· Private foundation
Tannenbaum-Sternberger Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k19 grants · $107k
- $10k–50k44 grants · $615k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $150k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YWCA OF GREENSBORO | $50,000 |
| KELLIN FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| NUSSBAUM CENTER FOR ENTREPRENEURSHIP | $50,000 |
| THE FORGE | $36,000 |
| GREENSBORO URBAN MINISTRY | $30,000 |
| DOWNTOWN GREENSBORO FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NC | $25,000 |
| YMCA OF GREENSBORO | $25,000 |
| FAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT | $25,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC | $20,000 |
| CHILDREN'S LAW CENTER OF CENTRAL NC | $20,000 |
| READING CONNECTIONS | $20,000 |
| CHILDREN AND FAMILIES FIRST | $20,000 |
| CHURCH WORLD SERVICE GREENSBORO | $15,000 |
| RECONSIDERED GOODS | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $768k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
66 repeat relationships — 38 still active in FY2025, 28 since wound down; 27 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $380k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GUGREENSBORO URBAN MINISTRY6× · 2020–2025 · $180k · revenue +6%
- RCREADING CONNECTIONS INC5× · 2021–2025 · $111k · revenue +23%
- TNTHE NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER OF GREENSBORO INC DBA GREENSBORO SCIENCE CENTER2× · 2020–2021 · $100k · revenue +167%
Funded once
- UWUNC-G WEATHERSPOON ART MUSEUMone grant, 2022 · $133k
- GCGUILFORD COLLEGEone grant, 2022 · $105k
- CFCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER GREENSBORO (TANGER CENTER)one grant, 2020 · $100k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To serve as greensboro, north carolina's principal economic and community development organization. our goal is to strategically develop a vibrant community that creates, expands, and attracts business while advancing the quality of life…
Goodwill builds pathways that help people pursue the life they want to achieve. goodwill exists to help people see possibilities, seize opportunities, and prosper. we partner with individuals to identify their strengths, interests and…
To recruit new businesses to winston-salem and forsyth county in order to facilitate growth and economic diversification in the area.
Together with its diverse communities, the organization collects objects and stories, connects generations, and challenges people to explore our city's past, present and future. the museum sparks wonder through bold exhibitions and…
Greater winston-salem inc. is a leading business organization in winston- salem and forsyth county. the organization is focused on establishing winston-salem as a technology-driven economic center. greater winston-salem inc. offers…
The carolinas gateway partnership is dedicated to the creation of community wealth through the retention, creation, and expansion of business opportunities in tarboro, rocky mount, and edgecombe county, north carolina.
The mission of the north carolina global health alliance is to advance north carolina as an international center for research, training, education, advocacy and business dedicated to improving the health of the world's communities. we…
Greensboro housing coalition is the advocate for fair, safe, and affordable housing. we help homeowners keep their homes by preventing foreclosure and promoting home maintenance. we help tenants resolve problems with their landlords to…
To build a thriving regional economy, enhance the community's quality of life, and strengthen member businesses.
Promoting and enhancing the economic growth and development of greenville county south carolina; gadc was formed by greenville county council.
Yfc reaches young people everywhere, working together with the local church and other likeminded partners to raise up lifelong followers of jesus who lead by their godliness in lifestyle, devotion to the word of god and prayer, passion for…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Theatre of Greensboro Inc and the most unlike its peers is Jericho House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
116 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 116 of the 165 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER GREENSBORO INC ↗
- Who funds GREENSBORO URBAN MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds ACTION GREENSBORO ↗
- Who funds READING CONNECTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds THE NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER OF GREENSBORO INC DBA GREENSBORO SCIENCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds YWCA Greensboro ↗
- Who funds UNITED ARTS COUNCIL OF GREENSBORO INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC INC ↗
- Who funds GUILFORD COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds GUILFORD TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC ↗
- Who funds GUILFORD EDUCATION ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds Adult Center for Enrichment Inc ↗
- Who funds Elon University ↗
- Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds BENNETT COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Greensboro College ↗
- Who funds THE SERVANT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds KELLIN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds A SIMPLE GESTURE - GREENSBORO INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH VILLAGES INC ↗
- Who funds WHEELS4HOPE ↗
- Who funds THE NUSSBAUM CENTER FOR ENTREPRENEURSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds GENERATIONED ↗
- Who funds NORTH CAROLINA FOLK FESTIVAL ↗
- Who funds WEST END MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds REACH OUT FIRST INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Greensboro Inc · The Cemala Foundation Inc · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Weaver Foundation Inc · The Mary Lynn Richardson Fund · Moses Cone - Wesley Long Community Health Foundation · Hillsdale Fund · The Cannon Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Greensboro Inc · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · Well-Spring Retirement Community Inc · The Joseph M Bryan Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Tannenbaum-Sternberger Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.