New Mexico · Nonprofit
COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT (New Mexico) receives grants from 14 organizations whose IRS filings report $727,946 to it, the largest being SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($290,375). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 79% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- Revenue FY2025
- $783k
- Funders on record
- 14
- Grants received
- $728k
- Net assets
- $1.1M
What Court Appointed Special Advocates First Judicial District does
Mission
The mission of casa, first judicial district is to support and promote volunteer advocacy so that children and youth from santa fe, rio arriba, and los alamos counties who are trauma-impacted or system-involved can be safe, have permanent connections, and the opportunity to thrive.
As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.
Program
Court appointed special advocates (casas) are matched with a foster child, advocating forthem during their case. Casas provide comprehensive reports to the child welfare judge, and make sure foster children have the medical, developmental, educational, and mental health assessments and services they need.abrigo advocates is a prevention-oriented program that supports children and families whoneed extra help. Abrigos provide practical resources, connection, and advocacy for children and youth who are unhoused, in kinship guardianship placements, could benefit from an extra safe adult in their corner, or have experienced trauma. Abrigos also provide a way for casas to remain connected to foster children after their case closes.youth ambassadors provides volunteer, community, and leadership building for youngpeople, most of whom are clients. Youth ambassadors participate in social-emotional skillbuilding workshops and civic engagement. The ya program provides a safe space for youth, building empathy for peers who have experienced hardships.all three programs grew and we served more children and families this year. In addition to broadening supports for vulnerable children and…
$400,935 spent$101,500 earned by the program100% of program spending
The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $400,935.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Balance sheet
Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $614k to $851k (+39%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2017 15% · 2018 15% · 2019 18% · 2020 22% · 2021 26% · 2022 18% · 2023 12% · 2024 13% · 2025 8%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
83% of COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (99% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Leadership and staff
The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.
Chief executive
Annie Rasquin
Executive director
As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 7 funders, grant income rose $16k → $118k.
8 of 14 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 79% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT leans on a few funders — its largest provides 40% of grant income and the top three 67%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
95% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 65% · 2018 41% · 2019 49% · 2020 55% · 2021 49% · 2022 20% · 2023 39% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
57% of COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 71% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
79% of COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $149k that is directly attributable, 94% of it comes from New Mexico funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $579k arriving through sponsors registered in 8 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Against its field
COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 904 civil rights nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 904 civil rights nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025
Organizations like COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In New Mexico
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
75% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
98%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT?
- COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT (New Mexico) receives grants from 14 organizations whose IRS filings report $727,946 to it, the largest being SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($290,375). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 79% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- How many funders does COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT have?
- IRS filings report 14 organizations giving $727,946 in grants to COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT, 10 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT?
- SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $290,375 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in New Mexico. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
Play a game about who funds Court Appointed Special Advocates First Judicial District →
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 14 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing