· Private foundation
AC Israel Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k147 grants · $378k
- $10k–50k46 grants · $709k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $646k
- $250k+1 grant · $285k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CONGREGATION EMANU-EL OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK | $285,000 |
| YALE UNIVERSITY | $230,000 |
| WHITE PLAINS HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER | $100,000 |
| TRUSTEES OF PHILLIPS ACADEMY | $90,000 |
| BIRCHES SCHOOL INC | $64,000 |
| CITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR NEW YORK CITY INC | $61,500 |
| BOCA RATON REGIONAL HOSPITAL INC | $50,000 |
| U C SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| THE PEOPLE CONCERN | $37,000 |
| UNTERMYER GARDENS CONSERVANCY | $32,000 |
| BIRCHES SCHOOL INC | $28,990 |
| CICERO PREPARATORY ACADEMY | $25,000 |
| MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER The Societ | $25,000 |
| MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL | $25,000 |
| GREENS FARMS ACADEMY INC | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $263k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.
186 repeat relationships — 137 still active in FY2024, 49 since wound down; 35 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $197k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EMEisenhower Medical Center5× · 2020–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +66%
- BSBIRCHES SCHOOL INC6× · 2019–2024 · $401k · revenue +141%
- UGUNTERMYER GARDENS CONSERVANCY INC6× · 2019–2024 · $229k · revenue +117%
Funded once
MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $200k · revenue +82%- GHGREENWICH HOSPITALone grant, 2020 · $150k · revenue +17%
- FFFOUNDATION FOR CONSERVATIVE MASORTI-JUDAISM IN ISRone grant, 2023 · $110k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Yorkers for Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Als Worldwide. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
304 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 304 of the 379 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Eisenhower Medical Center ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF PHILLIPS ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds CITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR NEW YORK CITY INC ↗
- Who funds BIRCHES SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds Yale University ↗
- Who funds UNTERMYER GARDENS CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds LIVING DESERT THE ↗
- Who funds GREENS FARMS ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER ↗
- Who funds White Plains Hospital Medical Center ↗
- Who funds RIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds GREENWICH HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds RUMSEY HALL SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC ↗
- Who funds The Hospital for Special Surgery Fund Inc ↗
- Who funds PAWS CROSSED ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds THE PEOPLE CONCERN ↗
- Who funds CICERO PREPARATORY ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CASA OF LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds NoticeAbility Inc ↗
- Who funds COLLEGIATE SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
- Who funds Friends of the Cultural Center Inc ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds Boca Raton Regional Hospital Inc ↗
- Who funds JUILLIARD SCHOOL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · Bachmann Strauss Family Fund · Viking Global Foundation Inc · Fjc · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Newman's Own Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Jewish Communal Fund · The Peek Family Foundation Inc · Susan and Elihu Rose Foundation Inc · Malkin Fund Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization AC Israel Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Roca Inc — 78% of income from government
- Pathways Inc — 45% of income from government
- Homes With Hope — 28% of income from government
- Yale University — 12% of income from government
- Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
- Shelburne Museum Inc — 9% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Clubs of Dorchester Inc — 7% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Greenwich — 7% of income from government
- Martha's Vineyard Preservation Trust Inc — 4% of income from government
- Sheriff's Meadow Foundation — 2% of income from government
- The Trustees of the Smith College — 1% of income from government
- After School Arts Program Inc — 1% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Middlebury College — 1% of income from government
- Wellesley College — 1% of income from government
- Pilobolus Inc — 1% of income from government
- Greenwich Hospital — 0% of income from government
- The Fessenden School — 0% of income from government
- Steppingstone Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- Mt Washington Pediatric Hospital Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.