· Private foundation
June G Outhwaite Charitable Trust JS Poucher KL Englert & CM Cooney Co-Tr
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 50% of June G Outhwaite Charitable Trust JS Poucher KL Englert & CM Cooney Co-Tr’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k16 grants · $83k
- $10k–50k37 grants · $505k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $130k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Fellowship Of Christian Athletes | $80,000 |
| Family Service Agency Of Santa Barbara County | $50,000 |
| Santa Barbara Zoological Foundation | $30,000 |
| Council On Alcoholism & Drug Abuse | $25,000 |
| Risb Foundation | $25,000 |
| Cancer Foundation Of Santa Barbara | $25,000 |
| Carpinteria Childrens Project | $20,000 |
| Pathpoint | $20,000 |
| Court Appointed Special Advocates Of Santa Barbara County | $20,000 |
| Showers of Blessing Santa Barbara | $20,000 |
| The Land Trust For Santa Barbara County | $20,000 |
| Habitat For Humanity International Inc | $15,000 |
| Santa Barbara Maritime Museum | $15,000 |
| Alexander House Foundation | $15,000 |
| Santa Barbara Trust For Historic Preservation | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $580k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +62% since the first grant, against +53% for the ones you funded once.
94 repeat relationships — 44 still active in FY2024, 50 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $105k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FOFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES8× · 2017–2024 · $380k · revenue +120%
- YAYoung America's Foundation7× · 2017–2023 · $300k · revenue +67%
DIRECT RELIEF5× · 2017–2022 · $275k · revenue +94%
Funded once
- NVNORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FUNDone grant, 2018 · $51k
- UWUNITED WAY OF SB COUNTYone grant, 2020 · $50k
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITYone grant, 2017 · $33k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…
Our mission is to protect public trail access build and maintain safe and sustainable trails and promote public engagement in land stewardship and trail use for all types of outdoor recreation.
The mission of st. francis foundation of santa barbara is to promote and support health care.
To operate a school for grades 6-9, delivering a holistic program of academics, arts & athletics, community service, and outdoor education that fosters passion for life and learning, self trust, strength and courage to succeed, and…
It is the mission of Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital Foundation to solicit, receive, invest, maintain and distribute funds for the support of charitable, scientific, and educational activities of Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital.
New house dedicates itself to providing a clean and sober, healthy environment that allows men with alcohol and other drug problems to begin their journey of recovery and to reclaim their dignity, self-esteem, and sense of purpose. new…
To provide high-quality civil legal services to vulnerable santa barbara county residents.
Cemetery association
The sbcc foundation fuels the excellence of santa barbara city college by engaging the community, building relationships, and inviting the generosity of donors. the resources raised and managed by the foundation enrich college programs,…
The mission of the santa barbara south coast chamber of commerce is to create a strong local economy, promote the community, provide business resources and networking opportunities and represent business to the government.
The organization was established to protect and restore the santa barbara channel and its watersheds through science-based advocacy, education, field work, community engagement, and citizen enforcement of environmental laws.
To provide citizens with access to television and other electronic media resources in order to facilitate public dialogue, free speech and participatory democracy; to foster local creativity, education and culture; and to reflect our…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Santa Barbara Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Santa Cruz Island Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
88 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 88 of the 143 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
- Who funds Young America's Foundation ↗
- Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CARPINTERIA CHILDREN'S PROJECT ↗
- Who funds UNITY SHOPPE INC ↗
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA MARITIME MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds Council on Alcoholism & Drug Abuse ↗
- Who funds TRANSITION HOUSE ↗
- Who funds JODI HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds HILLSIDE HOUSE ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds THE LAND TRUST FOR SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds ALEXANDER HOUSE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Pathpoint ↗
- Who funds Channel Islands Young Men's Christian Association ↗
- Who funds FRIENDSHIP ADULT DAY CARE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF SANTA BARBARA INC ↗
- Who funds SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF SANTA BARBARA ↗
- Who funds SHOWERS OF BLESSING SANTA BARBARA ↗
- Who funds CALM INC ↗
- Who funds EASY LIFT TRANSPORTATION INC ↗
- Who funds STORYTELLER CHILDRENS CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation · Santa Barbara Foundation · Ann Jackson Family Foundation · Latkin Charitable Foundation · Towbes Foundation · Williams-Corbett Foundation · The Wood-Claeyssens Foundation · Mosher Foundation · Alice Tweed Tuohy Foundation · James S Bower Foundation · Bull Henry W Foundation · Volentine Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization June G Outhwaite Charitable Trust JS Poucher KL Englert & CM Cooney Co-Tr funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.