How much did CORNELIA T BAILEY CHARITABLE TRUST grant in FY2022?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 93% of CORNELIA T BAILEY CHARITABLE TRUST’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

museum artpalm beachesart museumchildguildsave musicpbs south

2020

covid reliefgirls creativecreative writingcollaborativesat preparationsat actact prep

2021

veteransdogfood bankexperienceafterschool artseducation engagementlearning arts

2022

act satworkshopstransfer securitiessecurities cashteacherperformancerising

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2022 · 105 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

Under $10k2 grants · $10k
$10k–50k81 grants · $1.9M
$50k–250k8 grants · $918k
$250k+14 grants · $485M

$25,000

Median grant

States reached

Total assets

Largest grants

CORNELIA T BAILEY CHARITABLE TRUST$243,622,453
GLEN W BAILEY CHARITABLE TRUST$234,979,115
NORTON MUSEUM$1,000,000
PALM BEACH OPERA$1,000,000
BUSCH WILDLIFE SANCTUARY$1,000,000
WELLESLEY COLLEGE$500,000
RAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS$500,000
LIGHTHOUSE ARTCENTER$500,000
HOBE SOUND COMMUNITY CHEST$450,000
YWCA OF PALM BEACH COUNTY$402,500
LOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER$400,000
NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION$300,000
METROPOLITAN OPERA LINCOLN CENTER$250,000
JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$250,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY THE$243,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 11%. 56% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

8%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$42M · 124 repeat orgs$495M to everyone else

124 repeat relationships — 56 still active in FY2022, 68 since wound down; 49 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

124

229

Total granted

$42M

$15M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%

+39%

Still filing today

72%

57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 2% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $480M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

MJ
MALTZ JUPITER THEATRE
3× · 2017–2020 · $4.5M · revenue +55% · 30% of their budget
PB
PALM BEACH OPERA
5× · 2017–2022 · $4.3M · revenue +17% · 31% of their budget
CF
CENTER FOR CREATIVE EDUCATION
3× · 2017–2020 · $2.1M · revenue +103% · 88% of their budget

Funded once

PS
PBS SOUTH FLORIDA
one grant, 2020 · $2.3M
JI
JUPITER ISLAND ARTS COUNCILgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $1.0M · revenue +10457% · 97% of their budget
CR
CORAL RESTORATION FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $1.0M · revenue +312%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

The Bronx Council On the Arts

A pioneering advocate for cultural equity, the bronx council on the arts nurtures the development of diverse artists and arts organizations and builds strong cultural connections in and beyond the bronx.

Arts & Culture

The Brooklyn Institute of Arts

Bring people together through art & experiences that inspire celebration, compassion & courage.

Arts & Culture

New Museum of Contemporary Art

A center for exhibitions, information, and documentation about living artists since 1977, which continues to be a place of experimentation and a hub of new art and new ideas.

Arts & Culture

New York Foundation for the Arts Inc

To empower artists at critical stages in their creative lives

Arts & Culture

En Garde Arts Inc

To produce bold theatre experiences that reach across artistic, physical and social boundries. We aim to increase empathy and open-mindedness by illuminating nuanced perspectives and unspoken truths behind the salient issues of our time.…

Arts & Culture

Chicago Opera Theater

Chicago opera theater expands the tradition of opera as a living art form by engaging lovers of music and storytelling through innovative experiences, predominantly of new and rarely performed works.

Arts & Culture

The Wharton Institute for the Performing

Wharton arts is new jersey's largest non-profit performing arts education organization serving nearly 2,000 students of all ages, backgrounds, and abilities through a range of classes and ensembles. comprised of new jersey youth symphony,…

—

New York School of the Arts Inc

New york school of the arts, inc. is a school offering courses and specialized workshops in painting, drawing, sculpture, printmaking,art theory and other subjects.

Education

The University of the Arts

Advancing human creativity by educating interdisciplinary artists, performers, makers, & writers.

Education

Philadelphia Performing Arts

To educate each child according to age and development, so that learning and growth are united; to integrate the developing mind and body of the child with academics and the performing arts to ensure each child's excellence in core and…

Education

Museum of Contemporary Art Inc

The mission of the musuem of contemporary art is to contemporary art accesible to diverse audiences - especially underserved populations through the collection, preservation and exhibition of the best of contemporary art and its art…

Arts & Culture

New York Academy of Art

The new york academy of art is a unique graduate school that combines intensive technical training in the fine arts with active critical discourse. we believe that rigorously trained artists are best able to realize their artistic vision.…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community-Word Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bardavon 1869 Opera House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.8%2/263

the rest of the field

14%

14,580/102,781

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

259 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

255/259

Grantees still filing

208/259

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$503,652,224Arts & Culture$22,055,760Education$3,539,400Philanthropy$2,263,740Animals$2,150,000Science & Tech$1,815,600Environment$1,290,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cornelia T Bailey Charitable TrustFL188.2× affinity93 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cornelia T Bailey Charitable Trust · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The Batchelor Foundation Inc · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc · The Howard Gilman Foundation Inc · Glenn W Bailey Charitable Trust · The Frederick a Deluca Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for Palm Beach And · The New York Community Trust · Booth Ferris Foundation Xxxxx4008 · Td Charitable Foundation · The Cowles Charitable Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation CORNELIA T BAILEY CHARITABLE TRUST funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

20get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: JUPITER ISLAND ARTS COUNCIL.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~14 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 105.6× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 825050450 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on JUPITER ISLAND ARTS COUNCIL, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 14 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 97% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Cornelia T Bailey Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Cornelia T Bailey Charitable Trust through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

CORNELIA T BAILEY CHARITABLE TRUST

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

259 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Cornelia T Bailey Charitable Trust?

More from the funding graph

CORNELIA T BAILEY CHARITABLE TRUST

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

259 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Cornelia T Bailey Charitable Trust?

More from the funding graph