Skip to content
Aptargroup Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Aptargroup Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$447k
Granted FY2024still arriving
119
Grants FY2024still arriving
19
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

International$419kHealth$356kEducation$278kPublic Safety & Disaster$261kHuman Services$176kHousing & Shelter$149kPhilanthropy$146kArts & Culture$101kOther$0
02FY2024 · 119 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k108 grants · $145k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $177k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $125k
$1,000
Median grant
19
States reached
$67k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CARE USA$125,000
Bunker Hill Charities$36,135
Fostering Kindness$25,000
Lipstick Angels$25,000
Scholarship America$22,500
Metropolitan Planning Council$15,000
Raue Center for the Arts$12,000
Ocean Conservancy$11,500
PADS$10,000
Tunnel to Towers Foundation$10,000
Home of the Sparrow$10,000
Shirley Ryan AbilityLab$7,500
Pioneer Center For Human Services$7,000
United Way of Greater McHenry Count$6,000
United Way of Greater McHenry Count$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $142k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 9% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Long Island Cares: $2k → 7%Bella House: $200 → 5%Veterans Outreach of Wisconsin: $2k → 10%Sunshine Place: $400 → 10%Lakeway CASA Inc: $1k → 15%Turning Point: $10k → 8%Winnebago County CASA: $500 → 15%Meals on Wheels Collin County: $300 → 5%The Women's Center Inc: $2k → 5%Sunshine Place: $200 → 10%Center For Family Justice: $2k → 9%Lakeway CASA Inc: $1k → 15%United for Haiti: $3k → 6%Underground Railroad Inc: $1k → 18%Agape House: $400 → 10%Sunshine Place: $200 → 10%Lakeway CASA Inc: $1k → 15%United for Haiti: $2k → 6%Underground Railroad Inc: $1k → 18%Agape House: $400 → 10%Sterling House Community Center: $5k → 9%Lakeway CASA Inc: $1k → 15%The Women's Center Inc: $1k → 5%Agape House: $100 → 10%Sterling House Community Center: $5k → 9%American Red Cross: $1k → 14%Women's Center: $1k → 5%Sterling House Community Center: $3k → 9%Atlanta Mission: $517 → 13%The Women's Center Inc: $1k → 5%Atlanta Mission: $500 → 13%American Red Cross: $1k → 14%Atlanta Mission: $500 → 13%The Diaper Alliance: $25k → 9%Women's Center: $1k → 5%Pioneer Center For Human Services: $7k → 6%Christmas Clearing Council: $500 → 5%Pioneer Center For Human Services: $7k → 6%Pioneer Center For Human Services: $7k → 6%Haase Community Connections Inc: $4k → 5%Haase Community Connections Inc: $4k → 5%Haase Community Connections Inc: $4k → 5%Turning Point: $10k → 6%Haase Community Connections Inc: $3k → 5%Turning Point: $9k → 6%Turning Point: $9k → 6%Haase Community Connections Inc: $100 → 5%Options Advocacy For McHenry Coun: $250 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
TN
NC
SC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 110 repeat orgs$510k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

110 repeat relationships: 59 still active in FY2024, 51 since wound down; 32 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

110
131

Total granted

$1.7M
$417k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+21%

Still filing today

63%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $93k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionInternationalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $376k · revenue +12%
  • OC
    OCEAN CONSERVANCY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $88k · revenue +45%
  • RI
    Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago
    5× · 2020–2024 · $70k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $30k
  • TD
    THE DIAPER ALLIANCE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +74%
  • AH
    ATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +31%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
2
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
3
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
4
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
5
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
6
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
7
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
8
Community Care Health Plan Inc

Community care health plan's mission is to develop and demonstrate innovative, flexible, community-based approaches to care for at-risk adults, in order to optimize their quality of life and optimize the allocation of community resources.

Health
9
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
10
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
11
Union Hospital Inc

We exist to serve our patients with compassionate health care of the highest quality.

Health
12
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlanta Union Mission Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Bullock Creek Youth Wrestling Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

164 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 164 of the 279 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
28
Early backer (in before they grew)
159/164
Grantees still filing
117/164
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Care org: $240,201 · OtherCare orgSCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC: $62,500 · OtherBUNKER HILL CHARITIES: $49,830 · OtherScholarship America: $43,750 · OtherRAUE CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $61,700 · OtherMETROPOLITAN PLANNING COUNCIL: $70,000 · OtherMETROPOLITAN PLANNING COUNCIL+134 more: $666,442 · Other+134 moreCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $375,601 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASS…+7 more: $13,500 · InternationalRehabilitation Institute of Chicago: $69,605 · HealthRehabilit…ATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthATRIUM HE…WILLOW CREEK RANCH INC: $25,000 · HealthWILLOW CR…GOOD FRIEND INC: $12,350 · HealthGOOD FRIE…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $9,820 · HealthST JUDE C…THE KAT6 FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 · Health+15 more: $32,036 · Health+15 moreTurning Point Inc: $38,000 · Human ServicesTHE DIAPER ALLIANCE INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesPioneer Center for Human Services: $21,000 · Human ServicesHaase Community Connections Inc: $14,700 · Human ServicesSTERLING HOUSE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $13,000 · Human ServicesTHE WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $6,000 · Human Services+10 more: $22,797 · Human ServicesHome of the Sparrow Inc: $49,050 · Housing & ShelterPADS OF ELGIN INC: $42,000 · Housing & ShelterFellowship Housing Corporation: $16,000 · Housing & ShelterOPERATION HOPE OF FAIRFIELD INC: $10,000 · Housing & Shelter+2 more: $5,750 · Housing & ShelterUNITED WAY OF GREATER McHENRY COUNTY INC: $46,200 · PhilanthropyLIPSTICK ANGELS: $25,000 · PhilanthropyWAUKESHA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,500 · Philanthropy+3 more: $4,800 · PhilanthropyOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $87,550 · EnvironmentMcHenry County Conservation Foundation: $5,250 · Environment+1 more: $1,000 · Environment
Other$1,194,423International$389,101Health$181,811Human Services$140,497Housing & Shelter$122,800Philanthropy$96,500Environment$93,800

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $375,601 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $87,550 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMETROPOLITAN PLANNING COUNCIL: $70,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetRehabilitation Institute of Chicago: $69,605 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRAUE CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $61,700 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetBUNKER HILL CHARITIES: $49,830 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetHome of the Sparrow Inc: $49,050 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER McHENRY COUNTY INC: $46,200 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetPADS OF ELGIN INC: $42,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetTurning Point Inc: $38,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE DIAPER ALLIANCE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFostering Kindness Corp: $25,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetLIPSTICK ANGELS: $25,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetWILLOW CREEK RANCH INC: $25,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $24,350 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $21,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPioneer Center for Human Services: $21,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWAUKESHA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFellowship Housing Corporation: $16,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFOOD BANK OF EAST ALABAMA INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHaase Community Connections Inc: $14,700 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetOUTRIGHT INTERNATIONAL: $13,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTERLING HOUSE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $13,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetGOOD FRIEND INC: $12,350 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetOPERATION HOPE OF FAIRFIELD INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $9,820 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTEM FORWARD INC: $9,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetALEXANDER LEIGH CENTER FOR AUTISM: $9,250 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSamford University: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Way of Midland County: $9,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMETA HOUSE INC: $8,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $8,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLAKESIDE LEGACY FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE KAT6 FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN OF NORTHWEST ILLINOIS: $7,800 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetIndependence Health & Therapy: $7,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $7,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $6,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGood Shepherd Food Bank: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHaiti's Children Inc: $6,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetCAMP MANITO-WISH YMCA INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPROHEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMcHenry County Conservation Foundation: $5,250 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $5,240 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION HOPE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAKEWAY CASA INC: $4,450 over 4y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundat…Greater Milwaukee Fou…Green Bay Packers Fou…Baxter International …Herbert H Kohl Charit…Foglia Family Foundat…United Way of Greater…Full Circle FoundationThe Bersted FoundationEvan & Marion Helfaer…Northwestern Memorial…Howard and Geraldine …
The Community Foundation for McHenry CountyIL44.3× affinity19 shared granteesties to 7 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for McHenry County · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Baxter International Foundation · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Foglia Family Foundation · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Full Circle Foundation · The Bersted Foundation · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group · Howard and Geraldine Knaack Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Aptargroup Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Aptargroup Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • The Center for Family Justice Inc: 49% of income from government
  • Operation Hope of Fairfield Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • The Montclair Art Museum: 11% of income from government
  • Sterling House Community Center Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Ballet Fantastique: 2% of income from government
  • American International College: 1% of income from government
  • Connecticut Audubon Society Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Kars 4 Kids Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
38report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Aptargroup Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Aptargroup Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 279 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Aptargroup’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home