· Public charity
Colorado Dental Service Inc
Colorado dental services (dba delta dental of colorado) was formed as a 501(c)(4) organization in order to improve the oral health of the communities it serves.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2020.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 32 grants below total $4,259,908 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,411,766 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $151,858 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2020
- Under $10k4 grants · $28k
- $10k–50k25 grants · $349k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $133k
- $250k+1 grant · $3.8M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DELTA DENTAL OF COLORADO FOUNDATION | $3,750,000 |
| AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION | $75,000 |
| MILE HIGH UNITED WAY | $58,150 |
| SMILEMAKERS INC | $20,816 |
| FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES | $20,200 |
| METRO CARING | $20,150 |
| COLORADO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS | $20,000 |
| BROTHER JEFF'S CULTURAL CENTER | $20,000 |
| NAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS | $20,000 |
| NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION INC | $17,000 |
| CARE AND SHARE INC | $15,263 |
| DENVER RESCUE MISSION | $15,258 |
| DENVER PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATN | $15,050 |
| VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA | $15,000 |
| CRAIG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $14,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $177k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 70% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 16% of Colorado Dental Service Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in CO; read by stated purpose it is 83% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.
46 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2020, 31 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2020, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $226k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AHAmerican Heart Association Inc4× · 2017–2020 · $235k · revenue +33%
- CCCOLORADO CHILDREN'S CAMPAIGN4× · 2017–2020 · $192k · revenue +55%
- LCLA CLINICA TEPEYAC3× · 2017–2019 · $173k · revenue +286%
Funded once
- SDSPRINGROCK DENTAL INCone grant, 2017 · $650k · revenue -26% · 64% of their budget
- TCTHE COLORADO MISSION OF MERCYgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +201%
American Diabetes Associationone grant, 2019 · $18k · revenue +4%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…
We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.
The mission of the Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation is to promote the health and well-being of physicians and physician assistants through evaluation, treatment referral, support education and research.
To equip partners and communities in colorado and across the nation with the resources, services and unbiased data needed to improve health and health care. we help communities, organizations and individuals identify opportunities to…
Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.
To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.
Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.
Prime health advances health justice, equity, access quality and cost through innovation, collaboration, and community building.
To advance the science of jurisprudence, secure the more efficient administration of justice, encourage the adoption of proper legislation, advocate thorough and continuing legal education, uphold the honor and integrity of the bar,…
Partnering to improve quality of life as a nonprofit organization dedicated to mental health and wellness. healing is our purpose, help is our promise, health is our passion.
Promote the general interest of daily, weekly, and monthly newspapers and online publications, improve editorials and business methods of daily and weekly newspapers, and advance those newspapers' usefulness and influence in the public…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado Coalition for the Homeless and the most unlike its peers is Ima Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
118 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 118 of the 124 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF COLORADO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SPRINGROCK DENTAL INC ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds COLORADO CHILDREN'S CAMPAIGN ↗
- Who funds LA CLINICA TEPEYAC ↗
- Who funds MILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR HEALTH PROGRESS ↗
- Who funds DENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Craig Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds FLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES OF COLORADO ↗
- Who funds DENTAL LIFELINE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds National Kidney Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PROJECT WORTHMORE ↗
- Who funds METRO CARING ↗
- Who funds THE WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO INC ↗
- Who funds Colorado Succeeds ↗
- Who funds Food For Thought Denver ↗
- Who funds Care and Share Inc ↗
- Who funds Oral Health Colorado ↗
- Who funds COLORADO WOMENS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds DENVER METRO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Transplant Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds GREATER COLORADO COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds A PRECIOUS CHILD INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS IN COLORADO INC ↗
- Who funds DENVER POST COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FOOTHILLS ART CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE COLORADO MISSION OF MERCY ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗
- Who funds NAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC ↗
- Who funds BROTHER JEFF'S CULTURAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds Colorado Coalition for the Homeless ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · The Denver Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · The Colorado Trust · Caring for Colorado Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Boettcher Foundation · Delta Dental Plan of Colorado Foundation Inc · Temple Hoyne Buell Foundation · Daniels Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Colorado Dental Service Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.