Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Fredman Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
49
Grants FY2024still arriving
16
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.

Health$3.6MEducation$2.6MEnvironment$1.6MInternational$1.2MPhilanthropy$1.0MCivil Rights$625kArts & Culture$533kYouth Development$383kOther$0
02FY2024 · 49 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k27 grants · $677k
  • $50k–250k19 grants · $1.3M
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$30,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$52M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BREAKTHROUGH COLLABORATIVE$250,000
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF LAW$125,000
PADDLERS FOR HUMANITY$100,000
EARTHJUSTICE$100,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA$100,000
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$100,000
THE NATURE CONSERVATORY$100,000
BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE$75,000
GIVEWELL$70,000
THE LIFE YOU CAN SAVE$60,000
THE TROY ANDREWS FOUNDATION INC$60,000
DIRECT RELIEF$55,000
VILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND INC$54,000
ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION$50,000
OPEN SPACE INSTITUTE$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $110k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR GROUP HOMES INC: $10k → 8%RETREAT INC: $30k → 7%RETREAT INC: $25k → 7%BRIDGEHAMPTOM CHILD CARE & RECREATION CENTER: $25k → 7%BRIDGEHAMPTON CHILD CARE & RECREATIONAL CENTER INC: $20k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
IA
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
DC
LA
AL
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 8% of Fredman Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Fredman Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.9% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$11M · 45 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.

45 repeat relationships — 32 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
20

Total granted

$11M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+8%

Still filing today

89%
85%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $519k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentInternationalEducationFood & NutritionCrime & LegalPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    THE BREAKTHROUGH COLLABORATIVE
    5× · 2019–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +148%
  • PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $900k · revenue +1%
  • RE
    RANSOM EVERGLADES SCHOOL INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $500k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • VC
    VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT
    one grant, 2019 · $500k
  • THE BAIL PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2020 · $118k · revenue -85%
  • FARM SHARE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +4%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
2
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
3
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
4
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
5
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
6
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
7
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
8
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
9
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
10
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
11
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
12
Wildaid Inc

Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Open Space Institute Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Life You Can Save. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …Elementary Literacy TutoringChristian Missionary Organi…Jewish Community Organizati…Domestic Violence ServicesImmigrant Worker SupportCommunity FoundationsCommunity College Foundatio…Youth Development ServicesFood Banks and PantriesPolicy Research and AdvocacyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Independent K-12 SchoolsCancer Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%25%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%30%35–55yr16%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr13%35%35–55yr16%23%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/75
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,490

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

74 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 74 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
74/74
Grantees still filing
52/74
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL — $2,500,000 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITALUNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF LAW — $575,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF LAWVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT — $500,000 · OtherVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTTHE NATURE CONSERVATORY — $275,000 · Other+35 more — $2,041,500 · Other+35 moreTHE BREAKTHROUGH COLLABORATIVE — $1,035,000 · EducationTHE BREAKTHROUGH COL…RANSOM EVERGLADES SCHOOL INC — $500,000 · EducationRANSOM EVERGLADES SC…THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $446,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLU…WALKING MOUNTAINS — $115,000 · EducationBREAKTHROUGH MIAMI INC — $89,800 · Education+4 more — $140,000 · Education+4 morePANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC — $900,000 · HealthPANCREATIC…PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $100,000 · HealthPLANNED PA…MALARIA CONSORTIUM US INC — $86,000 · HealthMALARIA CO…The Fistula Foundation — $79,000 · HealthThe Fistul…EARTHJUSTICE — $350,000 · EnvironmentEARTHJUST…WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $300,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WIL…COLORADO OPEN LANDS — $140,000 · EnvironmentCOLORADO …ROARING FORK CONSERVANCY — $65,000 · EnvironmentROARING F…OLD-GROWTH FOREST NETWORK INC — $60,000 · EnvironmentOLD-GROWT…OPEN SPACE INSTITUTE INC — $50,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $45,000 · EnvironmentSUNSHINE STATE BIODIVERSITY GROUP — $40,000 · Environment+3 more — $59,000 · EnvironmentYOUTHPOWER365 — $300,000 · PhilanthropyYOUTHPOWE…ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION — $300,000 · PhilanthropyROBIN HOO…PADDLERS FOR HUMANITY INC — $220,000 · PhilanthropyPADDLERS …The Life You Can Save — $113,000 · PhilanthropyThe Life …UNITED WAY MIAMI INC — $100,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WA…THE CLEAR FUND — $70,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CLEAR…International Rescue Committee INC — $300,000 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEF — $260,000 · InternationalVILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND — $135,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $75,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $60,000 · InternationalNEW ISRAEL FUND — $54,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LATET HUMANITARIAN AID INC — $50,000 · International+5 more — $96,800 · InternationalTHE TROY ANDREWS FOUNDATION — $360,000 · Arts & CultureVILAR PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC — $145,000 · Arts & CultureHUDSON RIVER MARITIME MUSEUM — $25,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$5,891,500Education$2,325,800Health$1,165,000Environment$1,109,000Philanthropy$1,103,000International$1,030,800Arts & Culture$530,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE BREAKTHROUGH COLLABORATIVE — $1,035,000 over 5y, 8.7% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC — $900,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetRANSOM EVERGLADES SCHOOL INC — $500,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $446,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TROY ANDREWS FOUNDATION — $360,000 over 6y, 19% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE — $350,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $300,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTHPOWER365 — $300,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $300,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION — $300,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF — $260,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPADDLERS FOR HUMANITY INC — $220,000 over 4y, 61% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY — $195,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC — $170,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $150,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LITERACY PROJECT — $150,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetVILAR PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC — $145,000 over 6y, 95% of budgetCOLORADO OPEN LANDS — $140,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetVILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND — $135,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetINTERNATIONAL SNOW LEOPARD TRUST — $130,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetTHE BAIL PROJECT INC — $118,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWALKING MOUNTAINS — $115,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetThe Life You Can Save — $113,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetAlices Kids Inc — $105,000 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFARM SHARE INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY MIAMI INC — $100,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH MIAMI INC — $89,800 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetMALARIA CONSORTIUM US INC — $86,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCODEART INC — $83,000 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetThe Fistula Foundation — $79,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $75,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC — $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CLEAR FUND — $70,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC — $70,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetROARING FORK CONSERVANCY — $65,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetOLD-GROWTH FOREST NETWORK INC — $60,000 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRetreat Inc — $55,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND — $54,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOPEN SPACE INSTITUTE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LATET HUMANITARIAN AID INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetMI VECINOS — $50,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetFeeding America — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPRINGS FOOD PANTRY INC — $45,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetBridgehampton Child Care and Recreational Center Inc — $45,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BREAKTHROUGH COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds RANSOM EVERGLADES SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds THE TROY ANDREWS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTHPOWER365 ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds PADDLERS FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LITERACY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds VILAR PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO OPEN LANDS ↗
  • Who funds VILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL SNOW LEOPARD TRUST ↗
  • Who funds THE BAIL PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds WALKING MOUNTAINS ↗
  • Who funds The Life You Can Save ↗
  • Who funds Alices Kids Inc ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds FARM SHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY MIAMI INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH MIAMI INC ↗
  • Who funds MALARIA CONSORTIUM US INC ↗
  • Who funds CODEART INC ↗
  • Who funds The Fistula Foundation ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CLEAR FUND ↗
  • Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundThe Goldman Sachs Cha…The Fine and Greenwal…Cyril F & Marie O'Nei…National Philanthropi…The Miami Foundation …ImpactassetsincColorado Gives Founda…Vanguard Charitable E…Morgan Stanley Global…PatagoniaorgMightycause Charitabl…
Jewish Communal FundNY20.2× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Fine and Greenwald Foundation · Cyril F & Marie O'Neil Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Miami Foundation Inc · Impactassetsinc · Colorado Gives Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Patagoniaorg · Mightycause Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Fredman Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • United Way Miami Inc — 23% of income from government
  • Farm Share Inc — 6% of income from government
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 84 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home