Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Southlake Women's Club Foundation

To raise funds to benefit local charities.

$51k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Education$185kHuman Services$124kHealth$73kFood & Nutrition$61kCrime & Legal$34kYouth Development$30kPhilanthropy$18kRecreation & Sports$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 8 grants below total $49,600 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $50,900 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,300 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$6,200
Median grant
—
States reached
$207k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JOHNSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$6,200
CARROLL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$6,200
CARROLL MIDDLE SCHOOL$6,200
WALNUT GROVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$6,200
DAWSON MIDDLE SCHOOL$6,200
DURHAM INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL$6,200
OLD UNION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$6,200
EUBANKS INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL$6,200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $66k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Amys Wish With Wings: $5k → 11%GRACE: $9k → 11%Grapevine Relief & Comm Exchange: $9k → 11%Safe Haven of Tarrant County: $8k → 11%What About Remembering Me Center: $5k → 11%Safe Haven of Tarrant County: $5k → 11%Community Enrichment Center: $10k → 11%Community Enrichment Center: $9k → 11%Safe Haven of Tarrant County: $7k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$490k · 22 repeat orgs$72k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
11

Total granted

$490k
$72k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+60%

Still filing today

64%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationRecreation & SportsArts & CultureInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    SUMMER SANTA
    3× · 2017–2019 · $30k · revenue +40%
  • WO
    Wings of a Butterfly
    3× · 2017–2019 · $29k · revenue +174%
  • MM
    METROPORT MEALS ON WHEELS INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $28k · revenue +96%

Funded once

  • MC
    MISC CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS
    one grant, 2020 · $18k
  • KM
    KIDS MATTER INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2018 · $8k · revenue +15%
  • DI
    DUNHAM INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $6k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Community Counseling

When care is within reach, lives change. Texas Community Counseling is a faith-based nonprofit committed to bringing hope and healing through mental health care to the communities that need it the most. We empower individuals to heal,…

Human Services
2
Texas Battered Women's Center Inc

Provide care, assistance, and counseling for abused women. Provide food for needy families.

Human Services
3
Shelter Agencies for Families in East Texas

To provide shelter to abused families.

Human Services
4
Dfw Cares for Kids

Provide donated items to families

Community Improvement
5
Sunny Glen Children's Home Inc

Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.

Human Services
6
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Milam County
—
7
Trauma Support Services of North Texas

The mission of Trauma Support Services is to provide healing and resilience for individuals and communities affected by trauma through accessible mental health therapy and trauma-informed education.

Public Safety & Disaster
8
Northeast Texas Child Advocacy Center Inc

To bring hope and healing while working together to break the cycle of child abuse.

Human Services
9
Your Harvest House

Harvest House exists to restore hope and dignity by equipping families to overcome crisis and build long-term stability. We do this by pairing practical resources with relational support and spiritual encouragement, so help becomes lasting…

—
10
Bread for Our Children

Provide nutrition meals for communities in the Dallas/Ft Worth, Texas areas

—
11
Cancer Support Community North Texas

Cancer support community north texas is a non-profit organization that provides one of the most comprehensive, free of charge programs providing cancer support available in dallas, collin and tarrant counties.

Health
12
The Warren Center Inc

Every day, The Warren Center provides professional evaluations, therapy services and support to children and families impacted with developmental delays and disabilities. Advocating, serving and empowering our clients has been at the heart…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa of Tarrant County Inc and the most unlike its peers is I Can Still Shine Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
19/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CARROLL MIDDLE SCHOOL — $58,300 · OtherCARROLL MIDDLE SCHOOLWings of a Butterfly — $28,500 · OtherWings of a ButterflyMETROPORT MEALS ON WHEELS INC — $27,500 · OtherMETROPORT MEALS ON WHEELS INCCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY STOREHOUSE INC — $27,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY STOREHOUSE INCI CAN STILL SHINE INC — $26,500 · OtherI CAN STILL SHINE INCOLD UNION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL — $18,100 · OtherJOHNSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL — $18,100 · OtherCARROLL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL — $18,100 · OtherDAWSON MIDDLE SCHOOL — $18,100 · OtherEUBANKS INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL — $18,100 · OtherWALNUT GROVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL — $18,100 · OtherMISC CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS — $18,000 · OtherMID CITIES CHRISTMAS PROVIDERS — $15,000 · OtherDURHAM INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL — $12,450 · Other+4 more — $20,675 · Other+4 moreFAMILIES FOR EFFECTIVE AUTISM TREATMENT - NORTH TEXAS — $31,000 · HealthFAMILIES FOR EFFEC…SUMMER SANTA — $30,000 · HealthSUMMER SANTACANCER CARE SERVICES — $26,000 · HealthCANCER CARE SERVIC…Texas Health Resources Foundation — $5,500 · HealthTexas Health Resou…SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY — $19,250 · Human ServicesSAFEHAVEN OF T…COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC — $19,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ENRI…GRAPEVINE RELIEF AND COMMUNITY EXCHANGE — $17,500 · Human ServicesGRAPEVINE RELI…AMY'S WISH WITH WINGS — $5,000 · Human ServicesAMY'S WISH WIT…WHAT ABOUT REMEMBERING ME CENTER INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesWHAT ABOUT REM…NORTH TEXAS SNAP INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesNORTH TEXAS SN…Carroll Education Foundation Inc — $18,000 · EducationGILL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC — $5,000 · EducationMIRACLE LEAGUE OF SOUTHLAKE — $15,445 · Recreation & SportsArts Council of Northeast Tarrant County — $10,000 · Arts & CultureKIDS MATTER INTERNATIONAL — $7,500 · International
Other$342,525Health$92,500Human Services$70,750Education$23,000Recreation & Sports$15,445Arts & Culture$10,000International$7,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFAMILIES FOR EFFECTIVE AUTISM TREATMENT - NORTH TEXAS — $31,000 over 3y, 24% of budgetSUMMER SANTA — $30,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetMETROPORT MEALS ON WHEELS INC — $27,500 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY STOREHOUSE INC — $27,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetI CAN STILL SHINE INC — $26,500 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetCANCER CARE SERVICES — $26,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY — $19,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC — $19,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCarroll Education Foundation Inc — $18,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetGRAPEVINE RELIEF AND COMMUNITY EXCHANGE — $17,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMIRACLE LEAGUE OF SOUTHLAKE — $15,445 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetArts Council of Northeast Tarrant County — $10,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetKIDS MATTER INTERNATIONAL — $7,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTexas Health Resources Foundation — $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASA OF TARRANT COUNTY INC — $5,025 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMY'S WISH WITH WINGS — $5,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetPROJECTHANDUP — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGILL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE LADDER ALLIANCE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetWHAT ABOUT REMEMBERING ME CENTER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNORTH TEXAS SNAP INC — $5,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundatio…Bnsf Railway Foundati…Textron Charitable Tr…Greater Keller Womens…Colleyville Woman's C…Sid W Richardson Foun…Thomas M Helen McKee …Community Foundation …Slocum Family Foundat…The Alcon Foundation …Amon G Carter Foundat…United Way of Tarrant…
Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX41.5× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Greater Keller Womens Club Foundation Inc · Colleyville Woman's Club · Sid W Richardson Foundation · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Slocum Family Foundation · The Alcon Foundation Inc · Amon G Carter Foundation · United Way of Tarrant County

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Southlake Women's Club Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Southlake Women's Club Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Southlake Women's Club Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines