Skip to content
Plinth
← FundingAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

Kansas · Nonprofit

IMA FOUNDATION

IMA FOUNDATION (Kansas) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $61,800 to it, the largest being ONEBEACON CHARITABLE TRUST ($26,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$2.0M
Revenue FY2025
7
Funders on record
$62k
Grants received
$11M
Net assets
3/7 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 1%

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2021, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2021, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20212021 Revenue 100 ($1.2M) Expenses 100 ($556k) Net assets 100 ($7.0M)2022 Revenue 151 ($1.8M) Expenses 245 ($1.4M) Net assets 106 ($7.4M)2023 Revenue 188 ($2.2M) Expenses 276 ($1.5M) Net assets 117 ($8.1M)2024 Revenue 375 ($4.5M) Expenses 416 ($2.3M) Net assets 137 ($9.6M)2025 Revenue 167 ($2.0M) Expenses 252 ($1.4M) Net assets 158 ($11M)
20212022202320242025
Revenue (167)Expenses (252)Net assets (158)
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income rose $200 → $10k.

From the IRS filings of IMA FOUNDATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

IMA FOUNDATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 42% of grant income and the top three 78%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

42% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund IMA FOUNDATION.

42%
largest funder
78%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 95% · 2020 100% · 2021 43% · 2022 77% · 2023 83%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

IMA FOUNDATION draws 99% of its grant income from funders outside Kansas, across 6 states in all.

MN
MI
IA
UT
CO
KS

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Kansas out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 7 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like IMA FOUNDATION

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Kansas

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for IMA FOUNDATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds IMA FOUNDATION?
IMA FOUNDATION (Kansas) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $61,800 to it, the largest being ONEBEACON CHARITABLE TRUST ($26,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does IMA FOUNDATION have?
IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $61,800 in grants to IMA FOUNDATION, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of IMA FOUNDATION?
ONEBEACON CHARITABLE TRUST is the largest funder on record, with $26,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like IMA FOUNDATION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Kansas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2021–2025), and the filings of 7funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing