPICS | $75,000 |
| OPERATING COMING HOME FOUNDATION INC | $75,000 |
| CEREBRAL PALSY ALLIANCE RESEARCH FOUNDATION | $75,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $490k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +13% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
78 repeat relationships — 66 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $120k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CACALDWELL ACADEMY6× · 2017–2025 · $436k · revenue +28%
- DLDANVILLE LIFE SAVING AND FIRST AID CREW INC4× · 2022–2025 · $355k · revenue +93%
STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION4× · 2022–2025 · $349k · revenue +83%
Funded once
- CHCOMING HOME FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -21%
- FOFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue +3%
- YFYOUTH FOCUS INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +80%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.
To serve the crisis management, information and referral needs of america's veterans and their families.
Research and advocacy for veterans with post-traumatic stress and the prevention of veteran suicide.
Our organization's mission is to raise awareness for and provide physical aid and support to disabled us military veterans. our program covers a crucial gap in the industry-a veteran operated organization, that can assist veterans with…
Amvets is a veterans service organization whose members, having served or now serving in the u.s. armed forces, are united to uphold and defend the constitution of the united states; to safeguard the principles of freedom, liberty and…
The special forces foundation provides immediate and ongoing support to the special forces community and their families.
Pets for Vets enriches the lives of veterans by creating a life-changing Super Bond with expertly selected and trained shelter or rescue pets. It provides ongoing expert support to ensure a reciprocal and thriving partnership at no cost to…
Healing paws for warriors is a local veteran found / veteran led 501(c)(3) that provides rescue to trained service dogs to veterans faced with post traumatic stress disorder (ptsd), traumatic brain injury (tbi) and/or military sexual…
To champion public awareness of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and challenges confronting our countrys heroes and rally support for shelter animal adoption by connecting heroes and companions.
To develop, operate, and support a synergistic group of wellness, quality of life, and event-based initiatives in support of today's combat-wounded military personnel and their families, while facilitating a greater recognition and…
Soldiers' angels provides aid, comfort, and resources to the military, veterans, and their families.
To send care and comfort packages to deployed american military heroes who are stationed in active duty theaters around the world, as well as to facilitate activities that elevate morale of all veterans
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Special Operations Warrior Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
81 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 81 of the 108 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CALDWELL ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds DANVILLE LIFE SAVING AND FIRST AID CREW INC ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MDRC ↗
- Who funds AVERETT UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds KIDS & PROS INC ↗
- Who funds OPERATION COMING HOME FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Mount Jubilee Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds Mission Pre-Born Inc ↗
- Who funds ROBERT IRVINE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Cerebral Palsy Alliance Research Foundation ↗
- Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
- Who funds HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC ↗
- Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds THE GUY FIERI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Danville Church and Community Tutorial Program ↗
- Who funds Hope For The Warriors ↗
- Who funds DANVILLE PITTSYLVANIA CANCER ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds OPERATION HOMEFRONT INC ↗
- Who funds Operation Second Chance Inc ↗
- Who funds National Law Enforcement and Firefighters Childrens Foundation ↗
- Who funds Children of Fallen Patriots Foundation ↗
- Who funds HANNAH'S HAVEN INC ↗
- Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
- Who funds SENIOR RESOURCES OF GUILFORD ↗
- Who funds FELLOWSHIP HALL INC ↗
- Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
- Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Greensboro Inc · Alexander Berkeley Carrington Jr & Ruth Simpson Carrington Charitable Trust · The Community Foundation of the Dan River Region · The Stout Family Foundation · Jt-Minnie Maude Charitable Trust · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Tannenbaum-Sternberger Foundation Inc · Reynolds American Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · Betty J and Robert P Williams Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization George and Sarah Buchanan Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
- K9S for Warriors Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.