· Public charity
All Within My Hands
ALL WITHIN MY HANDS foundation is dedicated to creating sustainablecommunities by supporting workforce education, the fight againsthunger, and other critical local services.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k12 grants · $395k
- $50k–250k16 grants · $980k
- $250k+1 grant · $2.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY COLLEGES | $2,676,050 |
| DIRECT RELIEF | $100,000 |
| WESTERN DAKOTA TECHNICAL COLLEGE | $100,000 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN | $100,000 |
| SUPPORT AND FEED INC | $80,000 |
| WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| INFORMATION TECH DISASTER RESOURCE CENTER | $50,000 |
| PIMA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC | $50,000 |
| TEAM RUBICON | $50,000 |
| SUPPORT AND FEED INC | $50,000 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN | $50,000 |
| MONTANA POOL SERVICE FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| SAN JUAN COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| FEEDING AMERICA | $50,000 |
| CHILDRENS HOSPITAL LA | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $370k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 5% of All Within My Hands’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 16% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 13% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $870k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AAAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY COLLEGES7× · 2018–2024 · $11M · revenue +54%
DIRECT RELIEF6× · 2017–2024 · $795k · revenue +94%- FAFEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN4× · 2019–2024 · $430k · revenue +37%
Funded once
- CFCALIFORNIA FARMLINKone grant, 2023 · $530k · revenue -29%
Feeding Americagraduatedone grant, 2017 · $190k · revenue +84%- LFLIVENATIONORG FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $170k · revenue -94%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.
The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…
To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.
Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.
To end hunger and transform the health of our community by providing nourishment to those in need by acquiring and distributing safe nutritious food via local agencies and by providing education to solve hunger and nutritional problems in…
With the support of our community, we provide over 90 million meals annually through our network of over 900 member food pantries and programs across thirteen counties, currently reaching over a half million individuals each month with…
Second harvest food bank's mission is to end hunger and malnutrition by educating and involving the community.
Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.
The Food Bank of Eastern Michigan's mission is to be the Food Source for people in need. Partnering with organizations to feed the hungry, we advocate and build a community solution to a community problem. By leveraging an abundance of…
Engaging the community to end hunger
The mission of the regional food bank of oklahoma is to lead a network that provides nutritious food and pathways to self-sufficiency for people facing hunger. our vision is an oklahoma where no one goes hungry.
The jacobs & cushman san diego food bank is the largest hunger-relief organization in san diego county. its mission is to provide nutritious food to people in need, advocate for the hungry, and educate the public about hunger-related…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Central Pennsylvania Food Bank and the most unlike its peers is Montana Pool Service Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
105 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 105 of the 110 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY COLLEGES ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA FARMLINK ↗
- Who funds FEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds LIVENATIONORG FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE MISSION CONTINUES ↗
- Who funds SUPPORT AND FEED INC ↗
- Who funds TEAM RUBICON INC ↗
- Who funds SONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WESTERN DAKOTA VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds USBG NATIONAL CHARITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FEEDING TEXAS ↗
- Who funds GRAND RAPIDS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds SAN JUAN COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Neighborhood Food Pantries ↗
- Who funds PIMA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MONTEREY COUNTY ↗
- Who funds WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds The Houston Food Bank ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ROOTED IN LOVE INC ↗
- Who funds Second Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina Inc ↗
- Who funds WSU Tech Foundation ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NAPA VALLEY ↗
- Who funds MUSICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DISASTER RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MONTANA POOL SERVICE FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Bnsf Railway Foundation · California Community Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization All Within My Hands funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Oregon Food Bank — 21% of income from government
- Women's Lunch Place Inc — 8% of income from government
- Feeding South Florida Inc — 5% of income from government
- The Oregon Community Foundation — 2% of income from government
- Clackamas Community College Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to All Within My Hands?
Find your warmest path to All Within My Hands through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.