· Public charity
Colleyville Woman's Club
To enhance the community through education, charitable fundraising, volunteer service and other membership activities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 17 grants below total $160,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $189,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $29,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $36k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $124k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| METROPORT MEALS ON WHEELS | $20,000 |
| VICTORY THERAPY CENTER | $16,000 |
| NORTH TEXAS SNAP | $15,000 |
| KIDS MATTER | $13,000 |
| THE WARM PLACE | $10,000 |
| THE COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER | $10,000 |
| SERVING OUR SENIORS | $10,000 |
| WOMENS CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY | $10,000 |
| CAMP SUMMIT | $10,000 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE | $10,000 |
| SUMMER SANTA | $6,000 |
| ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN | $5,000 |
| EMPATHY HQ | $5,000 |
| GRACE | $5,000 |
| ME SQUARED | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $289k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against -13% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MMMETROPORT MEALS ON WHEELS INC9× · 2017–2025 · $144k · revenue +96%
- SOSAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY8× · 2017–2024 · $119k · revenue +39%
- GRGRAPEVINE RELIEF AND COMMUNITY EXCHANGE6× · 2017–2025 · $63k · revenue +77%
Funded once
- CPCOLLEYVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -78%
- TCTHE COLLEYVILLE CENTERone grant, 2023 · $5k
- ICI CAN STILL SHINE INCone grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue -13%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide emergency assistance to people in Montgomery County, TX who are in an unexpected crisis.
When care is within reach, lives change. Texas Community Counseling is a faith-based nonprofit committed to bringing hope and healing through mental health care to the communities that need it the most. We empower individuals to heal,…
Cancer support community north texas is a non-profit organization that provides one of the most comprehensive, free of charge programs providing cancer support available in dallas, collin and tarrant counties.
The mission of Trauma Support Services is to provide healing and resilience for individuals and communities affected by trauma through accessible mental health therapy and trauma-informed education.
To provide services designed to meet the physical, social, and emotional needs of domestic violence and sexual assault victims by providing for immediate, short, and long-term needs.
To engage and educate communities to prevent sexual violence and to support survivors and their loved ones as they heal and thrive.
See Schedule O.Katy Christian Ministries (KCM) is a social service non-profit that serves the Katy/West Houston area. KCM's Social Service Department offers emergency financial assistance, a Food Pantry, a Crisis Center that houses the…
Support law enforcement and promote public safety awareness and crime prevention in Fort Worth.
Serves abused children through a comprehensive approach to services for abused children and their families.
The Organizations mission is to bring unity and efficiency to investigations of child abuse through the use of a multi-disciplinary team and, thereby, to provide the best possible services to victims of child abuse and their families.
To unify services across Dallas County, to empower youth, strengthen families and build safe, healthy communities.
To provide shelter to abused families.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa of Tarrant County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Colleyville Public Library Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds METROPORT MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
- Who funds SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY ↗
- Who funds GRAPEVINE RELIEF AND COMMUNITY EXCHANGE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP SUMMIT INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH TEXAS SNAP INC ↗
- Who funds THE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds CASA OF TARRANT COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF FORT WORTH INC ↗
- Who funds MID-CITIES CARE CORPS ↗
- Who funds VICTORY THERAPEUTIC CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CANCER CARE SERVICES ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds SERVING OUR SENIORS INC ↗
- Who funds SUMMER SANTA ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH ↗
- Who funds WHAT ABOUT REMEMBERING ME CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds COLLEYVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Me Squared Cancer Foundation ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE CHILD & FAMILY SOLUTIONS ↗
- Who funds I CAN STILL SHINE INC ↗
- Who funds 6 STONES MISSION NETWORK ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Greater Keller Womens Club Foundation Inc · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Southlake Women's Club Foundation · Sid W Richardson Foundation · United Way of Tarrant County · Slocum Family Foundation · Amon G Carter Foundation · America's Charities
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Colleyville Woman's Club funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Colleyville Woman's Club?
Find your warmest path to Colleyville Woman's Club through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.