Skip to content
Anchorum St Vincent at a glance

· Public charity

Anchorum St Vincent

Anchorum st.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.3M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$63MEducation$4.1MHousing & Shelter$3.5MPhilanthropy$2.8MHuman Services$967kCrime & Legal$862kPublic Safety & Disaster$745kCommunity Improvement$495kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,300,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$371M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANCHORUM HEALTH FOUNDATION$1,300,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $2.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 52% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 13%ESPANOLA PATHWAYS SHELTER: $300k → 18%DREAMTREE PROJECT INC: $190k → 18%COLLINS LAKE AUTISM CENTER: $6k → 21%DREAMTREE PROJECT INC: $100k → 18%DREAMTREE PROJECT INC: $46k → 18%THINK NEW MEXICO: $150k → 12%ESPANOLA PATHWAYS SHELTER: $100k → 18%THINK NEW MEXICO: $75k → 12%LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $91k → 18%COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE: $6k → 18%COMING HOME CONNECTION: $70k → 12%LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $73k → 18%COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE: $6k → 18%COMING HOME CONNECTION: $53k → 12%ESPANOLA PATHWAYS SHELTER: $46k → 18%DREAMTREE PROJECT INC: $6k → 18%DREAMTREE PROJECT INC: $5k → 18%LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $29k → 18%COMING HOME CONNECTION: $48k → 12%COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE: $5k → 18%COMING HOME CONNECTION: $46k → 12%THINK NEW MEXICO: $25k → 12%THE COMING HOME CONNECTION INC: $25k → 12%THINK NEW MEXICO: $25k → 12%THINK NEW MEXICO: $25k → 12%CASA MILAGRO: $70k → 12%CASA MILAGRO: $46k → 12%CASA MILAGRO: $27k → 12%CASA MILAGRO: $23k → 12%CASA MILAGRO: $22k → 12%COMING HOME CONNECTION: $75k → 12%MEMORY CARE ALLIANCE: $50k → 12%MEMORY CARE ALLIANCE: $35k → 12%LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $27k → 12%CHAINBREAKER COLLECTIVE: $6k → 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $6k → 12%CHAINBREAKER COLLECTIVE: $6k → 12%THE FOOD DEPOT: $6k → 12%THE FOOD DEPOT: $6k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$73M · 65 repeat orgs$607k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

65 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 64 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

65
28

Total granted

$73M
$607k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+6%

Still filing today

89%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    ANCHORUM HEALTH FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $53M · revenue ×55 · 100% of their budget
  • SV
    St Vincent Hospital
    4× · 2017–2020 · $6.4M · revenue +84%
  • CI
    COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF NEW MEXICO
    7× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +225%

Funded once

  • SF
    SANTA FE COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2019 · $68k
  • LV
    LAS VEGAS NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUN
    one grant, 2022 · $65k · revenue -12%
  • HM
    HELP-NEW MEXICO INC
    one grant, 2022 · $65k · revenue -28%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Power New Mexico
Community Improvement
2
Casa Partners 4NMKIDS Inc

The casa program is a community-based program that recruits, trains and supports citizen-volunteers to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children in courtrooms and communities. the organization serves children in…

Civil Rights
3
Southwest Care Center

To improve the health of people living in the culturally diverse communities of northern new mexico through access to the highest quality health care, education, research and advocacy.

—
4
Santa Maria El Mirador

To provide quality supports and services for children, families, and individuals in northern new mexico. our programs and services include: community living support, meaningful day supports, and transportation. we promote and maintain an…

Human Services
5
New Mexico Center for Nursing Excellence

The mission of NMCNE is to advance and engage the nursing community to promote excellence and improve the health of all New Mexicans.

Health
6
New Mexico Dream Center of Albuquerque

New mexico dream center's mission is to restore the dreams of the hopeless, the helpless, the hurting and the broken. specifically, albuquerque new mexico has a huge gaping hole in services for homeless youth and trafficked minor children.…

Religion
7
Casa Fortaleza

Casa fortaleza provides advocacy, case management services, therapy, and outreach to victims/survivors of sexual violence.

Health
8
La Casa Inc

Provide emergency shelter care for adult persons and their children who are victims of domestic violence, and educate the community about the problems related to domestic violence is all its forms.

—
9
New Mexico Kids Matter Inc

New mexico kids matter inc., serves as a court appointed special advocate to advocate for the best interest of abused, neglected and high-risk children.

Crime & Legal
10
Community Foundation of Southern New Mexico

The Community Foundation of Southern New Mexico serves as a community resource, connects donors to needs, and supports charitable organizations in their work.

Philanthropy
11
Leadership New Mexico

Strengthening new mexico by educating and connecting diverse leaders through experiential learning programs and activities.

Arts & Culture
12
Enlace Comunitario

To work to eliminate domestic violence in the latino immigrant community and to promote healthy families through comprehensive domestic violence intervention services in spanish, preventative community education policy advocacy and…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Mexico Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Memory Care Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

86 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 86 of the 96 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
31
Early backer (in before they grew)
83/86
Grantees still filing
64/86
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ANCHORUM HEALTH FOUNDATION: $52,631,280 · HealthANCHORUM HEALTH FOUNDATIONSt Vincent Hospital: $6,358,350 · HealthSt Vincent Hospital+13 more: $2,253,235 · HealthSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,311,282 · PhilanthropyGROWING UP NEW MEXICOINC: $809,079 · PhilanthropyNEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $440,000 · PhilanthropyTHE TAOS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF NEW MEXICO: $1,336,282 · EducationLOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY FOUNDATION: $565,000 · EducationGROUNDWORKS NEW MEXICO KRISTI DORR: $275,000 · EducationREADING QUEST: $215,000 · EducationSANTA FE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $211,970 · EducationPARTNERS IN EDUCATION FOR THE SANTA FE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $203,300 · EducationSTEM Santa Fe: $175,000 · EducationTHE ARMAND HAMMER UNITED WORLD COLLEGE OF THE AMER: $165,000 · EducationFUTURE FOCUSED EDUCATION: $150,000 · Education+5 more: $212,252 · EducationHOMEWISE INC: $1,200,000 · OtherSOLACE SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES: $282,540 · OtherThe Family YMCA: $226,282 · OtherLA FAMILIA MEDICAL CENTER: $207,792 · OtherMcCURDY SCHOOLS OF NORTHERN NEW MEXICO McCURDY MINISTRIES COMMUNITY CENTER: $201,282 · OtherNUSENDA CREDIT UNION: $150,000 · OtherKITCHEN ANGELS INC: $132,231 · Other501(C)PA: $260,000 · OtherMOVING ARTS ESPANOLA INCORPORATED: $165,000 · Other+33 more: $1,111,469 · OtherESPANOLA PATHWAYS SHELTER: $445,540 · Human ServicesDREAM TREE PROJECT: $346,822 · Human ServicesCOMING HOME CONNECTION: $316,757 · Human ServicesTHINK NEW MEXICO: $300,000 · Human ServicesLAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $220,130 · Human ServicesCASA MILAGRO: $187,536 · Human ServicesYOUTH SHELTERS & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $106,035 · Human ServicesMemory Care Alliance: $85,000 · Human Services+6 more: $69,769 · Human ServicesNEW MEXICO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS: $617,500 · Housing & ShelterSAINT ELIZABETH SHELTER CORPORATION: $313,087 · Housing & ShelterINTERFAITH COMMUNITY SHELTER GROUP INC: $214,926 · Housing & ShelterMESA TO MESA: $75,963 · Housing & ShelterNEW MEXICO LEGAL AID INC: $713,282 · Crime & LegalCONTIGO IMMIGRANT JUSTICE: $81,186 · Crime & Legal+1 more: $11,282 · Crime & Legal
Health$61,242,865Philanthropy$3,760,361Education$3,508,804Other$3,936,596Human Services$2,077,589Housing & Shelter$1,221,476Crime & Legal$805,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANCHORUM HEALTH FOUNDATION: $52,631,280 over 4y, 100% of budgetSt Vincent Hospital: $6,358,350 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,311,282 over 7y, 4.4% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF NEW MEXICO: $1,336,282 over 7y, 16% of budgetHOMEWISE INC: $1,200,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetSANTA FE RECOVERY CENTER INC: $931,347 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetGROWING UP NEW MEXICOINC: $809,079 over 6y, 6.9% of budgetNEW MEXICO LEGAL AID INC: $713,282 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetNEW MEXICO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS: $617,500 over 4y, 5.4% of budgetLOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY FOUNDATION: $565,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetESPANOLA PATHWAYS SHELTER: $445,540 over 3y, 35% of budgetNEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $440,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $405,000 over 5y, 21% of budgetDREAM TREE PROJECT: $346,822 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetNEW MEXICO SUICIDE INTERVENTION PROJECT INC: $329,500 over 4y, 14% of budgetCOMING HOME CONNECTION: $316,757 over 6y, 19% of budgetSAINT ELIZABETH SHELTER CORPORATION: $313,087 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetTHINK NEW MEXICO: $300,000 over 5y, 6.1% of budgetSOLACE SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES: $282,540 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetGROUNDWORKS NEW MEXICO KRISTI DORR: $275,000 over 4y, 47% of budget501(C)PA: $260,000 over 4y, 8.3% of budgetThe Family YMCA: $226,282 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetLAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $220,130 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetREADING QUEST: $215,000 over 5y, 8.2% of budgetINTERFAITH COMMUNITY SHELTER GROUP INC: $214,926 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetSANTA FE MOUNTAIN CENTER INC: $213,151 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetSANTA FE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $211,970 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetLA FAMILIA MEDICAL CENTER: $207,792 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetPARTNERS IN EDUCATION FOR THE SANTA FE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $203,300 over 3y, 31% of budgetMcCURDY SCHOOLS OF NORTHERN NEW MEXICO McCURDY MINISTRIES COMMUNITY CENTER: $201,282 over 4y, 15% of budgetTHE TAOS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetCASA MILAGRO: $187,536 over 5y, 21% of budgetSTEM Santa Fe: $175,000 over 5y, 15% of budgetMOVING ARTS ESPANOLA INCORPORATED: $165,000 over 3y, 8.0% of budgetTHE ARMAND HAMMER UNITED WORLD COLLEGE OF THE AMER: $165,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGERARD'S HOUSE: $159,789 over 5y, 8.2% of budgetFUTURE FOCUSED EDUCATION: $150,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetKITCHEN ANGELS INC: $132,231 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR MONTE DEL SOL CHARTER SCHOOL: $110,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetEsperanza Shelter Inc: $106,151 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetYOUTH SHELTERS & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $106,035 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetMemory Care Alliance: $85,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetPivotal New Mexico: $85,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetCONTIGO IMMIGRANT JUSTICE: $81,186 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetEIGHT NORTHERN INDIAN PUEBLOS COUNCIL INC: $80,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMESA TO MESA: $75,963 over 5y, 17% of budgetLife Circle: $75,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetYOUTHWORKS: $74,970 over 2y, 4.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Fe Community Fo…St Vincent HospitalCon Alma Health Found…Thornburg FoundationLos Alamos National L…Marshall L and Perrin…The Frost FoundationNusenda FoundationNew Mexico Community …Anchorum Health Found…Brindle FoundationAlbuquerque Community…
Santa Fe Community FoundationNM146.4× affinity75 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · St Vincent Hospital · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · Thornburg Foundation · Los Alamos National Laboratory Foundation · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · The Frost Foundation · Nusenda Foundation · New Mexico Community Foundation · Anchorum Health Foundation · Brindle Foundation · Albuquerque Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Anchorum St Vincent funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Anchorum St Vincent. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    22report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 96 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Anchorum St Vincent’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home