· Private foundation
Arnia Foundation
TO MAKE THINGS BETTER FOR THE PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES US EAGLE SERVES AND LIVES IN.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k71 grants · $125k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $62k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $20,000 |
| RIO GRANDE FOOD PROJECT | $14,718 |
| A NEW DAY INC | $14,428 |
| ALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $12,605 |
| VETERAN'S INTEGRATION CENTER | $8,094 |
| PAWS & STRIPES | $5,594 |
| EXPLORA SCIENCE CENTER | $5,000 |
| CASA ESPERANZA | $4,836 |
| GREATER COMMUNITIES | $3,500 |
| SANTE FE CHILDRENS MUSEUM | $3,500 |
| ABQ SIGN LANGUAGE ACADEMY | $3,000 |
| SANDIA HIGH SCHOOL | $2,500 |
| FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION | $2,500 |
| SARANAM | $2,500 |
| NORTH VALLEY ACADEMY | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $39k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against -6% for the ones you funded once.
33 repeat relationships — 32 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 42 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $61k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CUCREDIT UNION FOUNDATION OF NEW MEXICO FKA NM CU EDUCATION FOUNDATION2× · 2021–2022 · $170k · revenue +38%
- RGRIO GRANDE FOOD PROJECT4× · 2021–2024 · $119k · revenue +63%
- ESEXPLORA SCIENCE CENTER & CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF ALBUQUERQUE INC3× · 2021–2024 · $66k · revenue +172%
Funded once
- NCNM CREDIT UNION FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $43k
- UWUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL NMone grant, 2023 · $25k
- NMNEW MEXICO BLACK LEADERSHIP COUNCILone grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue -45%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To improve the status, well-being and racial/ethnic equity of new mexicos children, families, and communities in the areas of health, education, and economic security by promoting public policies through credible research and effective…
To assist communities to create solutions to homelessness from prevention through permanent housing by using action, advocacy, and awareness.
The casa program is a community-based program that recruits, trains and supports citizen-volunteers to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children in courtrooms and communities. the organization serves children in…
Strengthening new mexico by educating and connecting diverse leaders through experiential learning programs and activities.
Cplc new mexico, inc. is dedicated to improving the economic well-being and quality of life for low-income residents of northern new mexico, while seeking to preserve the area's unique cultural, historical and social traditions and way of…
The new mexico housing and community development corporation is successfully promoting the availability and quality of affordable housing for moderate and low income families throughout new mexico through the means of property…
The mission of growing up new mexico is to engage the whole community, bringing together people and resources to create increased opportunities for young children and the adults in their lives to achieve their dreams and aspirations.
Bold futures nm leads policy change, research, place-based organizing, and culture shift by and for women and people of color in new mexico. bold futures nm centers the lived experiences and expertise of those most impacted by an issue,…
The mission of NMCNE is to advance and engage the nursing community to promote excellence and improve the health of all New Mexicans.
As the voice of the building industry, the new mexico construction alliance seeks to support the community and local businesses by providing educational opportunities, advocating for the regulations that benefit a strong housing market,…
New mexico dream center's mission is to restore the dreams of the hopeless, the helpless, the hurting and the broken. specifically, albuquerque new mexico has a huge gaping hole in services for homeless youth and trafficked minor children.…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa Esperanza Inc and the most unlike its peers is Farmington Amateur Baseball Congress. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 126 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CREDIT UNION FOUNDATION OF NEW MEXICO FKA NM CU EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RIO GRANDE FOOD PROJECT ↗
- Who funds EXPLORA SCIENCE CENTER & CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF ALBUQUERQUE INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTH CENTRAL NEW MEXICO ↗
- Who funds CASA ESPERANZA INC ↗
- Who funds PAWS AND STRIPES INC ↗
- Who funds ALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds A NEW DAY INC ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO BLACK LEADERSHIP COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds SUPPORTIVE HOUSING COALITION OF NEW MEXICO ↗
- Who funds SANTA FE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds CUIDANDO LOS NIOS INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CREDIT UNION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALOHA UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds PARTICIPA INC ↗
- Who funds St Vincent Hospital ↗
- Who funds Meals on Wheels New Mexico ↗
- Who funds GREATER COMMUNITIES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Albuquerque Community Foundation · Nusenda Foundation · Pnm Tnmp Foundation · Santa Fe Community Foundation · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · Washington Federal Foundation · Bob & Lamee Holscher Charitable Nka · Hancock Family Foundation Inc · Lineberry Foundation · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · New Mexico Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Arnia Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.