Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Adams Mastrovich Fam Fdn

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
71
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$190k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.

Arts & Culture$2.7MEducation$1.8MHuman Services$1.6MHousing & Shelter$676kHealth$537kReligion$530kYouth Development$527kFood & Nutrition$351kOther$0
02FY2024 · 71 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k20 grants · $104k
  • $10k–50k47 grants · $756k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $395k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DEADWOOD HISTORY INC$190,000
LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY$100,000
Individual grant recipient$55,000
MARYCREST MANOR INC$50,000
HISTORIC HOMESTAKE OPERA HOUSE$40,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES$40,000
NORTHERN HILLS ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN$40,000
SAINT ANDREWS ABBEY INC$35,000
CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICE$30,000
DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER (DWC)$25,000
SANTA TERESITA INC$25,000
WOLAKOTA WALDORF SOCIETY$20,000
YOUNG MUSICIANS FOUNDATION$20,000
PROJECT ANGEL FOOD$20,000
RAINBOW SERVICES$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $1.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AbilityFirst: $10k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $25k → 14%New Beginnings Inc: $10k → 11%DOWNTOWN WOMENS CENTER: $25k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $25k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMENS CENTER: $25k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMENS CENTER: $25k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMENS CENTER: $25k → 14%NORTHERN HILLS ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN: $50k → 11%DOWNTOWN WOMENS CENTER: $25k → 14%NORTHERN HILLS ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN: $50k → 11%NORTHERN HILLS ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN: $50k → 11%NORTHERN HILLS ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN: $40k → 11%NORTHERN HILLS ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN: $40k → 11%NORTHERN HILLS ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN: $40k → 11%NORTHERN HILLS ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN: $40k → 11%VISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 14%Vista Del Mar Child and Family Services: $10k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY: $10k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $15k → 14%Alexandria House: $20k → 14%ALEXANDRIA HOUSE: $20k → 14%ALEXANDRIA HOUSE: $20k → 14%COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $15k → 14%COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $10k → 14%Assistance League of Los Angeles: $10k → 14%LOST ANGELS CHILDRENS PROJECT INC: $10k → 14%Why Cant We Make A Difference Foundation: $10k → 14%HOMELESS NOT TOOTHLESS: $10k → 14%HOMELESS NOT TOOTHLESS: $10k → 14%UNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES: $15k → 14%UNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES: $10k → 14%RAINBOW SERVICES: $20k → 14%KOREAN AMERICAN WOMENS ASSOCIATION: $20k → 14%GOOD SHEPHERD CENTER: $50k → 14%PROYECTO PASTOTRAL: $20k → 14%PROYECTO PASTOTRAL: $20k → 14%PROYECTO PASTORAL: $15k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES: $115k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES: $65k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES: $60k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES: $40k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES: $35k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES: $35k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES: $30k → 14%THE MIDNIGHT MISSION: $25k → 14%The Midnight Mission: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
SD
CA
MD
NC
DC
OK
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$8.0M · 82 repeat orgs$962k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +42% for the ones you funded once.

82 repeat relationships — 47 still active in FY2024, 35 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

82
72

Total granted

$8.0M
$656k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+42%

Still filing today

76%
68%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $306k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DH
    DEADWOOD HISTORY INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +35%
  • LM
    LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2018–2024 · $876k · revenue +47%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $430k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +9%
  • EC
    El Centro De Amistad Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +70%
  • KA
    KOREAN AMERICAN WOMENS ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue -2%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wellnest Emotional Health & Wellness

Through a holistic approach to emotional well-being, Wellnest offers hope, healing, and opportunity to the children, young adults, families, and communities we serve. Our commitment remains steadfast as we enter our second century of…

Human Services
2
Interval House

The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…

Human Services
3
Didi Hirsch Psychiatric Service

The roots of the los angeles didi hirsch psychiatric service dba didi hirsch mental health services ("dhmhs") extend back to the 1930s, when a group of women funded psychiatric care for people whose lives were devastated by the depression.…

Health
4
La Casa de las Madres

La Casa de las Madres' mission is to respond to calls for help from DV victims, of all ages, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. We give survivors the tools to transform their lives. We seek to prevent future violence by educating the…

—
5
Los Angeles Centers for Alcohol and Drug Abuse

Our Vision is to enhance the educational and economic well-being of the people we serve by means of direct human services, advocacy, and referrals.Our Mission is to save lives, unite families, and protect the community through addiction…

—
6
Hillsides

We are a premier provider dedicated to healing children and young adults, strengthening families, and transforming communities through quality comprehensive services and advocacy. we envision a world in which children and young adults,…

Human Services
7
Housing Works

Our mission is to create housing and service options that model, with respect and dignity, sustainable, environmentally sensitive, affordable communities for people of limited resources.

Housing & Shelter
8
End Homelessness California

To build capacity and community engagement to better serve the most vulnerable population suffering poverty and the homeless crisis.

Human Services
9
Los Angeles Youth Network

Youth Emerging Stronger (YES) empowers young people, between ages of 12 and 24 within Los Angeles County, including but not limited to run-away and homeless youth. YES mission is to end homelessness one youth at a time to become…

Human Services
10
Young Women's Christian Association of Greater Los Angeles

Dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all.

Human Services
11
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
12
Via Care Community Health Center

Providing health care services to the poor and underserved of los angeles.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ywca of Glendale and Pasadena and the most unlike its peers is Saturday Night Bath Concert Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyArts and Culture Organizati…Affordable Housing ProvidersCommunity Health & Social S…K-12 Schools and Educationa…Senior and Disability Housi…Family Philanthropic Founda…Christian Missionary Organi…Advocacy and Systems ChangeDiverse Community Organizat…Local Economic Development …Higher Education SupportMedical Research & Healthca…Early Childhood Education &…Veterans and Community Serv…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%1%<5yr16%3%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr17%24%20–35yr10%28%35–55yr12%30%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%0%<5yr16%1%5–10yr20%39%10–20yr17%16%20–35yr10%14%35–55yr12%31%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%2/146
the rest of the field
16%
8,004/51,233

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

130 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 130 of the 179 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
34
Early backer (in before they grew)
127/130
Grantees still filing
94/130
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

RED CLOUD INDIAN SCHOOL — $400,000 · OtherRED CLOUD INDIAN SCHOOLSAINT ANDREWS ABBEY INC — $215,000 · OtherSAINT ANDREWS ABBEY INCGOOD SHEPHERD SHELTER — $125,000 · OtherWOLAKOTA WALDORF SOCIETY — $120,000 · OtherHistoric Deadwood-Lead Arts Council — $107,500 · OtherLOS ANGELES MUSIC AND ART SCHOOL — $95,000 · OtherSANTA TERESITA INC — $95,000 · Other+82 more — $1,545,028 · Other+82 moreDEADWOOD HISTORY INC — $1,590,000 · Arts & CultureDEADWOOD HISTORY INCHISTORIC HOMESTAKE OPERA HOUSE SOCIETY — $330,000 · Arts & CultureHISTORIC HOMESTAKE OPERA HOUS…YOUNG MUSICIANS FOUNDATION — $90,000 · Arts & Culture+18 more — $375,900 · Arts & Culture+18 moreCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC — $430,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES…NORTHERN HILLS ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN — $310,000 · Human ServicesNORTHERN HILLS ALL…DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER — $150,000 · Human ServicesDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S C…Proyecto Pastoral — $65,000 · Human ServicesALEXANDRIA HOUSE — $60,000 · Human Services+28 more — $497,500 · Human Services+28 moreLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY — $875,976 · EducationLOYOLA MARYMOU…HAMBURGER HOME — $95,000 · EducationHAMBURGER HOMENEW VILLAGE CHARTER SCHOOL INC — $70,000 · EducationNEW VILLAGE CH…UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $50,000 · Education+7 more — $101,500 · Education+7 moreMARYCREST MANOR — $222,580 · HealthPROJECT ANGEL FOOD — $105,000 · HealthVENICE FAMILY CLINIC — $100,000 · HealthCROSSROADS INC — $70,000 · HealthMCCROSSAN BOYS RANCH — $40,000 · HealthWILMINGTON COMMUNITY CLINIC — $37,000 · HealthLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR LOS ANGELES — $30,000 · Health+7 more — $65,000 · HealthHEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC — $110,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS INC OF GREATER LOS ANGELES — $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF HOLLYWOOD INC — $60,000 · Youth DevelopmentHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES — $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CARSON INC — $20,000 · Youth Development+1 more — $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentFOOD FORWARD INC — $105,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD FINDERS INC — $77,000 · Food & NutritionFEAST Inc — $13,022 · Food & NutritionFEEDING SOUTH DAKOTA — $10,000 · Food & NutritionBROTHERS HELPERS INC — $10,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$2,702,528Arts & Culture$2,385,900Human Services$1,512,500Education$1,192,476Health$669,580Youth Development$345,000Food & Nutrition$215,022

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDEADWOOD HISTORY INC — $1,590,000 over 7y, 23% of budgetLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY — $875,976 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC — $430,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetHISTORIC HOMESTAKE OPERA HOUSE SOCIETY — $330,000 over 7y, 12% of budgetNORTHERN HILLS ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN — $310,000 over 7y, 8.2% of budgetMARYCREST MANOR — $222,580 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER — $150,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetWOLAKOTA WALDORF SOCIETY — $120,000 over 6y, 7.1% of budgetHEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC — $110,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetHistoric Deadwood-Lead Arts Council — $107,500 over 7y, 38% of budgetFOOD FORWARD INC — $105,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT ANGEL FOOD — $105,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetGIRLS INC OF GREATER LOS ANGELES — $100,000 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC — $100,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES MUSIC AND ART SCHOOL — $95,000 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetSANTA TERESITA INC — $95,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetHAMBURGER HOME — $95,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG MUSICIANS FOUNDATION — $90,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetFOOD FINDERS INC — $77,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COLBURN SCHOOL — $75,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSROADS INC — $70,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetNEW VILLAGE CHARTER SCHOOL INC — $70,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetProyecto Pastoral — $65,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF HOLLYWOOD INC — $60,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetLIVENATIONORG FOUNDATION — $55,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetLOS ANGELES CHILDREN'S CHORUS — $53,500 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYWCA OF GLENDALE AND PASADENA — $50,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetPasadena Conservatory of Music — $50,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF SOUTH DAKOTA — $47,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAngelica Center for Arts and Music — $45,400 over 6y, 5.5% of budgetLACER AFTERSCHOOL PROGRAMS — $45,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER SIOUX FALLS — $45,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetVISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MIDNIGHT MISSION — $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMCCROSSAN BOYS RANCH — $40,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES — $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWILMINGTON COMMUNITY CLINIC — $37,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY HOPE dba ELIZABETH HOUSE — $35,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN COMMUNITY BOARD — $30,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetHaven Hills Inc — $30,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetLONG BEACH DAY NURSERY — $30,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR LOS ANGELES — $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHOUSE OF RUTH INC — $25,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA — $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSU CASA - ENDING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE — $25,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DEADWOOD HISTORY INC ↗
  • Who funds LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC ↗
  • Who funds HISTORIC HOMESTAKE OPERA HOUSE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN HILLS ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds MARYCREST MANOR ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WOLAKOTA WALDORF SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds HEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds Historic Deadwood-Lead Arts Council ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FORWARD INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT ANGEL FOOD ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INC OF GREATER LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds VENICE FAMILY CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES MUSIC AND ART SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds SANTA TERESITA INC ↗
  • Who funds HAMBURGER HOME ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MUSICIANS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FINDERS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COLBURN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW VILLAGE CHARTER SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds Proyecto Pastoral ↗
  • Who funds ALEXANDRIA HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF HOLLYWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds LIVENATIONORG FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES CHILDREN'S CHORUS ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES ↗
  • Who funds YWCA OF GLENDALE AND PASADENA ↗
  • Who funds Pasadena Conservatory of Music ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ahmanson Foundati…The Ralph M Parsons F…California Community …The Rose Hills Founda…Weingart FoundationSouth Dakota Communit…S Mark Taper Foundati…The Green FoundationShelter Partnership I…The Annenberg Foundat…United Way IncBlack Hills Area Comm…
The Ahmanson FoundationCA70× affinity36 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ahmanson Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · California Community Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · Weingart Foundation · South Dakota Community Foundation · S Mark Taper Foundation · The Green Foundation · Shelter Partnership Inc · The Annenberg Foundation · United Way Inc · Black Hills Area Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Adams Mastrovich Fam Fdn funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 23%
  • Youth and Family Services Inc — 23% of income from government
  • Florida Network of Youth and Family Services Inc — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
64report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Adams Mastrovich Fam Fdn?

Find your warmest path to Adams Mastrovich Fam Fdn through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 179 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines