Skip to content

Indiana · Nonprofit

PSYCHOLOGICAL CLINICAL SCIENCE ACCREDITATION SYSTEM INC

PSYCHOLOGICAL CLINICAL SCIENCE ACCREDITATION SYSTEM INC (Indiana) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $75,000 to it, the largest being WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ($60,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$303k
Funders on record
2
Grants received
$75k
Net assets
$1.3M
1/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 10%
01What it does

What Psychological Clinical Science Accreditation System Inc does

Mission

The psychological clinical science accreditation system (pcsas) is an independent, nonprofit organization whose aim is to provide rigorous, objective, and empirically based accreditation of ph.d. Programs in clinical psychology that adhere to a clinical science training model -- one that increases the quality and quantity of clinical scientists contributing to all aspects of public health and extends the science base for mental health care.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

  1. To date pcsas has accredited 48 programs in the united states and canada, with many others in various stages of the application process. These programs are among the most highly regarded in the field. For example, all 20 of the us news & world report's 20 top-ranked clinical psychology programs are pcsas accredited. Thirty-nine pcsas programs in the u.s. Are ranked in the top 50 (u.s. News only ranks u.s. Programs). And all 48 pcsas programs are ranked highly by the national academy of sciences; have graduates who score higher on average than those non-pcsas programs on state licensing exams; have students who "match" at a higher rate in internship placements; and are distinguished by the publication records of pcsas faculty.

    $134,867 spent$60,000 earned by the program
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $134,867.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($146k) Expenses 100 ($272k) Net assets 100 ($567k)2018 Revenue 74 ($108k) Expenses 66 ($179k) Net assets 88 ($496k)2019 Revenue 62 ($91k) Expenses 62 ($169k) Net assets 74 ($417k)2020 Revenue 413 ($602k) Expenses 66 ($179k) Net assets 148 ($840k)2021 Revenue 269 ($393k) Expenses 82 ($222k) Net assets 178 ($1.0M)2022 Revenue 257 ($375k) Expenses 78 ($211k) Net assets 207 ($1.2M)2023 Revenue 131 ($191k) Expenses 79 ($214k) Net assets 203 ($1.2M)2024 Revenue 200 ($292k) Expenses 78 ($213k) Net assets 217 ($1.2M)2025 Revenue 208 ($303k) Expenses 71 ($194k) Net assets 236 ($1.3M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (208)Expenses (71)Net assets (236)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $492k to $880k (+79%).

$571k
$497k
$492k
$880k
$1.1M
$1.3M
$1.2M
$1.2M
$1.3M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

73% of PSYCHOLOGICAL CLINICAL SCIENCE ACCREDITATION SYSTEM INC’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (79% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 882 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$126k
’17
−$71k
’18
−$79k
’19
$422k
’20
$171k
’21
$163k
’22
−$23k
’23
$79k
’24
$109k
’25
48
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Joseph E Steinmetz

Executive director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed121210101011101010
Joined·+0+2+0+0+2+0+1+2
No longer listed·04001112
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2022: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose $15k → $30k.

Funder
'17
'22
'24*
'25*
total
$60k
Duke Universityunclassified
$15k
funders
1
1
1
1

From the IRS filings of PSYCHOLOGICAL CLINICAL SCIENCE ACCREDITATION SYSTEM INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

PSYCHOLOGICAL CLINICAL SCIENCE ACCREDITATION SYSTEM INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 80% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund PSYCHOLOGICAL CLINICAL SCIENCE ACCREDITATION SYSTEM INC.

80%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2022 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

PSYCHOLOGICAL CLINICAL SCIENCE ACCREDITATION SYSTEM INC draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Indiana, across 2 states in all.

MO
NC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’22
Indiana out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

PSYCHOLOGICAL CLINICAL SCIENCE ACCREDITATION SYSTEM INC runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 453 science & tech nonprofits its size.

Operating margin36% · top quartile
Months of reserve47.5mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)10% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 453 science & tech nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like PSYCHOLOGICAL CLINICAL SCIENCE ACCREDITATION SYSTEM INC

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Indiana

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

69% of spending goes to programs.

Program 69%Management 15%Fundraising 16%

Governance

9
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

97%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PSYCHOLOGICAL CLINICAL SCIENCE ACCREDITATION SYSTEM INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds PSYCHOLOGICAL CLINICAL SCIENCE ACCREDITATION SYSTEM INC?
PSYCHOLOGICAL CLINICAL SCIENCE ACCREDITATION SYSTEM INC (Indiana) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $75,000 to it, the largest being WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ($60,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does PSYCHOLOGICAL CLINICAL SCIENCE ACCREDITATION SYSTEM INC have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $75,000 in grants to PSYCHOLOGICAL CLINICAL SCIENCE ACCREDITATION SYSTEM INC, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of PSYCHOLOGICAL CLINICAL SCIENCE ACCREDITATION SYSTEM INC?
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY is the largest funder on record, with $60,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like PSYCHOLOGICAL CLINICAL SCIENCE ACCREDITATION SYSTEM INC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Indiana. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Psychological Clinical Science Accreditation System →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 2 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing