Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Duke University

To provide a superior liberal education, to prepare future members of learned professions, to advance the frontiers of knowledge, and to help those who suffer, cure disease, and promote health

$518M
Granted FY2025still arriving
101
Grants FY2025still arriving
20
States reached
$345k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Education$6.2MHealth$5.8MCommunity Improvement$4.4MHousing & Shelter$3.0MInternational$1.6MArts & Culture$1.2MReligion$1.2MScience & Tech$1.1MOther$0
02FY2025 · 101 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 101 grants below total $3,835,569 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $518,261,261 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $514,425,692 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k30 grants · $208k
  • $10k–50k52 grants · $738k
  • $50k–250k15 grants · $1.7M
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.2M
$11,000
Median grant
20
States reached
$22.1B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITURE INC$344,591
PACIFIC PEDIATRIC NEURO ONCOLOGY$328,453
DURHAM TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE$283,004
BRIGHAM AND WOMENS HOSPITAL INC$280,000
EMILY KRZYZEWSKI FAMILY LIFE CENTER$212,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$202,591
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF DURHAM$165,000
SOLAR FREEZE$150,000
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA$126,116
RESEARCH FOR A STRONGER AMERICA$105,000
CARING HOUSE INC$103,000
RESEARCH TRIANGLE FOUNDATION OF NC$100,000
NATIONAL HUMANITIES CENTER$100,000
NC STATE UNIVERSITY$96,086
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION INC$75,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $758k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SOUTH CAROLINA SPINAL CORD INJURY A: $10k → 16%SHACKLE FREE COMM OUTREACH AGENCY: $6k → 12%EL REFUGIO INC: $7k → 16%CAMP KESEM NATIONAL: $19k → 14%CAMP KESEM NATIONAL: $6k → 14%COALITION FOR SPIRITUAL AND PUBLIC: $10k → 14%DIAPER BANK OF NC: $9k → 13%SE RALEIGH PROMISE INC: $7k → 8%YMCA OF THE TRIANGLE AREA INC: $20k → 8%YMCA OF THE TRIANGLE AREA INC: $20k → 8%YMCA OF THE TRIANGLE AREA INC: $20k → 8%YMCA OF THE TRIANGLE AREA INC: $21k → 8%MIRACLE LEAGUE OF THE TRIANGLE: $70k → 8%YOUTH VILLAGES: $30k → 11%KRAMDEN INSTITUTE: $2k → 11%KRAMDEN INSTITUTE: $2k → 11%KRAMDEN INSTITUTE: $1k → 11%DIAPER BANK OF NC: $85k → 11%BELIEVERS UNITED FOR PROGRESS: $58k → 11%BELIEVERS UNITED FOR PROGRESS: $10k → 11%DURHAM CONGREGATIONS IN ACTION: $82k → 11%LATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT C: $75k → 11%YMCA OF THE TRIANGLE INC: $45k → 11%STEPUP DURHAM: $34k → 11%STEPUP DURHAM: $21k → 11%STEPUP DURHAM: $19k → 11%DIAPER BANK OF NC: $15k → 11%STEPUP DURHAM: $8k → 11%STEPUP DURHAM: $8k → 11%DURHAM CONGREGATIONS IN ACTION: $7k → 11%DURHAM CONGREGATIONS IN ACTION: $7k → 11%LGBTQ CENTER OF DURHAM INC: $5k → 11%KRAMDEN INSTITUTE INC: $8k → 11%LGBTQ CENTER OF DURHAM INC: $5k → 11%JUBILEE HOME: $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$19M · 124 repeat orgs$8.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.

124 repeat relationships — 52 still active in FY2025, 72 since wound down; 47 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

124
178

Total granted

$19M
$7.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+24%

Still filing today

77%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $865k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EMILY KRZYZEWSKI CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +78%
  • TP
    THE PACIFIC PEDIATRIC NEURO-ONCOLOG CONSORTIUM FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $1.6M · revenue +6% · 34% of their budget
  • HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF DURHAM INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • SV
    Self-Help Ventures Fundgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $2.5M · revenue +165%
  • Carolina Small Business Development Fundgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1.0M · revenue +41%
  • UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $500k · revenue +14%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Disability Rights North Carolina

Disability rights north carolina is a legal advocacy organization that advances and defends the rights of people with all types of disabilities, of all ages, throughout north carolina.

—
2
North Carolina Business Leaders for Educ

The mission of north carolina business leaders for education (dba best nc) is to unite an engaged and informed business perspective to dramatically transform and improve north carolina's education system. our goal is for every student to…

Education
3
Research Triangle Institute

Research Triangle Institute is one of the world's leading research institutes, dedicated to improving the human condition by turning knowledge into practice. Our staff of more than 5,300 provides research and technical (continued on…

Science & Tech
4
Research Triangle Cleantech Cluster

Research Triangle Cleantech Cluster's mission is to accelerate cleantech innovation and adoption in the reseach triangle region and beyond.

Community Improvement
5
Center for Participatory Change

Igniting collective power. Transforming systems of oppression. Healing in community.

Community Improvement
6
Action Institute Nc

Action institute nc is a community organization and citizens action group that organizes residents of low-wealth communities and constituencies most of whom are people of color- to represent their own interests on issues of social and…

—
7
The North Carolina Coalition Against Domestic Violence

Nccadv leads the state's movement to end domestic violence and to enhance work with survivors through collaborations, innovative trainings, prevention, technical assistance, state policy development and legal advocacy.

—
8
Forward Justice Action Network

Forward Justice Action Network is a nonprofit with the purpose to engage in educational and advocacy activities to promote political and grassroots support for public policies that advance racial social and economic justice in North…

Human Services
9
NourishNC Inc

NourishNC, Inc.'s goal is to provide healthy food to hungry children, empowering them to succeed in the classroom and in their community

Food & Nutrition
10
Triangle Global Health Consortium Inc

The mission of the north carolina global health alliance is to advance north carolina as an international center for research, training, education, advocacy and business dedicated to improving the health of the world's communities. we…

Health
11
The Resiliency Collaborative Inc

Trc partners with bipoc youth and their ecosystems to strengthen their sense of identity, belonging, and purpose so they can create a healthier, more equitable wake county.

Education
12
North Carolina Aids Action Network

The NCAAN improves the lives of people living with HIV/AIDS and affected communities through outreach and public education, policy advocacy and community-building to increase visibility and mutual support of people living with HIV/AIDS…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Project Access of Durham County and the most unlike its peers is J-Jireh Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCancer Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Affordable Housing Developm…Local Food System Organizat…United Way AffiliatesPolicy Research and AdvocacyYouth Sports ProgramsPublic Library OperationsYouth Development CentersYouth Mentoring ProgramsFood Banks and PantriesMilitary Veterans SupportHealth Access Advocacy and …Women & Girls Leadership De…Community FoundationsEnvironmental Conservation …Lgbtq+ Community SupportLocal History MuseumsIndependent K-12 SchoolsDance Arts OrganizationsCommunity Arts CentersElementary Literacy TutoringChristian Missionary Organi…Ymca Youth DevelopmentCommunity College Foundatio…Senior Support ServicesAffordable Housing Construc…Immigrant Worker Support
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%5%<5yr16%10%5–10yr20%22%10–20yr14%28%20–35yr12%16%35–55yr12%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%2%<5yr16%4%5–10yr20%21%10–20yr14%24%20–35yr12%35%35–55yr12%14%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%6/392
the rest of the field
15%
7,954/52,788

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

260 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 260 of the 353 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
67
Early backer (in before they grew)
247/260
Grantees still filing
160/260
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF DURHAM INC — $1,167,250 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF DURHAM INCThe Fund for Reconciliation Tolerance and Peace — $1,017,100 · OtherThe Fund for Reconciliation Tolerance and PeaceDURHAM TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $872,992 · OtherDURHAM TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGEDURHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $790,224 · OtherDURHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLSMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $787,452 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDCHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG LIBRARY — $470,000 · Other+127 more — $7,527,689 · Other+127 moreTHE PACIFIC PEDIATRIC NEURO-ONCOLOG CONSORTIUM FOUNDATION — $1,570,479 · HealthTHE PACIFIC PED…Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $927,495 · HealthDana-Farber Can…American Heart Association Inc — $287,750 · HealthAmerican Heart …CARING HOUSE INC — $205,200 · HealthCARING HOUSE IN…EL FUTURO INC — $162,638 · Health+16 more — $602,829 · Health+16 moreSelf-Help Ventures Fund — $2,500,000 · Community ImprovementSelf-Help Vent…THE COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT FUND — $329,333 · Community ImprovementTHE COMMUNITY …Reinvestment Partners — $293,000 · Community ImprovementReinvestment P…Communities In Partnership — $119,800 · Community Improvement+5 more — $281,236 · Community Improvement+5 moreDURHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $592,000 · EducationDURHAM PUBLIC…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $511,495 · EducationTHE BOARD OF …UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $500,000 · EducationUNC HEALTH FO…ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEASTERN RESEARCH LIBRARIES INC — $226,150 · EducationASSOCIATION O…West End Community Foundation Inc Dosali Reed-Bandele Executive Director — $194,011 · EducationWest End Comm…The North Carolina Albert Schweitzer Fellowship Inc — $163,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $107,500 · EducationSTUDENT U — $104,542 · Education+19 more — $734,003 · Education+19 moreEMILY KRZYZEWSKI CENTER INC — $1,966,877 · Recreation & Sports+2 more — $54,497 · Recreation & SportsCarolina Small Business Development Fund — $1,000,000 · Public BenefitHEALTHY LEARNERS INC — $100,000 · Public Benefit+1 more — $13,500 · Public BenefitDURHAM COMMUNITY LAND TRUSTEES INC — $788,870 · Housing & ShelterHOUSING FOR NEW HOPE — $74,002 · Housing & ShelterCASA — $52,163 · Housing & ShelterPRESERVING HOME INC — $35,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$12,632,707Health$3,756,391Community Improvement$3,523,369Education$3,132,701Recreation & Sports$2,021,374Public Benefit$1,113,500Housing & Shelter$950,035

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSelf-Help Ventures Fund — $2,500,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetEMILY KRZYZEWSKI CENTER INC — $1,966,877 over 9y, 11% of budgetTHE PACIFIC PEDIATRIC NEURO-ONCOLOG CONSORTIUM FOUNDATION — $1,570,479 over 3y, 34% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF DURHAM INC — $1,167,250 over 9y, 4.3% of budgetThe Fund for Reconciliation Tolerance and Peace — $1,017,100 over 2y, 88% of budgetCarolina Small Business Development Fund — $1,000,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $927,495 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDURHAM COMMUNITY LAND TRUSTEES INC — $788,870 over 5y, 8.7% of budgetDURHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $592,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $511,495 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $500,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT FUND — $329,333 over 6y, 11% of budgetNATIONAL HUMANITIES CENTER — $300,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetReinvestment Partners — $293,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $287,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFARMER FOODSHARE INC — $240,990 over 4y, 9.3% of budgetASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEASTERN RESEARCH LIBRARIES INC — $226,150 over 1y, 43% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE GREATER TRIANGLE INC — $215,618 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetCARING HOUSE INC — $205,200 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetWest End Community Foundation Inc Dosali Reed-Bandele Executive Director — $194,011 over 9y, 15% of budgetTRIANGLE RESIDENTIAL OPTIONS FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSERS INC — $193,700 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetSTEPUP DURHAM — $189,250 over 6y, 22% of budgetFAMILIES MOVING FORWARD — $184,450 over 5y, 6.8% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $176,316 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe North Carolina Albert Schweitzer Fellowship Inc — $163,000 over 7y, 19% of budgetEL FUTURO INC — $162,638 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetUrban Ministries of Durham Inc — $153,529 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetTransformation Lab Incorporated fka Transformation Lab Inc — $150,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetResearch Triangle Foundation of NC — $140,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetREALITY MINISTRIES INC — $133,022 over 3y, 9.5% of budgetThe Young Men's Christian Association of the Triangle Area Inc (4598) — $126,496 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDON'T EVER GIVE UP INC — $125,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPartners for Youth Opportunity — $123,945 over 4y, 11% of budgetMUSEUM OF DURHAM HISTORY — $120,600 over 5y, 6.3% of budgetCommunities In Partnership — $119,800 over 4y, 18% of budgetDIAPER BANK OF NORTH CAROLINA — $109,652 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $107,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTUDENT U — $104,542 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetHEALTHY LEARNERS INC — $100,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetSERVEMINNESOTA — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMADE IN DURHAM — $100,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetSENIOR PHARMASSIST INC — $98,616 over 5y, 5.3% of budgetLEGAL AID OF NORTH CAROLINA INC — $97,852 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetDurham Congregations in Action — $95,195 over 3y, 15% of budgetDURHAM CHILDREN'S INITIATIVE — $95,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetWALLTOWN CHILDRENS THEATRE — $93,535 over 8y, 7.8% of budgetCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC — $92,650 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTH CAROLINA — $91,883 over 2y, 4.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Triangle Community Fo…United Way of the Gre…Duke University Healt…The Mary Duke Biddle …Aj Fletcher FoundationThe Forest At Duke IncDurham Merchants Asso…Durham Congregations …Fox Family Foundation…Z Smith Reynolds Foun…The Leon Levine Found…The Burt's Bees Great…
Triangle Community Foundation IncNC130.9× affinity115 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Triangle Community Foundation Inc · United Way of the Greater Triangle Inc · Duke University Health System Inc · The Mary Duke Biddle Foundation Missionpost Pmb #101 · Aj Fletcher Foundation · The Forest At Duke Inc · Durham Merchants Association Charitable Foundation · Durham Congregations in Action · Fox Family Foundation Inc · Z Smith Reynolds Foundation Inc · The Leon Levine Foundation · The Burt's Bees Greater Good Foundation AKA THE BURT'S BEES FOUNDATION

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Duke University funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals — 67% of income from government
  • Icivics Inc — 13% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
  • United States Association for the Study of Pain Inc — 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
45report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 353 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home