Skip to content

· Private foundation

Centimark Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
172
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$196k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$3.4MReligion$2.0MEducation$1.6MHousing & Shelter$1.5MHealth$1.2MFood & Nutrition$1.1MYouth Development$378kPhilanthropy$274kOther$0
02FY2025 · 172 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k50 grants · $176k
  • $10k–50k117 grants · $1.7M
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $420k
$10,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP$196,000
ASHTABULA DREAM CENTER$60,000
GREATER PGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$58,600
LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR$55,000
WASHINGTON CHRISTIAN OUTREACH$50,000
CITY RESCUE MISSION OF NEW CASTLE$45,000
WASHINGTON CITY MISSION$40,000
Individual grant recipient$36,000
Individual grant recipient$35,000
PITTSBURGH HIRES VETERANS$30,000
SOUTH HILLS INTERFAITH MOVEMENT$30,000
THE PITTSBURGH CONTINGENCY INC$30,000
FOOD HELPERS$26,000
LEMOYNE COMMUNITY CENTER$25,000
NORTH HILLS COMMUNITY OUTREACH$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $2.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BOUNTIFUL BLESSINGS: $10k → 8%BLACKBURN CENTER: $10k → 10%WARRIOR PAWS INC: $14k → 13%BOUNTIFUL BLESSINGS: $10k → 8%BLACKBURN CENTER: $10k → 10%BOUNTIFUL BLESSINGS: $10k → 8%CASA SAN JOSE: $20k → 11%SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 14%SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 14%CASA SAN JOSE: $20k → 11%CASA SAN JOSE: $15k → 11%CASA SAN JOSE: $11k → 11%CASA SAN JOSE: $11k → 11%BEVERLY'S BIRTHDAYS: $13k → 10%BEVERLY'S BIRTHDAYS: $13k → 10%WASHINGTON CITY MISSION: $530k → 12%WASHINGTON CITY MISSION: $40k → 12%WASHINGTON CITY MISSION: $40k → 12%WASHINGTON CITY MISSION: $30k → 12%WASHINGTON CITY MISSION: $30k → 12%WASHINGTON CITY MISSION: $30k → 12%WASHINGTON CITY MISSION: $30k → 12%WASHINGTON CITY MISSION: $26k → 12%LEMOYNE COMMUNITY CENTER: $25k → 12%WASHINGTON CITY MISSION: $25k → 12%LEMOYNE COMMUNITY CENTER: $25k → 12%LEMOYNE COMMUNITY CENTER: $15k → 12%LIGHT OF LIFE RESCUE MISSION: $23k → 11%LIGHT OF LIFE RESCUE MISSION: $23k → 11%LIGHT OF LIFE RESCUE MISSION: $12k → 11%LIGHT OF LIFE RESCUE MISSION: $12k → 11%LIGHT OF LIFE RESCUE MISSION: $12k → 11%LIGHT OF LIFE RESCUE MISSION: $11k → 11%FOOTBRIDGE FOR FAMILIES: $15k → 11%PA WOMEN WORK: $20k → 11%PA WOMEN WORK: $20k → 11%PA WOMEN WORK: $15k → 11%JEREMIAH'S PLACE: $13k → 11%JEREMIAH'S PLACE: $13k → 11%WATSON INSTITUTE: $13k → 11%WATSON INSTITUTE: $13k → 11%PA WOMEN WORK: $12k → 11%MERAKEY ALLEGHENY VALLEY SCHOOL: $20k → 11%MERAKEY ALLEGHENY VALLEY SCHOOL: $20k → 11%MERAKEY ALLEGHENY VALLEY SCHOOL: $15k → 11%HOLY FAMILY INSTITUTE: $13k → 11%HOLY FAMILY INSTITUTE: $13k → 11%JUBILEE ASSOCIATION: $100k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 188 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

188 repeat relationships: 122 still active in FY2025, 66 since wound down; 49 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

188
152

Total granted

$12M
$973k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+26%

Still filing today

48%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $344k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionEducationHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    STOREHOUSE FOR TEACHERS D/B/A THE EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP
    6× · 2020–2025 · $945k · revenue +134%
  • WC
    WASHINGTON CITY MISSION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $781k · revenue +51%
  • WC
    WASHINGTON CHRISTIAN OUTREACH INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $275k · revenue +1% · 27% of their budget

Funded once

  • JA
    JUBILEE ASSOCIATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +99%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PGH FOUND
    one grant, 2023 · $75k
  • SS
    SCHOOL SISTERS ST FRANCIS OF ASSISI
    one grant, 2024 · $70k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Pgh

Catholic charities serves to not only meet the immediate needs of the vulnerable within our communities but to provide solutions that embrace a path to stability for those we are privileged to serve. catholic charities is the primary…

Human Services
2
Mercy Life Center Corporation

We, pittsburgh mercy health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. mercy life center is a member of pittsburgh mercy health system…

Health
3
Bethlehem Haven of Pittsburgh

To provide a continuum of care for homeless individuals that leads toward self-sufficiency.

Human Services
4
Pathways to Housing - Pa

Pathways to housing pa empowers people with disabilities to improve their housing stability, achieve better health, and reclaim their lives.

Housing & Shelter
5
Health Care for the Homeless Inc

Health care for the homeless works to end homelessness through racially equitable health care, housing and advocacy in partnership with those of us who have experienced it.

—
6
Pennsylvania Organization for Women in Early Recovery

See schedule o.power's mission is to help women reclaim their lives from addiction and related emotional health issues and improve the well-being of future generations. we provide a range of gender-responsive, trauma-informed drug and…

Health
7
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Allentown Inc

Catholic charities, diocese of allentown serves as a living expression of christ's love by providing compassionate, professional services, advocacy, and hope to individuals, families, and communities, regardless of faith while respecting…

—
8
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
9
Philabundance

PHILABUNDANCE WAS FOUNDED IN 1984 WITH THE SIMPLE BELIEF THAT NO ONE SHOULD GO HUNGRY WHILE HEALTHY FOOD GOES TO WASTE. OUR MISSION IS TO DRIVE HUNGER FROM OUR COMMUNITIES TODAY AND TO END HUNGER FOR GOOD. We have a commitment to always…

Food & Nutrition
10
Ch Pennsylvania Under - 21

Our mission is to serve children and youth facing homelessness and human trafficking, and to protect and safeguard all children. we provide trauma-informed interventions for youth who are in need.covenant house pennsylvania (chpa) remains…

Housing & Shelter
11
Family Service Association of Bucks County

Mission: we listen, care and help. every day. vision: a community where anyone can achieve their full potential. programs: our services treat mental health issues; reduce substance use; shelter, feed, educate and seek permanent housing for…

Human Services
12
Bethanna

Bethanna is a christian non-profit social service organization providing services to children and families in philadelphia, southeastern and central pennsylvania. founded as a bible and missionary organization, bethanna whose name means…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sisters Place Inc; the most unlike its peers is Little Sisters of the Poor. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

157 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 157 of the 391 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
38
Early backer (in before they grew)
151/157
Grantees still filing
114/157
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST THOMAS MORE PARISH: $804,000 · OtherST THOMAS MORE PARISHST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY: $703,146 · OtherST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETYIndividual grant recipient: $276,942 · OtherWASHINGTON CHRISTIAN OUTREACH INC: $275,000 · Other+137 more: $6,063,500 · Other+137 moreWASHINGTON CITY MISSION: $781,000 · Human ServicesWASHINGTON CITY MI…LEMOYNE COMMUNITY CENTER: $120,000 · Human ServicesLEMOYNE COMMUNITY …JUBILEE ASSOCIATION INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesLIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $91,500 · Human ServicesCASA SAN JOSE: $82,000 · Human ServicesPENNSYLVANIA WOMEN WORK: $77,000 · Human ServicesMERAKEY ALLEGHENY VALLEY SCHOOL: $75,000 · Human Services+21 more: $823,300 · Human Services+21 moreSTOREHOUSE FOR TEACHERS D/B/A THE EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP: $944,830 · EducationSTOREHOUS…THE EARLY LEARNING INSTITUTE: $50,000 · Education+4 more: $84,000 · Education+4 moreHOPE GROWS: $115,000 · HealthMERAKEY FOUNDATION: $109,000 · HealthPREGNANCY CARE CENTERS DBA NETWORK OF LIFE: $90,000 · HealthNoah Angelici Hope Foundation: $50,000 · HealthNORTH SIDE CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTER: $50,000 · HealthCANCER BRIDGES: $50,000 · HealthHAIR PEACE CHARITIES: $40,000 · HealthNO LONGER BOUND INC: $25,400 · Health+3 more: $45,400 · HealthGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $251,600 · Food & NutritionFOOD HELPERS: $183,500 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS THE CROSSROADS: $50,000 · Food & NutritionFRANKLIN AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $28,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD ASSISTANCE MATCH INC: $20,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $18,000 · Food & NutritionSOUTH HILLS INTERFAITH MINISTRIES: $188,600 · ReligionBEYOND SURVIVAL MINISTRIES INC: $55,000 · ReligionTHE SINGLE MOM KC: $19,400 · ReligionMCGUIRE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $66,500 · PhilanthropyHOMELESS CHILDREN'S EDUCATION FUND: $40,000 · PhilanthropySAMSARA FOUNDATION: $40,000 · PhilanthropyBest of the Batch Foundation: $19,500 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$8,122,588Human Services$2,149,800Education$1,078,830Health$574,800Food & Nutrition$551,100Religion$263,000Philanthropy$176,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTOREHOUSE FOR TEACHERS D/B/A THE EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP: $944,830 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetWASHINGTON CITY MISSION: $781,000 over 9y, 4.0% of budgetWASHINGTON CHRISTIAN OUTREACH INC: $275,000 over 9y, 27% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $270,000 over 9y, 100% of budgetGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $251,600 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTH HILLS INTERFAITH MINISTRIES: $188,600 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetFOOD HELPERS: $183,500 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetPITTSBURGH HIRES VETERANS: $145,000 over 8y, 11% of budgetNORTH HILLS COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC: $130,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetLEMOYNE COMMUNITY CENTER: $120,000 over 9y, 3.3% of budgetASHTABULA DREAM CENTER: $116,000 over 6y, 25% of budgetHOPE GROWS: $115,000 over 8y, 11% of budgetMERAKEY FOUNDATION: $109,000 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetFOCUS ON RENEWAL STO-ROX NEIGHBORHOOD CORPORATION: $100,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetJUBILEE ASSOCIATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetLIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $91,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetPREGNANCY CARE CENTERS DBA NETWORK OF LIFE: $90,000 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetCASA SAN JOSE: $82,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA WOMEN WORK: $77,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetMERAKEY ALLEGHENY VALLEY SCHOOL: $75,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INTERSECTION: $70,500 over 7y, 2.9% of budgetSISTERS PLACE INC: $70,000 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL OF PHILADE OF PHILADELPHIA: $70,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetVETERANS PLACE OF WASHINGTON BOULEVARD: $67,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetMCGUIRE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $66,500 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetTHE WATSON INSTITUTE: $63,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetAngels Place Inc: $62,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetSOUTHWINDS INC: $60,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY AT HOLY FAMILY MANOR: $60,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $57,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetBEVERLY'S PGH: $57,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetHOLY FAMILY INSTITUTE: $57,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBEYOND SURVIVAL MINISTRIES INC: $55,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $55,000 over 7y, 9.8% of budgetBOUNTIFUL BLESSINGS INC: $55,000 over 8y, 3.6% of budgetJEREMIAH'S PLACE PITTSBURGH RELIEF NURSERY: $53,500 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetVETERANS BREAKFAST CLUB: $51,000 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetFAMILY GUIDANCE INC: $50,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetNoah Angelici Hope Foundation: $50,000 over 8y, 7.2% of budgetNORTH SIDE CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTER: $50,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetEAST END COOPERATIVE MINISTRY: $50,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS THE CROSSROADS: $50,000 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetGENESIS OF PITTSBURGH INC: $50,000 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetBLACKBURN CENTER INC: $50,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCANCER BRIDGES: $50,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetTHE EARLY LEARNING INSTITUTE: $50,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetCASA of Allegheny County: $46,000 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetHOMELESS CHILDREN'S EDUCATION FUND: $40,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STOREHOUSE FOR TEACHERS D/B/A THE EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON CITY MISSION ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON CHRISTIAN OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR ↗
  • Who funds GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH HILLS INTERFAITH MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds FOOD HELPERS ↗
  • Who funds PITTSBURGH HIRES VETERANS ↗
  • Who funds NORTH HILLS COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds LEMOYNE COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ASHTABULA DREAM CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HOPE GROWS ↗
  • Who funds MERAKEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOCUS ON RENEWAL STO-ROX NEIGHBORHOOD CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds JUBILEE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds PREGNANCY CARE CENTERS DBA NETWORK OF LIFE ↗
  • Who funds CASA SAN JOSE ↗
  • Who funds PENNSYLVANIA WOMEN WORK ↗
  • Who funds MERAKEY ALLEGHENY VALLEY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE INTERSECTION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The United Way of Southwestern PennsylvaniaPA101.6× affinity53 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · The Pittsburgh Foundation · Edward B Dunlap Jr Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · Snee-Reinhardt Charitable Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Eqt Foundation · Aj and Sigismunda Palumbo Charitable Trust · The Grable Foundation · The Jack Buncher Foundation · Staunton Farm Foundation 540-054 Dba Staunton Farm Foundation · Howard & Nell E Miller Foundat

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Centimark Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Centimark Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • House of Hope Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Metropolitan Ministries Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
45report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Centimark Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Centimark Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 391 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Centimark’s filings →

More from the funding graph