· Private foundation
Bull Henry W Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k52 grants · $245k
- $10k–50k25 grants · $407k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NYC DANCE ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC | $40,000 |
| PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL FILM SOCIETY | $40,000 |
| DEZART PERFORMS | $35,000 |
| THE LIVING DESERT | $30,000 |
| PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| FRIENDS OF THE DESERT MOUNTAINS | $20,000 |
| CHIMPANZEE SANCTUARY NORTHWEST | $20,000 |
| SANTA BARBARA EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $18,000 |
| MUSIC ACADEMY OF THE WEST | $15,000 |
| SB ACT | $15,000 |
| LITTLE STAR PONY FOUNDATION | $12,000 |
| COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER OF SAN LUIS | $12,000 |
| SANTA BARBARA HIGH SCHOOL COMPUTER SCIEN | $10,000 |
| PERFORMING ARTS CENTER | $10,000 |
| CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT INC | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $380k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
98 repeat relationships — 43 still active in FY2025, 55 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $281k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PLPacific Legal Foundation6× · 2019–2025 · $220k · revenue +72%
- DPDezart Performs5× · 2020–2025 · $185k · revenue +421%
- SLSAN LUIS OBISPO SYMPHONY INC3× · 2020–2024 · $140k · revenue +41%
Funded once
- NYNEW YORK CITY DANCE ALLIANCEone grant, 2024 · $40k
- CPCALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVone grant, 2019 · $30k
- TPTRAVELING PAWS INCone grant, 2022 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…
In addition to rescue and adoption, pet orphans provides a wide range of services including education, medical/financial, spay/neuter, and training assistance.
To operate community service centers to improve physical,social and financial conditions for the disabled and the elderly.
The mission of the Family Care Network is to enhance the wellbeing of children, adults, and families in partnership with our community.
See schedule orancho coastal is dedicated to the rescue and shelter of abandoned companion animals. it encourages adoptions into loving homes and provides educational and community outreach programs designed to enhance the human-animal…
California casa was founded in 1987. its mission is to ensure that children and youth in the child welfare and juvenile justice systems have both a voice and the services they need to thrive. we achieve this by strengthening and empowering…
Drc works in partnership with disabled people to defend rights, advance opportunities, grow power, and expand public support for disability justice in california and beyond.
La Casa de las Madres' mission is to respond to calls for help from DV victims, of all ages, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. We give survivors the tools to transform their lives. We seek to prevent future violence by educating the…
The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.
Believing in the value of every life, mary's path empowers vulnerable teen mothers in foster care and their babies to create lives of dignity, hope and self-sufficiency.
The california wildlife center (cwc) takes responsibility for the protection of all native wildlife through rehabilitiation, education and conservation. as the los angeles area's premier wildlife medical care and rehabilitation facility,…
To provide high-quality civil legal services to vulnerable santa barbara county residents.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals and the most unlike its peers is Doheny Eye Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
198 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 198 of the 285 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Pacific Legal Foundation ↗
- Who funds Dezart Performs ↗
- Who funds SAN LUIS OBISPO SYMPHONY INC ↗
- Who funds DAP Health Inc ↗
- Who funds CHIMPANZEE SANCTUARY NORTHWEST ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE DESERT MOUNTAINS ↗
- Who funds Orchestra Novo Inc ↗
- Who funds Opera San Luis Obispo Inc ↗
- Who funds Children of the Night ↗
- Who funds PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL FILM SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds NYC DANCE ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DUNN SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds KECK MEDICAL CENTER OF USC ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF CARPINTERIA ↗
- Who funds Sansum Diabetes Research Institute ↗
- Who funds TEDDY BEAR CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDSHIP ADULT DAY CARE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SAN LUIS OBISPO MASTER CHORALE ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF SANTA BARBARA INC ↗
- Who funds LIVING DESERT THE ↗
- Who funds MUSIC ACADEMY OF THE WEST ↗
- Who funds HILLSIDE HOUSE ↗
- Who funds SAN LUIS OBISPO WIND ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds AIDS Assistance Program ↗
- Who funds SAN LUIS OBISPO MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds ADVANCING COLLECTIVE TRANSFORMATION (FKA UFFIZI ORDER)(DBA-SBACT) ↗
- Who funds CARE4Paws Inc ↗
- Who funds JODI HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
- Who funds Wilderness Youth Project Inc ↗
- Who funds Santa Barbara Education Foundation ↗
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA MARITIME MUSEUM ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Santa Barbara Foundation · Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation · Williams-Corbett Foundation · Ann Jackson Family Foundation · Latkin Charitable Foundation · The Wood-Claeyssens Foundation · June G Outhwaite Charitable Trust JS Poucher KL Englert & CM Cooney Co-Tr · Towbes Foundation · Mosher Foundation · Alice Tweed Tuohy Foundation · St Francis Foundation of Santa Barbara · Volentine Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Bull Henry W Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Florida Dream Center Inc — 0% of income from government
- Milton Academy — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.