How much did SOUTHLAKE WOMEN'S CLUB FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 65% of SOUTHLAKE WOMEN'S CLUB FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$6,200

Median grant

—

States reached

$207k

Total assets

Largest grants

CARROLL MIDDLE SCHOOL$6,200
EUBANKS INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL$6,200
DURHAM INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL$6,200
WALNUT GROVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$6,200
OLD UNION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$6,200
DAWSON MIDDLE SCHOOL$6,200
CARROLL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$6,200
JOHNSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$6,200

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–19, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$360k · 19 repeat orgs$90k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$360k

$90k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%

+61%

Still filing today

58%

83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthEducationRecreation & SportsArts & CultureInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SS
Summer Santa Inc
2× · 2018–2019 · $20k · revenue +40%
IC
I Can Still Shine
2× · 2018–2019 · $19k · revenue +122%
BW
Battered Womens Foundation
2× · 2018–2019 · $19k · revenue +174%

Funded once

MC
MISC CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS
one grant, 2020 · $18k
TA
Tarrant Area Food Bankgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +54%
CE
Community Enrichment Centergraduated
one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +61%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Crisis Center of West Texas

Crisis center of west texas provides services to individuals affected by domestic and sexual violence. we provide shelter, counseling and advocacy to help build lives free from violence. we seek social change to end domestic and sexual…

—

Crisis Assistance Center Inc

To provide emergency assistance to people in Montgomery County, TX who are in an unexpected crisis.

Human Services

Trauma Support Services of North Texas

Trauma Support Services provides support for those who have experienced trauma and victims of crime. It provides programming essential to the community and trauma survivors.

Public Safety & Disaster

Christmas Wish Project of Tarrant County

To purchase items/toys for foster kids in our community. Our expenditures were $64240.00 this year.

Human Services

Cancer Support Community North Texas

Cancer support community north texas is a non-profit organization that provides one of the most comprehensive, free of charge programs providing cancer support available in dallas, collin and tarrant counties.

Health

Texas Community Counseling

To Bring hopeand healing through mental health care to the comnmunities that need it the most.

Human Services

Court Appointed Special Advocates of North Texas Inc

To provide court appointed volunteers who serve as advocates and help abused children obtain safe permanent home placements

—

Montgomery County Childrens Advocacy Center Inc

Serves abused children through a comprehensive approach to services for abused children and their families.

Crime & Legal

Texans Care for Children Inc

Texas Care for Children shapes public policies and brings Texans together to make children a statewide priority. We work so kids can have what they need to be healthy, secure, and thriving and so every Texan can have the best start to life.

Crime & Legal

Lake Travis Crisis Ministries

Meet the shortterm needs of people in crisis situations by providing immediate help in the form of food financial assistance

Human Services

Eastland County Crisis Center Inc

To provide services designed to meet the physical, social, and emotional needs of domestic violence and sexual assault victims by providing for immediate, short, and long-term needs.

Human Services

Court Appointed Special Advocates of Milam County

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa of Tarrant County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Grapevine Relief and Community Exchange. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

21/21

Grantees still filing

17/21

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$301,525Health$59,000Human Services$41,000Recreation & Sports$15,445Education$15,000Arts & Culture$10,000International$7,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX38.7× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Greater Keller Womens Club Foundation Inc · Colleyville Woman's Club · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Slocum Family Foundation · The Alcon Foundation Inc · United Way of Tarrant County · America's Charities · Fort Worth Colonial Charities Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation SOUTHLAKE WOMEN'S CLUB FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Families for Effective Autism Treat.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 752598570 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Families for Effective Autism Treat, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 24% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Southlake Women's Club Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Southlake Women's Club Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

SOUTHLAKE WOMEN'S CLUB FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Southlake Women's Club Foundation?

More from the funding graph

SOUTHLAKE WOMEN'S CLUB FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Southlake Women's Club Foundation?

More from the funding graph