Skip to content
Colleyville Woman's Club at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Colleyville Woman's Club

To enhance the community through education, charitable fundraising, volunteer service and other membership activities.

$189k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$267kInternational$196kFood & Nutrition$107kHealth$31kRecreation & Sports$26kCrime & Legal$21kYouth Development$11kCivil Rights$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 17 grants below total $160,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $189,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $29,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $124k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$352k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
METROPORT MEALS ON WHEELS$20,000
VICTORY THERAPY CENTER$16,000
NORTH TEXAS SNAP$15,000
KIDS MATTER$13,000
THE COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER$10,000
SERVING OUR SENIORS$10,000
WOMENS CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY$10,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$10,000
THE WARM PLACE$10,000
CAMP SUMMIT$10,000
SUMMER SANTA$6,000
GRACE$5,000
ME SQUARED$5,000
CANCER CARE SERVICES$5,000
ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $289k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $15k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $7k → 11%GRACE: $20k → 11%NORTH TEXAS SNAP: $15k → 11%GRACE: $10k → 11%GRACE: $10k → 11%NORTH TEXAS SNAP: $10k → 11%GRACE: $5k → 11%NORTH TEXAS SNAP: $5k → 11%THE WARM PLACE: $10k → 11%THE WARM PLACE: $10k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF FW: $7k → 11%6 STONES MISSION NETWORK: $5k → 11%SERVING OUR SENIORS: $6k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FW: $5k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $15k → 11%THE WARM PLACE: $5k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT CTY: $8k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $25k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $20k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT CTY: $15k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT CTY: $14k → 11%COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER: $10k → 11%THE COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER: $10k → 11%COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER: $8k → 11%COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER: $5k → 11%EMPATHY HQ: $5k → 11%THE WARM PLACE: $5k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$609k · 15 repeat orgs$69k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against -13% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
4

Total granted

$609k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
-13%

Still filing today

100%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCivil RightsYouth DevelopmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    METROPORT MEALS ON WHEELS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $144k · revenue +96%
  • SO
    SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $119k · revenue +52%
  • GR
    GRAPEVINE RELIEF AND COMMUNITY EXCHANGE
    6× · 2017–2025 · $63k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • 6S
    6 STONES MISSION NETWORKgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +28%
  • CP
    COLLEYVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -78%
  • IC
    I CAN STILL SHINE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue -13%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Crisis Assistance Center Inc dba Community Assistance Center

To provide emergency assistance to people in Montgomery County, TX who are in an unexpected crisis.

Human Services
2
Texas Community Counseling

When care is within reach, lives change. Texas Community Counseling is a faith-based nonprofit committed to bringing hope and healing through mental health care to the communities that need it the most. We empower individuals to heal,…

Human Services
3
Cancer Support Community North Texas

Cancer support community north texas is a non-profit organization that provides one of the most comprehensive, free of charge programs providing cancer support available in dallas, collin and tarrant counties.

Health
4
Trauma Support Services of North Texas

The mission of Trauma Support Services is to provide healing and resilience for individuals and communities affected by trauma through accessible mental health therapy and trauma-informed education.

Public Safety & Disaster
5
Eastland County Crisis Center Inc

To provide services designed to meet the physical, social, and emotional needs of domestic violence and sexual assault victims by providing for immediate, short, and long-term needs.

Human Services
6
Dallas Area Rape Crisis Center

To engage and educate communities to prevent sexual violence and to support survivors and their loved ones as they heal and thrive.

Human Services
7
Katy Christian Ministries

See Schedule O.Katy Christian Ministries (KCM) is a social service non-profit that serves the Katy/West Houston area. KCM's Social Service Department offers emergency financial assistance, a Food Pantry, a Crisis Center that houses the…

Human Services
8
Safe City Commission

Support law enforcement and promote public safety awareness and crime prevention in Fort Worth.

Crime & Legal
9
Montgomery County Childrens Advocacy Center Inc

Serves abused children through a comprehensive approach to services for abused children and their families.

Crime & Legal
10
Childrens Advocacy Center of West Texas Inc

The Organizations mission is to bring unity and efficiency to investigations of child abuse through the use of a multi-disciplinary team and, thereby, to provide the best possible services to victims of child abuse and their families.

Crime & Legal
11
The Dallas County System of Services Inc

To unify services across Dallas County, to empower youth, strengthen families and build safe, healthy communities.

Human Services
12
Shelter Agencies for Families in East Texas

To provide shelter to abused families.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa of Tarrant County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Colleyville Public Library Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
13/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $118,500 · Human ServicesSAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTYGRAPEVINE RELIEF AND COMMUNITY EXCHANGE: $62,500 · Human ServicesGRAPEVINE RELIEF AND COMMUNITY EXCHANGECOMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $59,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INCNORTH TEXAS SNAP INC: $36,000 · Human ServicesNORTH TEXAS SNAP INCSERVING OUR SENIORS INC: $13,500 · Human Services+4 more: $30,000 · Human Services+4 moreMETROPORT MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $143,500 · OtherMETROPORT MEALS ON WHEELS INCRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF FORT WORTH INC: $20,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF FORT WORT…MID-CITIES CARE CORPS: $17,500 · OtherMID-CITIES CARE CORPSKIDS MATTER: $13,000 · OtherKIDS MATTER+2 more: $10,000 · OtherTHE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY INC: $30,000 · HealthTHE WOMEN'S …VICTORY THERAPEUTIC CENTER INC: $16,000 · HealthVICTORY THER…CANCER CARE SERVICES: $15,000 · HealthCANCER CARE …SUMMER SANTA: $11,000 · HealthSUMMER SANTAMe Squared Cancer Foundation: $5,000 · HealthMe Squared C…CAMP SUMMIT INC: $36,000 · Youth DevelopmentCASA OF TARRANT COUNTY INC: $21,000 · Civil RightsALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN INC: $15,000 · Civil RightsCOLLEYVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Education
Human Services$320,000Other$204,000Health$77,000Youth Development$36,000Civil Rights$36,000Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMETROPORT MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $143,500 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetSAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $118,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetGRAPEVINE RELIEF AND COMMUNITY EXCHANGE: $62,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $59,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH TEXAS SNAP INC: $36,000 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetCAMP SUMMIT INC: $36,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY INC: $30,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCASA OF TARRANT COUNTY INC: $21,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF FORT WORTH INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMID-CITIES CARE CORPS: $17,500 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCANCER CARE SERVICES: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSERVING OUR SENIORS INC: $13,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSUMMER SANTA: $11,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetWHAT ABOUT REMEMBERING ME CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget6 STONES MISSION NETWORK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOLLEYVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetI CAN STILL SHINE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundatio…Textron Charitable Tr…Greater Keller Womens…Thomas M Helen McKee …Bnsf Railway Foundati…Community Foundation …Southlake Women's Clu…Sid W Richardson Foun…United Way of Tarrant…Slocum Family Foundat…Amon G Carter Foundat…America's Charities
Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX34.2× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Greater Keller Womens Club Foundation Inc · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Southlake Women's Club Foundation · Sid W Richardson Foundation · United Way of Tarrant County · Slocum Family Foundation · Amon G Carter Foundation · America's Charities

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Colleyville Woman's Club funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Colleyville Woman's Club. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Colleyville Woman's Club?

    Find your warmest path to Colleyville Woman's Club through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Colleyville Woman's Club’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home