· Private foundation
Clapp G H Decd Char and Ed Tr
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k33 grants · $176k
- $10k–50k65 grants · $825k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| READ TO THEM | $40,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH | $25,000 |
| CHATHAM UNIVERSITY | $25,000 |
| CARNEGIE MUSEUMS OF PITTSBURGH | $20,000 |
| NATIONAL AVIARY | $15,000 |
| CHILDREN'S HOME OF PITTSBURGH | $15,000 |
| SEWICKLEY PUBLIC LIBRARY | $15,000 |
| WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL FOR BLIND | $15,000 |
| GREATER PGH FOOD BANK | $15,000 |
| WATSON INSTITUTE | $15,000 |
| CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH | $15,000 |
| COMMUNITY HOUSING SOLUTIONS | $15,000 |
| WQED PITTSBURGH | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,000 |
| EARLIERORG | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $374k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
117 repeat relationships — 79 still active in FY2025, 38 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $158k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RSRICHMOND SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS6× · 2020–2025 · $137k · revenue +53%
- MPMISS PORTER'S SCHOOL INC6× · 2020–2025 · $130k · revenue +24%
- ZSZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PITTSBURGH6× · 2020–2025 · $130k · revenue +58%
Funded once
- POPITTSBURGH OPERA INCone grant, 2022 · $312k · revenue -51%
- TCTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIAone grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue +8%
- VCVINCENTIAN COLLABORATIVE SYSTEMone grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue -59%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…
We, pittsburgh mercy health system (pittsburgh mercy) and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. pittsburgh mercy is a member of trinity…
To provide a means for sharing resources and information among members, engage in joint projects, and offer a common voice on educational matters.
The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.
Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.
The mission of upmc western maryland is to serve our community by providing outstanding patient care and to shape tomorrow's health system through clinical & technological innovation, research and education.
Our community-based and controlled health care system exists to improve regional access to a wide array of premier primary care and advanced health services while supporting a reverence for life and the worth and dignity of each individual.
To create and distribute trusted content, build connections and strengthen our community through public media.
Founded in 1827, the pennsylvania horticultural society (phs) uses horticulture to advance the health and well-being of the greater philadelphia region. (continued in sch o)phs's work focuses on four impact priorities: creating healthy…
Gettysburg college is a residential, undergraduate college of the liberal arts and sciences.
The mission of penn highlands mon valley is to enhance the health of the residents of the mid-monongahela valley area by providing outstanding healthcare services.
See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Homeless Children's Education Fund and the most unlike its peers is Best Buddies Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
121 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 121 of the 193 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PITTSBURGH OPERA INC ↗
- Who funds RICHMOND SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds MISS PORTER'S SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds CARNEGIE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds CHATHAM UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds MARY & ALEXANDER LAUGHLIN CHILDREN'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds WQED MULTIMEDIA ↗
- Who funds PITTSBURGH SYMPHONY INC ↗
- Who funds Sewickley Public Library ↗
- Who funds THE WATSON INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds READ TO THEM INC ↗
- Who funds EYE AND EAR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HERITAGE VALLEY HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Union Aid Society ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS FOR AN EARLIER BREAST CANCER TEST INC ↗
- Who funds MOSES H CONE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OPERATING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds NEWARK ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds EXTRA MILE EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Sweetwater Art Center ↗
- Who funds WESTMORELAND MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HOUSING SOLUTIONS OF GUILFORD INC ↗
- Who funds WESTMORELAND COUNTY FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL AVIARY IN PITTSBURGH INC ↗
- Who funds St Andrew's School ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · Richard King Mellon Foundation · The Jack Buncher Foundation · The Grable Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · Eqt Foundation · Snee-Reinhardt Charitable Foundation · The Heinz Endowments · Aj and Sigismunda Palumbo Charitable Trust · Allegheny Foundation · Howard & Nell E Miller Foundat
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Clapp G H Decd Char and Ed Tr funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Avow Hospice Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.