· Public charity
Greater Keller Womens Club Foundation Inc
Charitable Community Aid
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 12 grants below total $108,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $251,512 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $143,512 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $39k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $69k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Victory Therapeutic Center Inc | $17,000 |
| Neuro Assistance Foundation | $17,000 |
| Safehaven of Tarrant County | $15,000 |
| Metroport Meals on Wheels Inc | $10,000 |
| Christs Haven for Children | $10,000 |
| Keller Community Senior Fund | $8,000 |
| I Can Still Shine Program | $6,000 |
| Warm Foundation Inc dba The WARM Pl | $5,000 |
| Gill Children Services Inc | $5,000 |
| Community Enrichment Center | $5,000 |
| North Texas SNAP | $5,000 |
| Ronald McDonald House of Fort Worth | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $108k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NANEURO ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION6× · 2018–2024 · $100k · revenue +218%
- CHChrist's Haven for Children Inc6× · 2018–2024 · $59k · revenue +67%
- SOSAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY4× · 2020–2024 · $54k · revenue +28%
Funded once
- JPJUNIOR PLAYERS GUILD3× · 2022–2024 · $14k · revenue -27%
- MSMe Squared Cancer Foundation3× · 2022–2024 · $12k · revenue -34%
- SSStepping Stones Foundationgraduated3× · 2022–2024 · $10k · revenue +55%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
See Schedule O.Katy Christian Ministries (KCM) is a social service non-profit that serves the Katy/West Houston area. KCM's Social Service Department offers emergency financial assistance, a Food Pantry, a Crisis Center that houses the…
Respite Care of San Antonio is dedicated to providing specialized care for children with special needs and complex medical conditions through a General Residential Operation (GRO), Developmental Childcare Center, and Community Programs for…
CASA of Williamson County, TX exists to empower community volunteers to advocate for children who have experienced abuse or neglect to find loving, safe, and permanent homes.
To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.
Fort Bend County Child Advocates, Inc. provides a voice, heals the hurt and breaks the cycle of abuse and neglect for children in Fort Bend County.
The mission of Trauma Support Services is to provide healing and resilience for individuals and communities affected by trauma through accessible mental health therapy and trauma-informed education.
The mission of STARR of Hope, in collaboration with the community resources, is to provide prevention, intervention, and advocacy for women and children who experience domestic abuse or violence in Starr, Zapata and Jim Hogg Counties.
To provide emergency assistance to people in Montgomery County, TX who are in an unexpected crisis.
Child Advocacy
Serves abused children through a comprehensive approach to services for abused children and their families.
Comprehensive service to domestic violence and sexual assault victims
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa of Tarrant County Inc and the most unlike its peers is I Can Still Shine Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds VICTORY THERAPEUTIC CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NEURO ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Christ's Haven for Children Inc ↗
- Who funds SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY ↗
- Who funds METROPORT MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
- Who funds Wings of a Butterfly ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds GILL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds WARM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds I CAN STILL SHINE INC ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR PLAYERS GUILD ↗
- Who funds MID-CITIES CARE CORPS ↗
- Who funds Me Squared Cancer Foundation ↗
- Who funds SUMMER SANTA ↗
- Who funds Stepping Stones Foundation ↗
- Who funds NORTH TEXAS SNAP INC ↗
- Who funds CASA OF TARRANT COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF FORT WORTH INC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY STOREHOUSE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Colleyville Woman's Club · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Southlake Women's Club Foundation · Ken W Davis Foundation · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Amon G Carter Foundation · Slocum Family Foundation · Coserv Charitable Foundation · Sid W Richardson Foundation · The Rees-Jones Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Greater Keller Womens Club Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Greater Keller Womens Club Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Greater Keller Womens Club Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.