· Private foundation
Aptargroup Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k108 grants · $145k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $177k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $125k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CARE USA | $125,000 |
| Bunker Hill Charities | $36,135 |
| Lipstick Angels | $25,000 |
| Fostering Kindness | $25,000 |
| Scholarship America | $22,500 |
| Metropolitan Planning Council | $15,000 |
| Raue Center for the Arts | $12,000 |
| Ocean Conservancy | $11,500 |
| Tunnel to Towers Foundation | $10,000 |
| PADS | $10,000 |
| Home of the Sparrow | $10,000 |
| Shirley Ryan AbilityLab | $7,500 |
| Pioneer Center For Human Services | $7,000 |
| United Way of Greater McHenry Count | $6,000 |
| United Way of Greater McHenry Count | $5,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $142k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 9% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
110 repeat relationships — 59 still active in FY2024, 51 since wound down; 32 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $93k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC4× · 2021–2024 · $376k · revenue +12%- OCOCEAN CONSERVANCY5× · 2020–2024 · $88k · revenue +45%
- RIRehabilitation Institute of Chicago5× · 2020–2024 · $70k · revenue +27%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $30k
- WCWILLOW CREEK RANCH INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +28%
- AHATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +31%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…
To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.
Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.
Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…
Community care health plan's mission is to develop and demonstrate innovative, flexible, community-based approaches to care for at-risk adults, in order to optimize their quality of life and optimize the allocation of community resources.
Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.
Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.
We exist to serve our patients with compassionate health care of the highest quality.
Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlanta Union Mission Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Bullock Creek Youth Wrestling Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.6% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
164 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 164 of the 279 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
- Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN PLANNING COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago ↗
- Who funds RAUE CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds BUNKER HILL CHARITIES ↗
- Who funds Home of the Sparrow Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER McHENRY COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds PADS OF ELGIN INC ↗
- Who funds Turning Point Inc ↗
- Who funds WILLOW CREEK RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds LIPSTICK ANGELS ↗
- Who funds ATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE DIAPER ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds Fostering Kindness Corp ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds Pioneer Center for Human Services ↗
- Who funds WAUKESHA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Fellowship Housing Corporation ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF EAST ALABAMA INC ↗
- Who funds Haase Community Connections Inc ↗
- Who funds OUTRIGHT INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds STERLING HOUSE COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds GOOD FRIEND INC ↗
- Who funds OPERATION HOPE OF FAIRFIELD INC ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for McHenry County · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Baxter International Foundation · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Foglia Family Foundation · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Full Circle Foundation · The Bersted Foundation · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group · Howard and Geraldine Knaack Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Aptargroup Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Center for Family Justice Inc — 49% of income from government
- Operation Hope of Fairfield Inc — 15% of income from government
- Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
- The Montclair Art Museum — 11% of income from government
- Sterling House Community Center Inc — 8% of income from government
- Ballet Fantastique — 2% of income from government
- American International College — 1% of income from government
- Connecticut Audubon Society Inc — 1% of income from government
- Sandy Hook Promise Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
- Food for the Poor Inc — 0% of income from government
- Kars 4 Kids Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Aptargroup Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Aptargroup Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.