Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Anchorum Health Foundation

ANCHORUM HEALTH FOUNDATION is dedicated to improving the conditions that have the greatest influence on the health of communities and people in our region.

$21M
Granted FY2025still arriving
53
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$10M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 67% of ANCHORUM HEALTH FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 53 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $260k
  • $50k–250k31 grants · $3.8M
  • $250k+10 grants · $17M
$100,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$455M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHRISTUS ST VINCENT MEDICAL CENTER$10,000,000
SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$2,360,000
NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION$1,147,500
TAOS COMMUNITY FOUNDAITON$765,000
LAS VEGAS NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$760,000
NATIVE COMMUNITY CAPITAL$500,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO$430,000
UNITED WAY OF NORTH CENTRAL NEW MEXICO$330,000
LA FAMILIA MEDICAL CENTER$305,283
NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY TRUST$250,000
COMMUNITY INVESTMENT ALLIANCE$234,243
ALBUQUERQUE AREA INDIAN HEALTH BOARD$220,000
LOS ALAMOS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$210,000
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF NEW MEXICO$205,000
NEW MEXICO IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER$200,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $345k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THINK NEW MEXICO: $150k → 12%DREAMTREE PROJECT: $125k → 18%ESPANOLA PATHWAYS SHELTER: $50k → 18%ENCUENTRO: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 45% of Anchorum Health Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Anchorum Health Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$33M · 8 repeat orgs$4.8M to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 39 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
6

Total granted

$33M
$530k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

88%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CHRISTUS ST VINCENT MEDICAL GROUP
    2× · 2024–2025 · $30M
  • LV
    LAS VEGAS NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUN
    2× · 2024–2025 · $1.5M · revenue 0% · 54% of their budget
  • CI
    COMMUNITY INVESTMENT ALLIANCE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $356k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • NM
    NEW MEXICO LEGAL AID INC
    one grant, 2024 · $200k · revenue 0%
  • SF
    SANTA FE RECOVERY CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $180k · revenue +28%
  • NC
    NUSENDA CREDIT UNION
    one grant, 2024 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Leadership New Mexico

Strengthening new mexico by educating and connecting diverse leaders through experiential learning programs and activities.

Arts & Culture
2
Community Power New Mexico
Community Improvement
3
New Mexico Perinatal Collaborative

The mission of the new mexico perinatal collaborative is to convene stakeholders to achieve health equity through the promotion of evidence- based reproductive and perinatal health practices that: increase collaboration with communities…

—
4
New Mexico Center for Nursing Excellence

The mission of NMCNE is to advance and engage the nursing community to promote excellence and improve the health of all New Mexicans.

Health
5
New Mexico Humanities Council

The new mexico humanities council (nmhc) supports and conducts innovative and imaginative programs throughout the state that lead to a greater understanding of, and motivate interest in, the richness of our human experience and heritage.…

—
6
Central New Mexico Community College Foundation Inc

The cnm foundation is committed to the principle that no central new mexico community college student should be denied the opportunity for an education or vocational training due solely to a lack of financial resources. the cnm foundation…

—
7
New Mexico Foundation for Open Government

To ensure that government is accountable to the voters and taxpayers.

Crime & Legal
8
New Mexico Voices for Children

To improve the status, well-being and racial/ethnic equity of new mexicos children, families, and communities in the areas of health, education, and economic security by promoting public policies through credible research and effective…

Civil Rights
9
Northern New Mexicans Protecting Land Water and Rights Inc

Northern new mexicans protecting land water and rights strives to lessen the stress of neighborhood tensions due to lack of information and fair representation. by providing an organization whose main goal is to unite and empower the…

—
10
New Mexico Community Development Loan Fund Inc

See schedule othe loan fund was formed to encourage and facilitate the investment of capital in low-income new mexico communities through individuals, religious and community organizations, foundations, government entities, lending…

—
11
Vida Mejor Capital Inc

Primary exempt purpose: at vida mejor capital, our mission is to empower new mexican small businesses through technical assistance and equitable access to capital, with a dedicated focus on advancing food justice, food sovereignty, and…

Community Improvement
12
Southwest Care Center

To improve the health of people living in the culturally diverse communities of northern new mexico through access to the highest quality health care, education, research and advocacy.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Mexico Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Care Lab. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadySan Juan Community Organiza…Family Support Services for…Community Health CentersNew Mexico Policy & Legal A…Land, Water & SustainabilitySenior Housing and Care Ser…Youth Education & Stem Prog…Affordable Housing Developm…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%17%<5yr12%10%5–10yr20%24%10–20yr18%21%20–35yr15%21%35–55yr15%7%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%4%<5yr12%12%5–10yr20%10%10–20yr18%17%20–35yr15%55%35–55yr15%2%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 17% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%2/60
the rest of the field
11%
663/5,921

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
52/54
Grantees still filing
13/54
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHRISTUS ST VINCENT MEDICAL GROUP — $30,000,000 · OtherCHRISTUS ST VINCENT MEDICAL GROUP+18 more — $2,353,254 · Other+18 moreSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $4,835,000 · PhilanthropySANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUN…NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $2,362,500 · PhilanthropyNEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FO…THE TAOS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $1,515,000 · PhilanthropyTHE TAOS COMMUNITY FOUN…LOS ALAMOS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $360,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF NORTH CENTRAL NEW MEXICO — $330,000 · Philanthropy+3 more — $225,200 · PhilanthropyLAS VEGAS NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUN — $1,510,000 · Community ImprovementNATIVE COMMUNITY CAPITAL — $500,000 · Community Improvement501(C)PA — $100,000 · Community Improvement+1 more — $50,000 · Community ImprovementSANTA FE RECOVERY CENTER INC — $180,000 · HealthSAN JUAN COUNTY PARTNERSHIP INC — $150,000 · HealthFIRST CHOICE COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE INC — $145,000 · HealthNEW MEXICO ALLIANCE OF HEALTH COUNCILS — $125,000 · HealthSAN JUAN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER — $100,000 · HealthSANTA FE MOUNTAIN CENTER INC — $100,000 · HealthPresbyterian Healthcare Foundation — $85,000 · HealthFamily Caregiver Center of NM — $75,000 · HealthCANCER FOUNDATION FOR NEW MEXICO — $40,000 · Health+1 more — $25,000 · HealthCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF NEW MEXICO — $205,000 · EducationFUTURE FOCUSED EDUCATION — $150,000 · EducationLOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY FOUNDATION — $130,000 · EducationGROUNDWORKS NEW MEXICO KRISTI DORR — $100,000 · EducationKERES CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER — $100,000 · EducationSAN JUAN COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · Education+5 more — $107,500 · EducationCOMMUNITY INVESTMENT ALLIANCE — $355,643 · Housing & ShelterINTERFAITH COMMUNITY SHELTER GROUP INC — $165,000 · Housing & ShelterTAOS HOUSING PARTNERSHIP — $50,000 · Housing & ShelterNEW MEXICO IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER — $200,000 · Human ServicesTHINK NEW MEXICO — $150,000 · Human ServicesDREAM TREE PROJECT — $125,000 · Human ServicesESPANOLA PATHWAYS SHELTER — $50,000 · Human ServicesLA PLAZA DE ENCUENTRO GATHERING PLACE — $20,000 · Human Services
Other$32,353,254Philanthropy$9,627,700Community Improvement$2,160,000Health$1,025,000Education$892,500Housing & Shelter$570,643Human Services$545,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $4,835,000 over 2y, 9.5% of budgetNEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $2,362,500 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetTHE TAOS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $1,515,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetLAS VEGAS NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUN — $1,510,000 over 2y, 54% of budgetLOS ALAMOS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $360,000 over 2y, 37% of budgetCOMMUNITY INVESTMENT ALLIANCE — $355,643 over 2y, 11% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTH CENTRAL NEW MEXICO — $330,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetLA FAMILIA MEDICAL CENTER — $328,254 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetNEW MEXICO COMMUNITY TRUST — $300,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF NEW MEXICO — $205,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetNEW MEXICO LEGAL AID INC — $200,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetNEW MEXICO CENTER ON LAW AND POVERTY — $200,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetNEW MEXICO IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER — $200,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetSANTA FE RECOVERY CENTER INC — $180,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetINTERFAITH COMMUNITY SHELTER GROUP INC — $165,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetNATIONAL DANCE INSTITUTE NM INC — $150,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetSAN JUAN COUNTY PARTNERSHIP INC — $150,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetFUTURE FOCUSED EDUCATION — $150,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetFIRST CHOICE COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE INC — $145,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGROWING UP NEW MEXICOINC — $130,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetLOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY FOUNDATION — $130,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetNEW MEXICO ALLIANCE OF HEALTH COUNCILS — $125,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budget501(C)PA — $100,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetKERES CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER — $100,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetSAN JUAN COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetSAN JUAN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA FE MOUNTAIN CENTER INC — $100,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetFamily Caregiver Center of NM — $75,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetESPANOLA PATHWAYS SHELTER — $50,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetINOURHANDS-DOT-LOVE INCORPORATED — $50,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetIMAGINE NEW MEXICO — $50,000 over 1y, 52% of budgetTAOS HOUSING PARTNERSHIP — $50,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetCANCER FOUNDATION FOR NEW MEXICO — $40,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR MONTE DEL SOL CHARTER SCHOOL — $25,000 over 1y, 40% of budgetREADING QUEST — $25,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetTHE ARMAND HAMMER UNITED WORLD COLLEGE OF THE AMER — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTEM Santa Fe — $25,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetNEW MEXICO FOUNDATION FOR DENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH AND EDUCATION — $25,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetCommunity Foundation of Southern New Mexico — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLA PLAZA DE ENCUENTRO GATHERING PLACE — $20,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCare Lab — $15,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Fe Community Fo…Anchorum St VincentMarshall L and Perrin…Albuquerque Community…Los Alamos National L…Thornburg FoundationCon Alma Health Found…Brindle FoundationNew Mexico Community …St Vincent HospitalBattelle Memorial Ins…Nusenda Foundation
Santa Fe Community FoundationNM66.1× affinity31 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · Anchorum St Vincent · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · Albuquerque Community Foundation · Los Alamos National Laboratory Foundation · Thornburg Foundation · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · Brindle Foundation · New Mexico Community Foundation · St Vincent Hospital · Battelle Memorial Institute · Nusenda Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Anchorum Health Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 32%
  • Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation — 32% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Anchorum Health Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Anchorum Health Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines