· Private foundation
Jt-Minnie Maude Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k654 grants · $1.4M
- $10k–50k20 grants · $516k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $376k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Danville Life Saving and First Aid Crew Inc | $220,000 |
| Gods Storehouse Incorporated | $55,000 |
| Olde Dominion Agriculture Foundation Inc | $50,967 |
| Danville-Pittsylvania Cancer Association | $50,000 |
| Boys & Girls Clubs of the Danville Area | $48,000 |
| Boys & Girls Clubs of the Danville Area | $41,200 |
| Hurt Volunteer Fire Department Inc | $40,000 |
| The Garden Club of Danville | $38,295 |
| Danville Life Saving and First Aid Crew Inc | $38,207 |
| Brosville Community Fire Department Inc | $35,000 |
| Danville Church Based Tutorial Program Inc | $32,625 |
| Big Brothers and Big Sisters of Danville Area Incorporated | $26,000 |
| The Salvation Army | $25,000 |
| Gods Pit Crew Inc | $25,000 |
| Mount Hermon Volunteer Fire Department Inc | $22,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–21, $69k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against -36% for the ones you funded once.
1152 repeat relationships — 335 still active in FY2025, 817 since wound down; 331 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $551k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DLDANVILLE LIFE SAVING AND FIRST AID CREW INC8× · 2017–2025 · $819k · revenue +347%
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DANVILLE AREA INC9× · 2017–2025 · $669k · revenue +2%
- ODOLDE DOMINION AGRICULTURAL FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2025 · $524k · revenue +126%
Funded once
- TOTown of Chatham Volunteer Fire Department2× · 2023–2024 · $106k
- PCPittsylvania County Parks and Recreationone grant, 2019 · $100k
- YOYMCA of Danville Vaone grant, 2020 · $44k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the DUNCANVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT, INC. is the delivery of life safety services. The department provides 24-hour emergency response to a variety of critical situations, primarily fires.
Volunteer fire fighting and rescue services.
Provide Fire Prevention & Protection Services
Community volunteer fire company providing fire protection and fire fighting services, ambulance and rescue service and other emergency services to the town of denton, md.
Volunteer fire protection and training
All volunteer fire department provides fire and rescue services to the surrounding communities.
Fire protection for the City of Lewisburg, WV and surrounding areas
Local volunteer fire department providing fire protection and rescue services to the citizens of romney wv and surrounding areas.
Fire prevention and protection in bluemont and surrounding areas
Non profit volunteer fire department for the city of vienna, wv and surrounding areas. committed to educating communities about fire and safety.
Providing public fire protection and emergency rescue services.
Fire protection services for dolphin, va and surrounding communities
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Danville Pittsylvania County Chamber Foundation and the most unlike its peers is White Oak Grove Outreach Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 26. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DANVILLE LIFE SAVING AND FIRST AID CREW INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DANVILLE AREA INC ↗
- Who funds DANVILLE SCIENCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds OLDE DOMINION AGRICULTURAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GRETNA RESCUE SQUAD INC DBA GRETNA FIRE & RESCUE ↗
- Who funds GODS PIT CREW INC ↗
- Who funds RINGGOLD VOLUNTEER FIRE & RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds DANVILLE AREA TRAINING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNT HERMON VOLUNTEER FIRE & RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds Danville Church and Community Tutorial Program ↗
- Who funds BLAIRS FIRE & RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds BACHELORS HALL VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
- Who funds DANVILLE PITTSYLVANIA CANCER ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHATHAM RESCUE SQUAD ↗
- Who funds RENAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
- Who funds HURT VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
- Who funds DANVILLE COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CASCADE COMMUNITY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
- Who funds DANVILLE SPEECH AND HEARING CENTER ↗
- Who funds TUNSTALL VOLUNTEER FIRE & RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds Gretna Volunteer Fire Dept Inc ↗
- Who funds THE INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED LEARNING AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BROSVILLE COMMUNITY FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
- Who funds RIVER BEND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
- Who funds DRY FORK VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNT CROSS VOLUNTEER FIRE & RESCUE DEPT INC ↗
- Who funds HAVEN OF THE DAN RIVER REGION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of the Dan River Region · Alexander Berkeley Carrington Jr & Ruth Simpson Carrington Charitable Trust · Danville Regional Foundation · Womack Foundation · Hughes Memorial Home · Kiwanis Club of Danville Foundation · United Way of Danville-Pittsylvania County · George and Sarah Buchanan Foundation · Centra Health Inc · 640 Community Rescue Squad · Foster Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jt-Minnie Maude Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.