Skip to content
All Within My Hands at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

All Within My Hands

ALL WITHIN MY HANDS foundation is dedicated to creating sustainablecommunities by supporting workforce education, the fight againsthunger, and other critical local services.

$4.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
29
Grants FY2024still arriving
14
States reached
$2.7M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$11MFood & Nutrition$2.6MPublic Safety & Disaster$2.2MInternational$795kPhilanthropy$250kHuman Services$240kArts & Culture$220kHousing & Shelter$163kOther$0
02FY2024 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k12 grants · $395k
  • $50k–250k16 grants · $980k
  • $250k+1 grant · $2.7M
$50,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY COLLEGES$2,676,050
WESTERN DAKOTA TECHNICAL COLLEGE$100,000
DIRECT RELIEF$100,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$100,000
SUPPORT AND FEED INC$80,000
FEEDING AMERICA$50,000
INFORMATION TECH DISASTER RESOURCE CENTER$50,000
HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES$50,000
WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$50,000
TEAM RUBICON$50,000
EAST CENTRAL COLLEGE$50,000
PIMA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC$50,000
SAN JUAN COLLEGE FOUNDATION$50,000
MONTANA POOL SERVICE FOUNDATION$50,000
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL LA$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $370k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GALILEE CENTER: $40k → 11%CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $35k → 11%INTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $10k → 8%NEIGHBORHOOD FOOD PANTRIES: $40k → 7%STRENGTHEN OUR SISTERS: $30k → 12%WOMES CENTER & SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $20k → 11%ROOTED IN LOVE: $50k → 13%NEIGHBORHOOD FOOD PANTRIES: $10k → 7%ELIZABETH GREGORY HOME: $20k → 9%USBG NATIONAL CHARITY FOUNDATION: $85k → 13%LOS ANGELES HOUSE OF RUTH: $30k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
MD
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
DC
HI
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of All Within My Hands’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 16% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 13%.

All Within My Handslessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.2% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14M · 16 repeat orgs$3.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
68

Total granted

$14M
$2.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+36%

Still filing today

94%
97%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $870k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterPublic Safety & DisasterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY COLLEGES
    7× · 2018–2024 · $11M · revenue +54%
  • DIRECT RELIEF
    6× · 2017–2024 · $795k · revenue +94%
  • FA
    FEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN
    4× · 2019–2024 · $430k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • CF
    CALIFORNIA FARMLINK
    one grant, 2023 · $530k · revenue -29%
  • Feeding Americagraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $190k · revenue +84%
  • LF
    LIVENATIONORG FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $170k · revenue -94%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
2
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
3
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
4
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
5
Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc

To end hunger and transform the health of our community by providing nourishment to those in need by acquiring and distributing safe nutritious food via local agencies and by providing education to solve hunger and nutritional problems in…

Food & Nutrition
6
Northern Illinois Food Bank

With the support of our community, we provide over 90 million meals annually through our network of over 900 member food pantries and programs across thirteen counties, currently reaching over a half million individuals each month with…

Food & Nutrition
7
Second Harvest Food Bank Santa Cruz County

Second harvest food bank's mission is to end hunger and malnutrition by educating and involving the community.

Food & Nutrition
8
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

—
9
Food Bank of Eastern Michigan

The Food Bank of Eastern Michigan's mission is to be the Food Source for people in need. Partnering with organizations to feed the hungry, we advocate and build a community solution to a community problem. By leveraging an abundance of…

Food & Nutrition
10
Food Bank of Central & Eastern Nc Inc

Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
11
Regional Food Bank of Oklahoma Inc

The mission of the regional food bank of oklahoma is to lead a network that provides nutritious food and pathways to self-sufficiency for people facing hunger. our vision is an oklahoma where no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
12
Montana Food Bank Network Inc

Our mission: to end hunger in montana through food acquisition and distribution, education, and advocacy. we are the only statewide hunger organization, providing emergency food and increasing food access among needy children, seniors and…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Cleveland Food Bank Inc; the most unlike its peers is Montana Pool Service Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

105 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 105 of the 110 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
104/105
Grantees still filing
79/105
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY COLLEGES: $10,651,200 · EducationAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY COLLEGESCALIFORNIA FARMLINK: $530,000 · Education+7 more: $255,000 · EducationWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $1,525,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL …DIRECT RELIEF: $795,000 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEFFEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN: $430,000 · OtherFEEDING AME…WESTERN DAKOTA VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · OtherLIVENATIONORG FOUNDATION: $170,000 · OtherLIVENATIONO…THE MISSION CONTINUES: $166,667 · OtherTHE MISSION…Children's Hospital Los Angeles: $100,000 · OtherFEEDING TEXAS: $75,000 · Other+28 more: $877,500 · Other+28 moreCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $250,000 · PhilanthropyHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $200,000 · PhilanthropySONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $100,000 · PhilanthropyTHE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $75,000 · PhilanthropyNORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $75,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MONTEREY COUNTY: $50,000 · PhilanthropyTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY: $50,000 · PhilanthropyWESTCHESTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NAPA VALLEY: $50,000 · PhilanthropyMONTANA POOL SERVICE FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $50,000 · PhilanthropyFeeding America: $190,000 · Food & NutritionSUPPORT AND FEED INC: $130,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC: $60,000 · Food & NutritionSecond Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina Inc: $50,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD LIFELINE: $40,000 · Food & NutritionGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $35,000 · Food & NutritionDARE TO CARE INC: $35,000 · Food & NutritionST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $35,000 · Food & Nutrition+30 more: $347,500 · Food & NutritionUSBG NATIONAL CHARITY FOUNDATION: $85,000 · Human ServicesNeighborhood Food Pantries: $50,000 · Human ServicesROOTED IN LOVE INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesGALILEE CENTER INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $35,000 · Human ServicesSOJOURNER CENTER: $35,000 · Human ServicesTHE WOMEN'S SAFE HOUSE: $35,000 · Human ServicesSTRENGTHEN OUR SISTERS INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesLOS ANGELES HOUSE OF RUTH: $30,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S CENTER AND SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $20,000 · Human ServicesElizabeth Home: $20,000 · Human Services+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesTEAM RUBICON INC: $125,000 · Public Safety & DisasterINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DISASTER RESOURCE CENTER INC: $50,000 · Public Safety & DisasterLOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Education$11,436,200International$2,320,000Other$1,919,167Philanthropy$1,000,000Food & Nutrition$922,500Human Services$440,000Public Safety & Disaster$225,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY COLLEGES: $10,651,200 over 7y, 18% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $1,525,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $795,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA FARMLINK: $530,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN: $430,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFeeding America: $190,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIVENATIONORG FOUNDATION: $170,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE MISSION CONTINUES: $166,667 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSUPPORT AND FEED INC: $130,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC: $125,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERN DAKOTA VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetUSBG NATIONAL CHARITY FOUNDATION: $85,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFEEDING TEXAS: $75,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND RAPIDS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC: $60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNeighborhood Food Pantries: $50,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MONTEREY COUNTY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSecond Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWSU Tech Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DISASTER RESOURCE CENTER INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetWESTCHESTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetROOTED IN LOVE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 88% of budgetSAN JUAN COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetMUSICARES FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NAPA VALLEY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMONTANA POOL SERVICE FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetPIMA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPEOPLE SERVING PEOPLE INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARGARETS VILLAGE: $40,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGALILEE CENTER INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFOOD LIFELINE: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S LUNCH PLACE INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSACRAMENTO FOOD BANK & FAMILY SERVICES: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $35,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOJOURNER CENTER: $35,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S SAFE HOUSE: $35,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC: $35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving …Bnsf Railway Foundati…California Community …Charities Aid Foundat…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Network for GoodNational Philanthropi…Renaissance Charitabl…Vanguard Charitable E…The Pfizer Foundation…American Online Givin…Silicon Valley Commun…
The Blackbaud Giving FundSC12.8× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Bnsf Railway Foundation · California Community Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization All Within My Hands funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from All Within My Hands. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Oregon Food Bank: 21% of income from government
  • Women's Lunch Place Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Feeding South Florida Inc: 5% of income from government
  • The Oregon Community Foundation: 2% of income from government
  • Clackamas Community College Foundation: 0% of income from government
  • Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
52report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to All Within My Hands?

Find your warmest path to All Within My Hands through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 110 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on All Within My Hands’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home