· Private foundation
Kosasa Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $24k
- $10k–50k40 grants · $1.0M
- $50k–250k36 grants · $3.2M
- $250k+3 grants · $1.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HAWAIIAN COMMUNITY ASSETS | $500,000 |
| SOCIAL FINANCE INC | $250,000 |
| HAWAIIAN ISLANDS LAND TRUST | $250,000 |
| FEED THE HUNGER FUND | $200,000 |
| HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $200,000 |
| INSTITUTE FOR NATIVE PACIFIC EDUCATION AND CULTURE | $200,000 |
| MALAMA MAUNALUA | $100,000 |
| HOOLA NA PUA | $100,000 |
| ADULT FRIENDS FOR YOUTH | $100,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MAUI | $100,000 |
| KOKUA KALIHI VALLEY | $100,000 |
| RE-USE HAWAI'I | $100,000 |
| THE KOHALA CENTER | $100,000 |
| KUPU | $100,000 |
| THE NATURE CONSERVANCY | $100,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
89 repeat relationships — 47 still active in FY2024, 42 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.4M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KMKUAKINI MEDICAL CENTER4× · 2020–2023 · $2.5M · revenue +23%
- MIMID-PACIFIC INSTITUTE4× · 2020–2023 · $1.2M · revenue +27%
- YMYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF HONOLULU4× · 2020–2023 · $925k · revenue +97%
Funded once
- HCHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION - KOSASA FAMILY FUNDone grant, 2021 · $2.0M
- DCDYNAMIC COMMUNITY SOLUTIONSone grant, 2023 · $1.0M · revenue -66%
- BBBLOOD BANK OF HAWAIIone grant, 2022 · $500k · revenue +19%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Papahana kuaola's mission is to create quality educational programs focused on environmental restoration and economic sustainability fully integrated with hawaiian knowledge in order to exemplify a lifestyle respectful of kanaka, `aina,…
Our mission is to protect, perpetuate, and enhance the cultural and natural landscape of the kiholo bay area through collaborative management and active community stewardship.
To improve the health and well-being of our community.
Growing hawaii's communities through culturally based forms of innovative learning, leadership development, and collaborative networking in wahi kupuna stewardship.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Partners in Development Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Hawaii Book and Music Festival. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
138 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 138 of the 174 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds KUAKINI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds MID-PACIFIC INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds DYNAMIC COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF HONOLULU ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JAPANESE AMERICAN NATIONAL MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds BLOOD BANK OF HAWAII ↗
- Who funds HAWAIIAN COMMUNITY ASSETS INC ↗
- Who funds HAWAII PUBLIC TELEVISION FOUNDATION DBA PBS HAWAII ↗
- Who funds WAIANAE COMMUNITY RE-DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds HO'OLA NA PUA ↗
- Who funds HAWAII SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
- Who funds The Koloa Early School ↗
- Who funds Realize Impact ↗
- Who funds HAWAIIAN ISLANDS LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds IMUA FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Rehabilitation Hospital of the Pacific Foundation ↗
- Who funds HAWAIIAN HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds THE MEDIATION CENTER OF THE PACIFIC INC ↗
- Who funds HAWAII FOODBANK INC ↗
- Who funds HAWAII CORD BLOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION IN HAWAII ↗
- Who funds KUPU ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR NATIVE PACIFIC EDUCATION AND CULTURE ↗
- Who funds KOKUA KALIHI VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds ADULT FRIENDS FOR YOUTH ↗
- Who funds MAUI HUI MALAMA ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF MAUI INC ↗
- Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds RE-USE HAWAII ↗
- Who funds PURPLE MAIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds 808 CLEANUPS ↗
- Who funds ISLAND SCHOOL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Atherton Family Foundation · J Watumull Fund · McInerny Foundation-- · Aloha United Way Inc · Bank of Hawaii Charitable Fdn · Central Pacific Bank Foundation · Tradewind Group Foundation · Cooke Foundation Limited · First Hawaiian Bank Foundation · First Insurance Company of Hawaii Charitable Foundation · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · Trustees of the Estate of Bernice Pauahi Bishop Dba Kamehameha Schools
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Kosasa Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Kosasa Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Kosasa Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.