· Private foundation
Cyril F & Marie O'Neil Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k87 grants · $226k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $132k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $66k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SOCIETY OF THE SACRED HEART | $65,500 |
| WGBH EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION | $33,000 |
| BON SECOURS ST MARYS HOSPITAL OF RICHMOND LLC | $18,000 |
| OURAY ICE PARK INC | $15,000 |
| CLEVELAND HEARING & SPEECH CENTER | $13,000 |
| METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART | $12,500 |
| ST TIMOTHY'S SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| BOCA GRANDE HEALTH CLINIC FDN | $10,000 |
| MALOTO | $10,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO | $10,000 |
| LEADING WITH LOVE | $9,000 |
| NATIONAL LINKS TRUST | $8,500 |
| CHILD MIND INSTITUTE | $8,000 |
| ANNA JULIA COOPER SCHOOL BUILDING HOPE | $8,000 |
| TABOR ACADEMY | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $108k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.
150 repeat relationships — 72 still active in FY2025, 78 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $77k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MMMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART8× · 2017–2025 · $88k · revenue +58%
- CHCLEVELAND HEARING AND SPEECH CENTER9× · 2017–2025 · $82k · revenue +41%
- TRTHE RIVERS SCHOOL CORPORATION5× · 2017–2022 · $66k · revenue +24%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $18k
- FIFREEDOM INSTITUTE INCone grant, 2021 · $11k · revenue -49%
- BBBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE DESone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…
Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vail Health Services Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Ouray Mountain Rescue Team Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.6% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
171 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 171 of the 267 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE WANG CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds COLORADO OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CORPORATION OF ST TIMOTHY'S SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds CLEVELAND HEARING AND SPEECH CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE RIVERS SCHOOL CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds HOPE IGNITES NORTHEASTERN OHIO INC ↗
- Who funds OURAY ICE PARK INC ↗
- Who funds WGBH Educational Foundation ↗
- Who funds CHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TABOR ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds LEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds FAIR CHANCE ↗
- Who funds MALOTO INC ↗
- Who funds LEADING WITH LOVE INC ↗
- Who funds NEW PROFIT INC ↗
- Who funds DENISON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Emory University ↗
- Who funds THE NUCI PHILLIPS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COLORADO ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds WESTSIDE PACIFIC VILLAGES ↗
- Who funds BOULDER PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND ↗
- Who funds PENCILS FOR KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds RANSOM EVERGLADES SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds Young Leadership Addiction Awareness Inc ↗
- Who funds Bon Secours - St Mary's Hospital of Richmond Inc ↗
- Who funds Dream With Me Foundation ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Western Colorado Community Foundation Inc · The Cleveland Foundation · The Bessemer Giving Fund · Rose Community Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Kelton Family Foundation · Madmone Inc · Fredman Family Foundation Inc · The Lozick Family Foundation · Community Foundation Boulder County
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Cyril F & Marie O'Neil Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Vietnam Veterans Workshop Inc Dba New England Center and Home for Veterans — 66% of income from government
- Mercy Corps — 47% of income from government
- Boston Harbor Now Inc — 45% of income from government
- Bridge Over Troubled Waters Inc — 32% of income from government
- More Than Words Inc — 24% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Saint Francis House Inc — 18% of income from government
- Heading Home Inc — 17% of income from government
- Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
- Freedom Reads Inc — 12% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- New England Aquarium Corporation — 12% of income from government
- Pine Street Inn Inc — 11% of income from government
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
- The Wang Center for the Performing Arts Inc — 10% of income from government
- Worcester Polytechnic Institute — 8% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Greenwich — 7% of income from government
- Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc — 4% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts Inc — 3% of income from government
- Babson College — 3% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston College — 3% of income from government
- Lewis & Clark College — 2% of income from government
- University of Hartford — 1% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Middlebury College — 1% of income from government
- Als One Inc — 1% of income from government
- Wgbh Educational Foundation — 1% of income from government
- Incarnation Center Inc — 1% of income from government
- Nantucket Historical Association — 1% of income from government
- Rollins College — 0% of income from government
- Artists Association of Nantucket Inc — 0% of income from government
- Rosie's Place Inc — 0% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- Choate Rosemary Hall Foundation Incorporated — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Cyril F & Marie O'Neil Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Cyril F & Marie O'Neil Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.