Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Fine and Greenwald Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
216
Grants FY2024still arriving
22
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Civil Rights$4.0MEnvironment$3.7MInternational$3.0MHealth$2.3MFood & Nutrition$2.0MYouth Development$1.8MHuman Services$1.8MArts & Culture$1.8MOther$0
02FY2024 · 216 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k56 grants · $229k
  • $10k–50k131 grants · $2.1M
  • $50k–250k26 grants · $2.0M
  • $250k+3 grants · $900k
$10,000
Median grant
22
States reached
$67M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ACLU FOUNDATION$300,000
NEW ISRAEL FUND$300,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$300,000
MIAMI WATERKEEPER$200,000
THE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION$200,000
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND$200,000
UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS$100,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTH EAST$100,000
ACLU FOUNDATION OF FLORIDA$100,000
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER$80,000
EAST END FOOD INSTITUTE$75,000
CARE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$70,000
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC$60,000
PROJECT MOST$55,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 24% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DISABILITY OPPORTUNITY FUND INC: $1.0M → 6%DISABILITY OPPORTUNITY FUND INC: $150k → 6%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $5k → 14%DISABILITY OPPORTUNITY FUND INC: $100k → 6%DISABILITY OPPORTUNITY FUND INC: $25k → 6%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 14%DISABILITY OPPORTUNITY FUND INC: $15k → 6%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $10k → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $7k → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $6k → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $6k → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $5k → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $5k → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $2k → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $2k → 7%REFUGEE ASSISTANCE ALLIANCE: $5k → 15%REFUGEE ASSISTANCE ALLIANCE: $5k → 15%HARLEM CHILDRENS ZONE: $25k → 17%HARLEM CHILDRENS ZONE: $25k → 17%HARLEM CHILDRENS ZONE: $25k → 17%HARLEM CHILDRENS ZONE: $20k → 17%HARLEM CHILDRENS ZONE: $20k → 17%HARLEM CHILDRENS ZONE: $20k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $2k → 17%HARLEM CHILDRENS ZONE: $20k → 17%HARLEM CHILDRENS ZONE: $15k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $500 → 17%GIRLS WHO CODE INC: $10k → 17%GIRLS WHO CODE INC: $10k → 17%GIRLS WHO CODE INC: $10k → 17%GIRLS WHO CODE INC: $10k → 17%JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES: $30k → 15%JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES: $30k → 15%JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES: $25k → 15%JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES: $25k → 15%JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES: $25k → 15%JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES: $20k → 15%JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES: $20k → 15%JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10k → 15%ALLIANCE FOR LGBTQ YOUTH: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NH
WA
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
SD
IA
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
DC
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$22M · 190 repeat orgs$717k to everyone else

190 repeat relationships — 162 still active in FY2024, 28 since wound down; 44 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

190
32

Total granted

$22M
$244k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+47%

Still filing today

73%
66%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $474k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentInternationalArts & CultureEducationCivil RightsHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OY
    OVERTOWN YOUTH CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +202%
  • TD
    THE DISABILITY FUND INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +57%
  • AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +110%

Funded once

  • BP
    BOREALIS PHILANTHROPY
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +13%
  • SF
    SEARCH FOR COMMON GROUND
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +8%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI HILLEL
    one grant, 2017 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
2
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
3
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
4
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
5
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
6
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
7
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
8
Center for International Environmental Law Inc

To investigate, research, write, publish, present conferences and teach with respect to global, regional, transboundary, and comparative environmental issues and to make the findings from such activities available to the general public; to…

International
9
Namati Inc

Namati, inc. (namati) is dedicated to putting the law in people's hands. we strive to build a just world, in which every one of us can take part in the decisions and demand accountability from the institutions that affect our lives.…

Crime & Legal
10
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
11
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
12
Observer Research Foundation America

Organization mission the observer research foundation america orf america is an independent, non-partisan, and nonprofit organization in washington dc dedicated to addressing policy challenges facing the united states, india, and their…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ms Foundation for Women Inc and the most unlike its peers is Thomas Moran Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPolicy Research and AdvocacyEnvironmental Conservation …Christian Missionary Organi…Women & Girls Leadership De…Local Food System Organizat…Local History MuseumsCommunity FoundationsCommunity FoundationsDance Arts OrganizationsIndependent K-12 SchoolsLgbtq+ Community SupportImmigrant Worker SupportHealth Access Advocacy and …Community Arts CentersFood Banks and PantriesJewish Community Organizati…Youth Development Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%22%10–20yr16%28%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr16%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%23%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.9%2/218
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,347

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

214 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 214 of the 278 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
31
Early backer (in before they grew)
210/214
Grantees still filing
140/214
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD — $1,235,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODACLU FOUNDATION OF FLORIDA — $470,000 · OtherSTONE BARNS CENTER FOR FOOD — $430,000 · Other+125 more — $10,093,658 · Other+125 moreNEW ISRAEL FUND — $1,278,000 · InternationalNEW ISRAEL FU…HIAS INC — $260,000 · InternationalHIAS INCMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $220,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS…THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC — $200,000 · InternationalTHE UNION OF …AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC — $200,000 · InternationalAMERICAN JEWI…WATERORG — $125,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $106,050 · International+10 more — $512,505 · International+10 moreBISCAYNE BAY WATERKEEPER INC — $463,215 · EnvironmentBISCAYNE BA…ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $405,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENT…NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $400,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RES…350ORG — $190,000 · Environment350ORGOCEANA INC — $155,000 · EnvironmentOCEANA INCURBAN OASIS PROJECT INC — $114,496 · EnvironmentPECONIC LAND TRUST INC — $100,000 · EnvironmentPECONIC BAYKEEPER INC — $95,000 · EnvironmentTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION — $90,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP — $87,000 · Environment+10 more — $403,585 · Environment+10 moreAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $1,020,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN …NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC — $160,000 · Civil RightsNAACP LEG…NATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER — $160,000 · Civil RightsNATIONAL …NAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC — $155,000 · Civil RightsNAACP EMP…MS FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN INC — $150,000 · Civil RightsMS FOUNDA…REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES — $130,000 · Civil RightsREFUGEE &…Florida Immigrant Coalition Inc — $105,000 · Civil RightsTREVOR PROJECT INC — $82,500 · Civil Rights+5 more — $150,000 · Civil Rights+5 moreTHE DISABILITY FUND INC — $1,290,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $185,450 · Human ServicesHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC — $170,000 · Human Services+2 more — $83,000 · Human ServicesOVERTOWN YOUTH CENTER INC — $1,620,450 · Youth Development+1 more — $12,090 · Youth DevelopmentBREAKTHROUGH MIAMI INC — $265,000 · EducationCARE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INC — $210,000 · EducationUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC — $190,000 · EducationAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND — $150,000 · EducationBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY — $131,000 · EducationMEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA — $120,000 · EducationPROJECT MOST INC — $82,010 · EducationBEACON COLLEGE PREP INC — $50,450 · EducationBLACK GIRLS CODE INC — $50,000 · Education+6 more — $197,073 · Education
Other$12,228,658International$2,901,555Environment$2,503,296Civil Rights$2,112,500Human Services$1,728,450Youth Development$1,632,540Education$1,445,533

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOVERTOWN YOUTH CENTER INC — $1,620,450 over 8y, 5.3% of budgetTHE DISABILITY FUND INC — $1,290,000 over 5y, 17% of budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND — $1,278,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $1,020,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetBISCAYNE BAY WATERKEEPER INC — $463,215 over 8y, 7.8% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $405,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $400,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION — $400,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetEQUAL RIGHTS ADVOCATES — $365,000 over 8y, 5.8% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $310,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $270,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJACK MARTIN FUND INC — $270,000 over 8y, 17% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH MIAMI INC — $265,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetHIAS INC — $260,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSIERRA CLUB — $253,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC — $225,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $220,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGREEN AMERICA — $220,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetCARE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INC — $210,000 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC — $200,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC — $200,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC — $190,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budget350ORG — $190,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetFIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE — $190,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $185,450 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD & WATER WATCH — $175,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $170,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC — $170,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC — $160,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER — $160,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetNAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC — $155,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetOCEANA INC — $155,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLegal Services of Greater Miami Inc — $155,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND — $150,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMS FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN INC — $150,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetPUBLIC CITIZEN INC — $135,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $135,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY — $131,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES — $130,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWATERORG — $125,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS — $125,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC — $120,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA — $120,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFARM SHARE INC — $119,450 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBig Sunday — $115,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetURBAN OASIS PROJECT INC — $114,496 over 5y, 9.0% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $109,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OVERTOWN YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DISABILITY FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BISCAYNE BAY WATERKEEPER INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL RIGHTS ADVOCATES ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds JACK MARTIN FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH MIAMI INC ↗
  • Who funds HIAS INC ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB ↗
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds GREEN AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds CARE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds 350ORG ↗
  • Who funds FIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD & WATER WATCH ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC ↗
  • Who funds NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Miami Foundation …The Batchelor Foundat…The Goldman Sachs Cha…Jewish Communal FundMightycause Charitabl…Imperfect Family Foun…Kate Cassidy Foundati…Greater Miami Jewish …Daniel L Nir & Jill E…The Ford FoundationThe New York Communit…Allegany Franciscan M…
The Miami Foundation IncFL39.6× affinity25 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Miami Foundation Inc · The Batchelor Foundation Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Imperfect Family Foundation · Kate Cassidy Foundation · Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc · Daniel L Nir & Jill E Braufman Family Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Allegany Franciscan Ministries Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Fine and Greenwald Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 140%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Farm Aid Inc — 100% of income from government
  • Refugee Assistance Alliance Inc — 92% of income from government
  • Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
  • Mercy Corps — 47% of income from government
  • Biscayne Bay Waterkeeper Inc — 19% of income from government
  • Urban Oasis Project Inc — 12% of income from government
  • City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Root Capital Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Reach Out and Read Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Brandeis University — 9% of income from government
  • Care Elementary School Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Farm Share Inc — 6% of income from government
  • Feeding South Florida Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Beacon College Prep Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Public Justice Center Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Legal Services of Greater Miami Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Jewish Community Services of South Florida Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Real Organic Project Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Glbtq Legal Advocates & Defenders Inc — 0% of income from government
  • South Florida Pbs Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
14get no government money at all
49report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Fine and Greenwald Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Fine and Greenwald Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 278 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines