· Private foundation
The Bersted Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $23k
- $10k–50k70 grants · $1.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DUPAGE PADS | $30,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY DUPAGE COUNTY | $30,000 |
| SUICIDE PREVENTION SERVICES | $30,000 |
| NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK | $25,000 |
| OUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES | $25,000 |
| MARKLUND CHILDREN'S HOME | $25,000 |
| PEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER | $25,000 |
| SENIOR HOME SHARING | $25,000 |
| FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF DEKALB COUNTY | $25,000 |
| WAYSIDE CROSS MINISTRIES | $25,000 |
| VOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER OF DEKALB COUNTY | $24,500 |
| RAY GRAHAM ASSN FOR DISABLED PEOPLE | $21,600 |
| LOAVES & FISHES COMMUNITY PANTRY | $20,000 |
| NAMI OF DUPAGE COUNTY ILLINOIS | $20,000 |
| RAMP INC | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 16% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.
94 repeat relationships — 52 still active in FY2025, 42 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $290k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OCOUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES7× · 2019–2025 · $175k · revenue +71%
- PRPEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER7× · 2019–2025 · $160k · revenue +81%
- SHSenior Home Sharing7× · 2019–2025 · $155k · revenue +25%
Funded once
- YSYOUTH SERVICE BUREAU OF ILLINOISone grant, 2019 · $34k
- FVFOX VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITYone grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue +24%
- FHFamily Health Partnership Clinicgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue +42%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide residential and rehabilitation services to clients with mental illnesses
Administering an array of critical, intensive therapeutic interventions and/or facilitation services to emotionally and behaviorally disturbed clients for whom DCFS is legally responsible in order to stabilize their traditional or home of…
Operate homes for the aged and to conduct charitable and benevolent enterprises
Empowering individuals with developmental disabilities and their families through advocacy and the coordination of service options
To enhance the quality of life for children and families by inspiring hope and empowerment and growth within all whom we serve.
To assist children who have been victims of abuse
To foster stronger communities by providing individuals with accessible, professional counseling and mental health care that empowers them to thrive
Crosspoint human services provides quality human services in a competent and reliable fashion to individuals, families and the community.
We strive to make aging easier through the development of a network of services for older persons designed to optimize the quality of their lives.
To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…
Strive to improve the health and well being of migrant and seasonal farmworkers and other medically vulnerable populations by providing quality accessable, affordable, and culturally responsive health care within the community we serve.
The mission of goodwill is to create opportunities for individuals with barriers to enhance their lives. barriers include physical or mental disabilities, lack of education and job preparation, socio-economic disadvantages, and others.…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Little Friends Inc and the most unlike its peers is Simply Destinee. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
106 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 106 of the 154 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds Senior Home Sharing ↗
- Who funds MUTUAL GROUND INC ↗
- Who funds DUPAGE PADS INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds NAMI OF DUPAGE COUNTY ILLINOIS ↗
- Who funds AURORA AREA INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY ↗
- Who funds GREATER FAMILY HEALTH ↗
- Who funds ALIVE CENTER NFP ↗
- Who funds DONKA INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds CASA KANE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF DEKALB COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Neighborhood Food Pantries ↗
- Who funds MARKLUND CHILDRENS HOME ↗
- Who funds LITTLE FRIENDS INC ↗
- Who funds BRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds Riverwoods Christian Center dba Fox Valley Christian Action ↗
- Who funds TEEN PARENT CONNECTION INC ↗
- Who funds Family Shelter Service Inc ↗
- Who funds CASA OF DUPAGE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds DUPAGE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds ADVENTURE WORKS OF DEKALB COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Girl Scouts of Greater Chicago and Northwest Indiana ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS ↗
- Who funds ROSECRANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Elyssas Mission NFP ↗
- Who funds THE MORTON ARBORETUM ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF JOLIET ↗
- Who funds REGIONAL ACCESS & MOBILIZATION PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Independence Health & Therapy ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY HOUSE ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST DUPAGE FAMILY AND YOUTH SERVICES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Dupage Community Foundation · Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group · Community Foundation of the Fox River Valley · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Northern Illinois Food Bank · Fox Valley United Way · George M Eisenberg Foundation for Charities · Naperville Rotary Charities Inc · Dunham Fund · The Community Foundation for McHenry County · Topfer Family Foundation · Ft Cares Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Bersted Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals — 67% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.