New Mexico · Nonprofit
ANIMAL PROTECTION VOTERS
ANIMAL PROTECTION VOTERS (New Mexico) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $100,500 to it, the largest being Carroll Petrie Foundation co David J Stoll Milbank LLP ($100,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Wilburforce Foundationshared funders
- The Humane Leagueportfolio match
- The Fund for Animals Incportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.
Left out of every figure on this page: $1.7M from one payer (the payer shares this organization's board, largest Animal Protection of New Mexico Inc). These are real filings, and they are not money ANIMAL PROTECTION VOTERS raised.
From the IRS filings of ANIMAL PROTECTION VOTERS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
ANIMAL PROTECTION VOTERS leans on a few funders — its largest provides 100% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
ANIMAL PROTECTION VOTERS draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside New Mexico, across 2 states in all.
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
- Wilburforce Foundationshared fundersWA · backs 26 organizations that share your funders
- The Humane Leagueportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Fund for Animals Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Candis J Stern Charitable Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Robert a Schmidt Md & Viola G Schmi Family Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Patricia Florence Miller Trustportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Allene & Jerome Lapides Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Joyce a Ward Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Anne Embree Charitable Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Bonner Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Lacey Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Mas Family Charitable Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like ANIMAL PROTECTION VOTERS
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In New Mexico
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
87% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for ANIMAL PROTECTION VOTERS: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds ANIMAL PROTECTION VOTERS?
- ANIMAL PROTECTION VOTERS (New Mexico) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $100,500 to it, the largest being Carroll Petrie Foundation co David J Stoll Milbank LLP ($100,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does ANIMAL PROTECTION VOTERS have?
- IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $100,500 in grants to ANIMAL PROTECTION VOTERS.
- Who is the largest funder of ANIMAL PROTECTION VOTERS?
- Carroll Petrie Foundation co David J Stoll Milbank LLP is the largest funder on record, with $100,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like ANIMAL PROTECTION VOTERS find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in New Mexico. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing